Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 43 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 180 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 443 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 32 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Impossibility of universal work extraction from coherence: Reconciling axiomatic and resource-theory approaches (2404.07786v1)

Published 11 Apr 2024 in quant-ph

Abstract: We compare how the impossibility of a universal work extractor from coherence arises from different approaches to quantum thermodynamics: an explicit protocol accounting for all relevant quantum resources, and axiomatic, information-theoretic constraints imposed by constructor theory. We first explain how the impossibility of a universal work extractor from coherence is directly implied by a recently proposed constructor-theoretic theorem based on distinguishability, which is scale- and dynamics- independent. Then we give an explicit demonstration of this result within quantum theory, by proving the impossibility of generalising a proposed quantum protocol for deterministically extracting work from coherence. We demonstrate a new connection between the impossibility of universal work extractors and constructor-based irreversibility, which was recently shown using the quantum homogenizer. Finally we discuss additional avenues for applying the constructor-theoretic formulation of work extraction to quantum thermodynamics, including the irreversibility of quantum computation and thermodynamics of multiple conserved quantities.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (46)
  1. Rudolf Clausius “Über eine veränderte Form des zweiten Hauptsatzes der mechanischen Wärmetheorie” In Annalen der Physik 169.12 WILEY-VCH Verlag Leipzig, 1854, pp. 481–506
  2. William Thomson “II. On the dynamical theory of heat, with numerical results deduced from Mr. Joule’s equivalent of a thermal unit, and M. Regnault’s observations on steam” In The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 4.22 Taylor & Francis, 1852, pp. 8–21
  3. Constantin Carathéodory “Über den Variabilitätsbereich der Koeffizienten von Potenzreihen, die gegebene Werte nicht annehmen” In Mathematische Annalen 64.1 Springer, 1907, pp. 95–115
  4. R Giles “Mathematical Foundations of Thermodynamics” In Pergamon, 1964
  5. Elliott H Lieb and Jakob Yngvason “The physics and mathematics of the second law of thermodynamics” In Physics Reports 310.1 Elsevier, 1999, pp. 1–96 DOI: 10.1016/S0370-1573(98)00082-9
  6. “Quantum thermodynamics” In Contemporary Physics 57.4 Taylor & Francis, 2016, pp. 545–579 DOI: 10.1080/00107514.2016.1201896
  7. “Resource theory of quantum states out of thermal equilibrium” arXiv:1111.3882 In Physical Review Letters 111.25 APS, 2013, pp. 250404 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.250404
  8. Nelly Huei Ying Ng and Mischa Prebin Woods “Resource theory of quantum thermodynamics: Thermal operations and second laws” In Thermodynamics in the quantum regime: Fundamental aspects and new directions Springer, 2019, pp. 625–650 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99046-0˙26
  9. David Deutsch “Constructor theory” In Synthese 190.18 Springer, 2013, pp. 4331–4359 DOI: 10.1007/s11229-013-0279-z
  10. “Constructor theory of information” In Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 471.2174 The Royal Society Publishing, 2015, pp. 20140540 DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2014.0540
  11. “The extraction of work from quantum coherence” arXiv:1506.07875 In New Journal of Physics 18.2 IOP Publishing, 2016, pp. 023045 DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/18/2/023045
  12. Chiara Marletto “The information-theoretic foundation of thermodynamic work extraction” arXiv:2009.04588 In Journal of Physics Communications 6.5 IOP Publishing, 2022, pp. 055012 DOI: 10.1088/2399-6528/ac70a7
  13. “Irreversibility beyond Landauer’s principle: is it possible to perform erasure using the quantum homogenizer?” In New Journal of Physics 24.11 IOP Publishing, 2022, pp. 113030 DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ac9e13
  14. “Emergence of constructor-based irreversibility in quantum systems: theory and experiment” In Physical Review Letters 128.8 APS, 2022, pp. 080401 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.080401
  15. “The thermodynamic cost of quantum operations” In New Journal of Physics 18.11 IOP Publishing, 2016, pp. 113050 DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/18/11/113050
  16. Bob Coecke, Tobias Fritz and Robert W Spekkens “A mathematical theory of resources” In Information and Computation 250 Elsevier, 2016, pp. 59–86 DOI: 10.1016/j.ic.2016.02.008
  17. “Fundamental limitations for quantum and nanoscale thermodynamics” In Nature Communications 4.1 Nature Publishing Group UK London, 2013, pp. 2059 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3059
  18. “Limits to catalysis in quantum thermodynamics” In New Journal of Physics 17.8 IOP Publishing, 2015, pp. 085004 DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/17/8/085004
