Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Impact of the Magnetic Horizon on the Interpretation of the Pierre Auger Observatory Spectrum and Composition Data

Published 4 Apr 2024 in astro-ph.HE | (2404.03533v2)

Abstract: The flux of ultra-high energy cosmic rays reaching Earth above the ankle energy (5 EeV) can be described as a mixture of nuclei injected by extragalactic sources with very hard spectra and a low rigidity cutoff. Extragalactic magnetic fields existing between the Earth and the closest sources can affect the observed CR spectrum by reducing the flux of low-rigidity particles reaching Earth. We perform a combined fit of the spectrum and distributions of depth of shower maximum measured with the Pierre Auger Observatory including the effect of this magnetic horizon in the propagation of UHECRs in the intergalactic space. We find that, within a specific range of the various experimental and phenomenological systematics, the magnetic horizon effect can be relevant for turbulent magnetic field strengths in the local neighbourhood of order $B_{\rm rms}\simeq (50-100)\,{\rm nG}\,(20\rm{Mpc}/{d_{\rm s})( 100\,\rm{kpc}/L_{\rm coh}}){1/2}$, with $d_{\rm s}$ the typical intersource separation and $L_{\rm coh}$ the magnetic field coherence length. When this is the case, the inferred slope of the source spectrum becomes softer and can be closer to the expectations of diffusive shock acceleration, i.e., $\propto E{-2}$. An additional cosmic-ray population with higher source density and softer spectra, presumably also extragalactic and dominating the cosmic-ray flux at EeV energies, is also required to reproduce the overall spectrum and composition results for all energies down to 0.6~EeV.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (18)
  1. A. Yushkov (for the Pierre Auger Collaboration), PoS(ICRC2019)482
  2. M. Kachelriess and D.V. Semikoz, Phys. Lett. B 634 (2006) 143
  3. R. Aloisio and V. Berezinsky, Astrophys. J. 612 (2004) 900
  4. S. Mollerach and E. Roulet, JCAP 10 (2013) 013
  5. D. Wittkowski (for the Pierre Auger Collaboration), PoS(ICRC2017)563
  6. S. Mollerach and E. Roulet, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 103024
  7. J. González (for the Pierre Auger Collaboration), PoS(ICRC2023)288
  8. A.M. Hopkins and J.F. Beacom, Astrophys. J. 651 (2006) 142
  9. M. Lemoine, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 083007
  10. V. Berezinsky and A.Z. Gazizov, Astrophys. J. 669 (2007) 684
  11. V. Berezinsky, Advances in Space Research 41 (2008) 2071
  12. S. Mollerach and E. Roulet, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 103010
  13. B. Eichmann and M. Kachelriess, JCAP 02 (2023) 053
  14. M. Haverkorn, Astrophysics and Space Science Library (2015) 407
  15. J.P. Vallée, New Astronomy Reviews 55 (2011) 91
  16. R. Durrer and A. Neronov, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review 21 (2013) 62
  17. F. James and M. Roos, Comput. Phys. Commun. 10 (1975) 343  
  18. J.P. Vallée, The Astron. J. 124 (2002) 1322
Citations (4)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 1 like about this paper.