Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 33 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 74 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 188 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 362 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 34 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Learning Chemotherapy Drug Action via Universal Physics-Informed Neural Networks (2404.08019v1)

Published 11 Apr 2024 in q-bio.QM, cs.LG, and physics.chem-ph

Abstract: Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) is widely used to assess drug effects and toxicity before the drug goes to clinical trial. However, significant manual distillation of the literature is needed in order to construct a QSP model. Parameters may need to be fit, and simplifying assumptions of the model need to be made. In this work, we apply Universal Physics-Informed Neural Networks (UPINNs) to learn unknown components of various differential equations that model chemotherapy pharmacodynamics. We learn three commonly employed chemotherapeutic drug actions (log-kill, Norton-Simon, and E_max) from synthetic data. Then, we use the UPINN method to fit the parameters for several synthetic datasets simultaneously. Finally, we learn the net proliferation rate in a model of doxorubicin (a chemotherapeutic) pharmacodynamics. As these are only toy examples, we highlight the usefulness of UPINNs in learning unknown terms in pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic models.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. Efficient generation and selection of virtual populations in quantitative systems pharmacology models. CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 5(3):140–146, 2016.
  2. A gentle introduction to conformal prediction and distribution-free uncertainty quantification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.07511, 2021.
  3. Modelling cell death in human tumour cell lines exposed to the anticancer drug paclitaxel. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 49:329–357, 2004.
  4. A proposed fractional-order gompertz model and its application to tumour growth data. Mathematical medicine and biology: a journal of the IMA, 32(2):187–209, 2015.
  5. Next-generation machine learning for biological networks. Cell, 173(7):1581–1592, 2018.
  6. A framework for simplification of quantitative systems pharmacology models in clinical pharmacology. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 88(4):1430–1440, 2022.
  7. Experimental data-driven tumor modeling for chemotherapy. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53(2):16245–16250, 2020.
  8. Reinforcement learning derived chemotherapeutic schedules for robust patient-specific therapy. Scientific Reports, 11(1):17882, 2021.
  9. Patient-specific logic models of signaling pathways from screenings on cancer biopsies to prioritize personalized combination therapies. Molecular systems biology, 16(2):e8664, 2020.
  10. Extended physics-informed neural networks (xpinns): A generalized space-time domain decomposition based deep learning framework for nonlinear partial differential equations. Communications in Computational Physics, 28(5), 2020.
  11. Experimentally-driven mathematical modeling to improve combination targeted and cytotoxic therapy for her2+ breast cancer. Scientific reports, 9(1):12830, 2019.
  12. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
  13. Mathematical modeling of ovarian cancer treatments: sequencing of surgery and chemotherapy. Journal of theoretical biology, 242(1):62–68, 2006.
  14. On the limited memory bfgs method for large scale optimization. Mathematical programming, 45(1-3):503–528, 1989.
  15. A predictive mathematical modeling approach for the study of doxorubicin treatment in triple negative breast cancer. Scientific reports, 7(1):5725, 2017.
  16. Optimal control applied to competing chemotherapeutic cell-kill strategies. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 63(6):1954–1971, 2003.
  17. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
  18. A pinn approach to symbolic differential operator discovery with sparse data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04630, 2022.
  19. Better prediction of the local concentration–effect relationship: the role of physiologically based pharmacokinetics and quantitative systems pharmacology and toxicology in the evolution of model-informed drug discovery and development. Drug discovery today, 24(7):1344–1354, 2019.
  20. Systems biology informed neural networks (sbinn) predict response and novel combinations for pd-1 checkpoint blockade. Communications Biology, 4(1):877, 2021.
  21. Integrative computational approach identifies drug targets in cd4+ t-cell-mediated immune disorders. NPJ systems biology and applications, 7(1):4, 2021.
  22. Universal differential equations for scientific machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.04385, 2020.
  23. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378:686–707, 2019.
  24. Quantitative and systems pharmacology in the post-genomic era: new approaches to discovering drugs and understanding therapeutic mechanisms. In An NIH white paper by the QSP workshop group, volume 48, pages 1–47. NIH Bethesda Bethesda, MD, 2011.
  25. Optimizing chemotherapy dose and schedule by norton-simon mathematical modeling. Breast disease, 31(1):7–18, 2010.
  26. Ai feynman: A physics-inspired method for symbolic regression. Science Advances, 6(16):eaay2631, 2020.
  27. Model-informed drug development: current us regulatory practice and future considerations. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 105(4):899–911, 2019.
  28. Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters. Biostatistics, 20(2):273–286, 2019.
  29. B-pinns: Bayesian physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse pde problems with noisy data. Journal of Computational Physics, 425:109913, 2021.
  30. Two heads are better than one: current landscape of integrating qsp and machine learning: an isop qsp sig white paper by the working group on the integration of quantitative systems pharmacology and machine learning. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, 49(1):5–18, 2022.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 1 like.