  19. “The second laws of quantum thermodynamics” In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112.11 National Acad Sciences, 2015, pp. 3275–3279 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1411728112
  20. Johan Åberg “Truly work-like work extraction via a single-shot analysis” In Nature Communications 4.1 Nature Publishing Group UK London, 2013, pp. 1925 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2712
  21. Paul Skrzypczyk, Anthony J Short and Sandu Popescu “Work extraction and thermodynamics for individual quantum systems” In Nature Communications 5.1 Nature Publishing Group UK London, 2014, pp. 4185 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5185
  22. Joseph M Renes “Work cost of thermal operations in quantum thermodynamics” In The European Physical Journal Plus 129 Springer, 2014, pp. 1–7 DOI: 10.1140/epjp/i2014-14153-8
  23. Chiara Marletto “Constructor theory of thermodynamics” In arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.02625, 2016
  24. “Witnessing nonclassicality beyond quantum theory” In Physical Review D 102.8 APS, 2020, pp. 086012 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.086012
  25. Giuseppe Di Pietra and Chiara Marletto “Temporal witnesses of non-classicality and conservation laws” In Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 56.26 IOP Publishing, 2023, pp. 265305 DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/acda6b
  26. “Fundamental limits on correlated catalytic state transformations” In Physical Review Letters 129.12 APS, 2022, pp. 120506 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.120506
  27. “Axiomatic relation between thermodynamic and information-theoretic entropies” In Physical Review Letters 117.26 APS, 2016, pp. 260601 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.260601
  28. Dominik Šafránek, Dario Rosa and Felix C Binder “Work extraction from unknown quantum sources” In Physical Review Letters 130.21 APS, 2023, pp. 210401 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.210401
  29. Johan Åberg “Catalytic coherence” In Physical Review Letters 113.15 APS, 2014, pp. 150402 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.150402
  30. “Coherence and measurement in quantum thermodynamics” arXiv:quant-ph/1503.00577 In Scientific Reports 6 Nature Publishing Group, 2016, pp. 22174 DOI: 10.1038/srep22174
  31. Richard Jozsa “Fidelity for mixed quantum states” In Journal of modern optics 41.12 Taylor & Francis, 1994, pp. 2315–2323 DOI: 10.1080/09500349414552171
  32. “All states are universal catalysts in quantum thermodynamics” In Physical Review X 11.1 APS, 2021, pp. 011061 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.011061
  33. “Diluting quantum information: An analysis of information transfer in system-reservoir interactions” In Physical Review A 65.4 APS, 2002, pp. 042105 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.042105
  34. “Transforming pure and mixed states using an NMR quantum homogenizer” In Physical Review A 103.2 APS, 2021, pp. 022414 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.103.022414
  35. Benjamin Schumacher “Quantum coding” In Physical Review A 51.4 APS, 1995, pp. 2738 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.51.2738
  36. “Operational resource theory of coherence” In Physical Review Letters 116.12 APS, 2016, pp. 120404 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.120404
  37. Tillmann Baumgratz, Marcus Cramer and Martin B Plenio “Quantifying coherence” In Physical Review Letters 113.14 APS, 2014, pp. 140401 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.140401
  38. “(Quantumness in the context of) resource theories” In International Journal of Modern Physics B 27.01n03 World Scientific, 2013, pp. 1345019 DOI: 10.1142/S0217979213450197
  39. “Quantum resource theories” In Reviews of modern physics 91.2 APS, 2019, pp. 025001 DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.025001
  40. “Thermodynamics of quantum systems with multiple conserved quantities” In Nature Communications 7.1 Nature Publishing Group UK London, 2016, pp. 12049 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12049
  41. “The first law of general quantum resource theories” In Quantum 4, 2020, pp. 259 DOI: 10.22331/q-2020-04-30-259
  42. Matteo Lostaglio, David Jennings and Terry Rudolph “Thermodynamic resource theories, non-commutativity and maximum entropy principles” In New Journal of Physics 19.4 IOP Publishing, 2017, pp. 043008 DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aa617f
  43. “Microcanonical and resource-theoretic derivations of the thermal state of a quantum system with noncommuting charges” In Nature Communications 7.1 Nature Publishing Group, 2016, pp. 1–7 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12051
  44. “No second law of entanglement manipulation after all” In Nature Physics 19.2 Nature Publishing Group UK London, 2023, pp. 184–189 DOI: 10.1038/s41567-022-01873-9
  45. “Constructor Theory as Process Theory” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.05364, 2023
  46. Joan A Vaccaro, Sarah Croke and Stephen M Barnett “Is coherence catalytic?” In Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 51.41 IOP Publishing, 2018, pp. 414008 DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/aac112

