Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Mean-field limit of 2D stationary particle systems with signed Coulombian interactions (2404.13433v1)

Published 20 Apr 2024 in math.AP

Abstract: We study the mean-field limits of critical points of interaction energies with Coulombian singularity. An important feature of our setting is that we allow interaction between particles of opposite signs. Particles of opposite signs attract each other whereas particles of the same signs repel each other. In 2D, we prove that the associated empirical measures converge to a limiting measure $\mu$ that satisfies a two-fold criticality condition: in velocity form or in vorticity form. Our setting includes the stationary attraction-repulsion problem with Coulombian singularity and the stationary system of point-vortices in fluid mechanics. In this last context, in the case where the limiting measure is in $H{-1}_{\text{loc}}({\mathbb R}2)$, we recover the classical criticality condition stating that $\nabla\perp g \ast \mu$, with $g(x)=-\log |x|$, is a stationary solution of the incompressible Euler equation. This result, is, to the best of our knowledge, new in the case of particles with different signs (for particles of the positive sign it was obtained by Schochet in 1996). In order to derive the limiting criticality condition in the velocity form, we follow an approach devised by Sandier-Serfaty in the context of Ginzburg-Landau vortices. This consists of passing to the limit in the stress-energy tensor associated with the velocity field. On the other hand, the criticality condition in the vorticity form is obtained by arguments closer to the ones of Schochet.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (42)
  1. Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 2000.
  2. Critical weak-Lpsuperscript𝐿𝑝L^{p}italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT differentiability of singular integrals. Rev. Mat. Iberoam., 36(7):2033–2072, 2020.
  3. H. Aref. Point vortex dynamics: a classical mathematics playground. J. Math. Phys., 48(6):065401, 23, 2007.
  4. Dimensionality of local minimizers of the interaction energy. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 209(3):1055–1088, 2013.
  5. R. J. Berman and M. Önnheim. Propagation of chaos for a class of first order models with singular mean field interactions. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 51(1):159–196, 2019.
  6. Ginzburg-Landau vortices. Modern Birkhäuser Classics. Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham, 2017. Reprint of the 1994 edition [ MR1269538].
  7. F. Bethuel and J.-M. Ghidaglia. Weak limits of solutions to the steady incompressible two-dimensional Euler equation in a bounded domain. Asymptotic Anal., 8(3):277–291, 1994.
  8. V. I. Bogachev. Weak convergence of measures, volume 234 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2018.
  9. Mean field limit and quantitative estimates with singular attractive kernels. Duke Math. J., 172(13):2591–2641, 2023.
  10. Existence of compactly supported global minimisers for the interaction energy. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 217(3):1197–1217, 2015.
  11. Discrete minimisers are close to continuum minimisers for the interaction energy. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 57(1):Paper No. 24, 35, 2018.
  12. A review on attractive-repulsive hydrodynamics for consensus in collective behavior. In Active particles. Vol. 1. Advances in theory, models, and applications, Model. Simul. Sci. Eng. Technol., pages 259–298. Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham, 2017.
  13. Regularity of local minimizers of the interaction energy via obstacle problems. Comm. Math. Phys., 343(3):747–781, 2016.
  14. A mass-transportation approach to a one dimensional fluid mechanics model with nonlocal velocity. Adv. Math., 231(1):306–327, 2012.
  15. Geometry of minimizers for the interaction energy with mildly repulsive potentials. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire, 34(5):1299–1308, 2017.
  16. The equilibrium measure for an anisotropic nonlocal energy. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 60(3):Paper No. 109, 28, 2021.
  17. Pressureless Euler with nonlocal interactions as a singular limit of degenerate Navier-Stokes system. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 492(1):124400, 27, 2020.
  18. J.-M. Delort. Existence de nappes de tourbillon en dimension deux. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 4(3):553–586, 1991.
  19. R. J. DiPerna and A. Majda. Reduced Hausdorff dimension and concentration-cancellation for two-dimensional incompressible flow. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 1(1):59–95, 1988.
  20. L. C. Evans. Weak convergence methods for nonlinear partial differential equations, volume 74 of CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics. Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC; by the American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1990.
  21. Measure theory and fine properties of functions. Textbooks in Mathematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, revised edition, 2015.
  22. M. Fabisiak and J. Peszek. Inevitable monokineticity of strongly singular alignment. Math. Ann., 2023.
  23. O. Frostman. Potentiel d’équilibre et capacité des ensembles avec quelques applications à la théorie des fonctions. Lund: Diss. 118 S. (1935)., 1935.
  24. D. Gilbarg and N. S. Trudinger. Elliptic partial differential equations of second order. Classics in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001. Reprint of the 1998 edition.
  25. Convergence of the point vortex method for the 2222-D Euler equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 43(3):415–430, 1990.
  26. M. Hauray. Wasserstein distances for vortices approximation of Euler-type equations. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 19(8):1357–1384, 2009.
  27. Explicit minimisers for anisotropic Coulomb energies in 3D. Adv. Math., 434:Paper No. 109333, 28, 2023.
  28. The equilibrium measure for a nonlocal dislocation energy. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 72(1):136–158, 2019.
  29. Mean-field limits of Riesz-type singular flows. Ars Inven. Anal., pages Paper No. 4, 45, 2022.
  30. A. C. Ponce. Elliptic PDEs, measures and capacities, volume 23 of EMS Tracts in Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich, 2016. From the Poisson equations to nonlinear Thomas-Fermi problems.
  31. R. Rodiac. Stability conditions for mean-field limiting vorticities of the Ginzburg-Landau equations in 2d. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.01172.
  32. R. Rodiac. Regularity properties of stationary harmonic functions whose Laplacian is a radon measure. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 48(4):2495–2531, 2016.
  33. R. Rodiac. Description of limiting vorticities for the magnetic 2D Ginzburg-Landau equations. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire, 36(3):783–809, 2019.
  34. M. Rosenzweig. Mean-field convergence of point vortices to the incompressible Euler equation with vorticity in L∞superscript𝐿L^{\infty}italic_L start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 243(3):1361–1431, 2022.
  35. M. Rosenzweig and S. Serfaty. Global-in-time mean-field convergence for singular Riesz-type diffusive flows. Ann. Appl. Probab., 33(2):754–798, 2023.
  36. E. Sandier and S. Serfaty. Limiting vorticities for the Ginzburg-Landau equations. Duke Math. J., 117(3):403–446, 2003.
  37. E. Sandier and S. Serfaty. Vortices in the magnetic Ginzburg-Landau model, volume 70 of Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2007.
  38. F. Santambrogio. Optimal transport for applied mathematicians, volume 87 of Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications. Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham, 2015. Calculus of variations, PDEs, and modeling.
  39. S. Schochet. The weak vorticity formulation of the 2222-D Euler equations and concentration-cancellation. Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 20(5-6):1077–1104, 1995.
  40. S. Schochet. The point-vortex method for periodic weak solutions of the 2-D Euler equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 49(9):911–965, 1996.
  41. S. Serfaty. Coulomb gases and Ginzburg-Landau vortices. Zurich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich, 2015.
  42. S. Serfaty. Mean field limit for Coulomb-type flows. Duke Math. J., 169(15):2887–2935, 2020. With an appendix by Mitia Duerinckx and Serfaty.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Slide Deck Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Whiteboard

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.