Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 77 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 37 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 35 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 125 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 172 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 457 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Physics Constrained Deep Learning For Turbulence Model Uncertainty Quantification (2405.16554v1)

Published 26 May 2024 in physics.flu-dyn and physics.comp-ph

Abstract: Engineering design and scientific analysis rely upon computer simulations of turbulent fluid flows using turbulence models. These turbulence models are empirical and approximate, leading to large uncertainties in their predictions that hamper scientific and engineering advances. We outline a Physics Constrained Deep Learning framework to estimate turbulence model uncertainties using physics based Eigenspace Perturbations along with Deep Learning based guidance. The Deep Learning based modulation controls the spatial variation in perturbation magnitude to improve the calibration of uncertainty estimates over the state of the art physics based methods.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (34)
  1. Machine learning for fluid mechanics. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 52:477–508, 2020.
  2. Model-form uncertainty quantification of reynolds-averaged navier–stokes modeling of flows over a sd7003 airfoil. Physics of Fluids, 34(11):117105, 2022a.
  3. Quantification of reynolds-averaged-navier–stokes model-form uncertainty in transitional boundary layer and airfoil flows. Physics of Fluids, 34(10):107101, 2022b.
  4. Data-assisted combustion simulations with dynamic submodel assignment using random forests. Combustion and Flame, 227:172–185, 2021.
  5. Interpretable data-driven methods for subgrid-scale closure in les for transcritical lox/gch4 combustion. Combustion and Flame, 239:111758, 2022.
  6. Optimization under turbulence model uncertainty for aerospace design. Physics of Fluids, 31(10):105111, 2019.
  7. Robust shape optimization under model uncertainty of an aircraft wing using proper orthogonal decomposition and inductive design exploration method. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 66(4):93, 2023.
  8. Turbulence modeling in the age of data. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 51:357–377, 2019.
  9. Modeling of structural uncertainties in reynolds-averaged navier-stokes closures. Physics of Fluids, 25(11):110822, 2013.
  10. Epistemic uncertainty quantification for reynolds-averaged navier-stokes modeling of separated flows over streamlined surfaces. Physics of Fluids, 31(3):035101, 2019.
  11. Data driven physics constrained perturbations for turbulence model uncertainty estimation. In AAAI Spring Symposium: MLPS, 2021a.
  12. Estimating rans model uncertainty using machine learning. Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society, 2021(May):1–14, 2021b.
  13. Eigenspace perturbations for uncertainty estimation of single-point turbulence closures. Physical Review Fluids, 2(2):024605, 2017.
  14. Approach for uncertainty of turbulence modeling based on data assimilation technique. Computers & Fluids, 85:2–7, 2013.
  15. Progress in the development of a reynolds-stress turbulence closure. Journal of fluid mechanics, 68(3):537–566, 1975.
  16. Evaluation of physics constrained data-driven methods for turbulence model uncertainty quantification. Computers & Fluids, 255:105837, 2023.
  17. Rans predictions for high-speed flows using enveloping models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.01699, 2017a.
  18. Uncertainty estimation for reynolds-averaged navier–stokes predictions of high-speed aircraft nozzle jets. AIAA Journal, 55(11):3999–4004, 2017b.
  19. Estimating uncertainty in homogeneous turbulence evolution due to coarse-graining. Physics of Fluids, 31(2):025106, 2019a.
  20. Uncertainty estimation module for turbulence model predictions in su2. AIAA Journal, 57(3):1066–1077, 2019b.
  21. Design exploration and optimization under uncertainty. Physics of Fluids, 32(8):085106, 2020.
  22. Multi-fidelity modeling of probabilistic aerodynamic databases for use in aerospace engineering. International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 10(5), 2020.
  23. A toolset for creation of multi-fidelity probabilistic aerodynamic databases. In AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, pp.  0466, 2021.
  24. Pope, S. B. Turbulent flows, 2001.
  25. Righi, M. Uncertainties quantification in the prediction of the aeroelastic response of the pazy wing tunnel model. In AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum, pp.  0761, 2023.
  26. Smith, R. C. Uncertainty quantification: theory, implementation, and applications, volume 12. Siam, 2013.
  27. Modelling the pressure–strain correlation of turbulence: an invariant dynamical systems approach. Journal of fluid mechanics, 227:245–272, 1991.
  28. A first course in turbulence. MIT press, 1972.
  29. Eigenvector perturbation methodology for uncertainty quantification of turbulence models. Physical Review Fluids, 4(4):044603, 2019.
  30. A hybrid approach combining dns and rans simulations to quantify uncertainties in turbulence modelling. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 89:885–906, 2021.
  31. Physics-informed machine learning approach for augmenting turbulence models: A comprehensive framework. Physical Review Fluids, 3(7):074602, 2018.
  32. Quantifying and reducing model-form uncertainties in reynolds-averaged navier–stokes simulations: A data-driven, physics-informed bayesian approach. Journal of Computational Physics, 324:115–136, 2016.
  33. Adaptive model refinement approach for bayesian uncertainty quantification in turbulence model. AIAA Journal, pp.  1–15, 2022.
  34. Zhang, H. Turbulent and Non-Turbulent Interfaces in Low Mach Number Airfoil Flows. PhD thesis, Queen’s University (Canada), 2021.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 0 likes.