Summary

  • The paper establishes that universal work extraction from quantum coherence is impossible within both resource-theory and constructor-theory frameworks.
  • It demonstrates that deterministic work extraction requires orthogonal initial states due to the inherent limitations in distinguishing non-orthogonal states, leading to the work-locking phenomenon.
  • The analysis paves the way for extending quantum thermodynamic principles to other conserved quantities and unifying disparate theoretical approaches.

Overview of "Impossibility of Universal Work Extraction from Coherence: Reconciling Axiomatic and Resource-theory Approaches"

This paper examines two prominent frameworks in quantum thermodynamics—resource theories and constructor theory—to address the challenges in universal work extraction from quantum coherence. The authors, Plesnik and Violaris, explore the intricacies of these frameworks to understand the limitations of work extraction protocols in quantum systems, grounding their investigation in both dynamical and axiomatic thermodynamics.

Key Contributions

The paper's primary contribution is establishing the impossibility of devising a universal work extraction mechanism from quantum coherence within the frameworks of both resource theories and constructor theory. The authors explore and compare these approaches:

  1. Resource Theories vs. Constructor Theory: The paper contrasts the resource-theoretic and constructor-theoretic views on thermodynamics. Resource theories focus on transformations permissible under existing physical laws and are instrumental in quantifying resources such as coherence. Conversely, constructor theory posits a more foundational perspective, emphasizing possible and impossible tasks without presupposing specific dynamical laws.
  2. Theorem on Distinguishability: A crucial result from the constructor-theoretic framework is that deterministic work extraction demands initial quantum states to be orthogonal, as inferred from a dynamics-independent theorem. This restriction stems from the inability to perfectly distinguish non-orthogonal states in a single shot, thereby constraining universal work extraction processes.
  3. Analysis of Work-locking Phenomenon: The authors address the "work-locking" phenomenon, wherein the additional free energy in coherent states is not accessible without auxiliary coherent resources. By analyzing a proposed protocol for work extraction \cite{korzekwa2016extraction}, they demonstrate its failure to generalize across non-orthogonal input states, supporting their impossibility theorem.
  4. Implications of Quantum Homogenizers: They explore the potential of quantum homogenizers as a candidate for constructing devices capable of approximating the task under discussion. The results indicate that even with the introduction of sophisticated resources like homogenizers, transforming arbitrary mixed to pure states remains constructor-theoretically impossible, reinforcing the constraints established by their theorem.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of this research are significant for theoretical advancements in quantum thermodynamics and practical quantum computing:

  • Entropy and Irreversibility: The constraints indicate fundamental limits on entropy changes in non-classical computation tasks, hinting at an underlying form of irreversibility. Future research could further explore the intersection of these constraints with known limits like Landauer's principle, potentially yielding a broader framework for understanding the irreversibility inherent in quantum computation.
  • Extension to General Conserved Quantities: The paper suggests that the approach could facilitate the extension of thermodynamic principles to other conserved quantities beyond energy. This could unravel new connections between distinct resources conserved in quantum systems and unify current isolated observations under a broader thermodynamic perspective.
  • Potential for Unification: By illustrating converging conclusions from disparate frameworks, this work paves the way for reconciling resource-theoretic and axiomatic approaches with constructive principles, moving towards a cohesive theory of quantum thermodynamics.

This paper thus advances our understanding of the theoretical limitations inherent in quantum resource manipulation and sets a foundation for further inquiry into both the fundamental laws governing quantum systems and their practical utility in emerging quantum technologies.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 3 posts and received 43 likes.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com