Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 171 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 60 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 188 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 437 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Design of Stickbug: a Six-Armed Precision Pollination Robot (2404.03489v1)

Published 4 Apr 2024 in cs.RO

Abstract: This work presents the design of Stickbug, a six-armed, multi-agent, precision pollination robot that combines the accuracy of single-agent systems with swarm parallelization in greenhouses. Precision pollination robots have often been proposed to offset the effects of a decreasing population of natural pollinators, but they frequently lack the required parallelization and scalability. Stickbug achieves this by allowing each arm and drive base to act as an individual agent, significantly reducing planning complexity. Stickbug uses a compact holonomic Kiwi drive to navigate narrow greenhouse rows, a tall mast to support multiple manipulators and reach plant heights, a detection model and classifier to identify Bramble flowers, and a felt-tipped end-effector for contact-based pollination. Initial experimental validation demonstrates that Stickbug can attempt over 1.5 pollinations per minute with a 50% success rate. Additionally, a Bramble flower perception dataset was created and is publicly available alongside Stickbug's software and design files.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (39)
  1. C. Brittain, C. Kremen, and A.-M. Klein, “Biodiversity buffers pollination from changes in environmental conditions,” Global Change Biology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 540–547, 2013.
  2. X. Lei, Q. Yuan, T. Xyu, Y. Qi, J. Zeng, K. Huang, Y. Sun, A. Herbst, and X. Lyu, “Technologies and equipment of mechanized blossom thinning in orchards: A review,” Agronomy, vol. 13, no. 11, 2023.
  3. U. Weiss and P. Biber, “Plant detection and mapping for agricultural robots using a 3d lidar sensor,” Robotics and autonomous systems, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 265–273, 2011.
  4. F. A. Cheein, G. Steiner, G. P. Paina, and R. Carelli, “Optimized eif-slam algorithm for precision agriculture mapping based on stems detection,” Computers and electronics in agriculture, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 195–207, 2011.
  5. J. M. Peña, J. Torres-Sánchez, A. I. de Castro, M. Kelly, and F. López-Granados, “Weed mapping in early-season maize fields using object-based analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle (uav) images,” PloS one, vol. 8, no. 10, p. e77151, 2013.
  6. T. Mueller-Sim, M. Jenkins, J. Abel, and G. Kantor, “The robotanist: A ground-based agricultural robot for high-throughput crop phenotyping,” in 2017 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA).   IEEE, 2017, pp. 3634–3639.
  7. J. Gallmann, B. Schüpbach, N. Kirchgessner, and H. Aasen, “Flower mapping in grasslands with drones and deep learning,” Frontiers in plant science, vol. 12, p. 774965, 2022.
  8. M. A. Broussard, M. Coates, and P. Martinsen, “Artificial pollination technologies: A review,” Agronomy, vol. 13, no. 5, 2023.
  9. J. Barnett, M. Seabright, H. Williams, M. Nejati, A. Scarfe, J. Bell, M. Jones, P. Martinsen, P. Schaare, and M. Duke, “Robotic pollination-targeting kiwifruit flowers for commercial application,” 06 2017.
  10. M. A. S. Alyafei, A. A. Dakheel, M. Almoosa, and Z. F. R. Ahmed, “Innovative and effective spray method for artificial pollination of date palm using drone,” HortScience, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1298 – 1305, 2022.
  11. X. Yang and E. Miyako, “Soap bubble pollination,” iScience, vol. 23, no. 6, p. 101188, 2020.
  12. N. Wu, W. Cowles, and A. Kudelin, “Addressing greenhouse’s lack of natural pollinators - a uav-based artificial pollination system,” in 2021 17th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS), 2021, pp. 314–318.
  13. A. Pourmohammadian, A. Talaeizadeh, A. Alasty, A. Mostaan, A. Torahi, M. Shahrooz, and S. Arab, “An aerial pollination system for agricultural multi-rotors,” in 2022 10th RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICRoM), 2022, pp. 273–278.
  14. N. Masuda, M. M. Khalil, S. Toda, K. Takayama, A. Kanada, and T. Mashimo, “Development of a flexible multi-degrees-of-freedom robot for plant pollination,” in 2024 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), 2024, pp. 416–421.
  15. T. Shaneyfelt, M. M. Jamshidi, and S. Agaian, “A vision feedback robotic docking crane system with application to vanilla pollination,” International Journal of Automation and Control, vol. 7, no. 1-2, pp. 62–82, 2013.
  16. H. Williams, M. Nejati, S. Hussein, N. Penhall, J. Y. Lim, M. H. Jones, J. Bell, H. S. Ahn, S. Bradley, P. Schaare, P. Martinsen, M. Alomar, P. Patel, M. Seabright, M. Duke, A. Scarfe, and B. MacDonald, “Autonomous pollination of individual kiwifruit flowers: Toward a robotic kiwifruit pollinator,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 246–262, 2020.
  17. K. Ahmad, J.-E. Park, T. Ilyas, J.-H. Lee, J.-H. Lee, S. Kim, and H. Kim, “Accurate and robust pollinations for watermelons using intelligence guided visual servoing,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 219, p. 108753, 2024.
  18. T. Yuan, S. Zhang, X. Sheng, D. Wang, Y. Gong, and W. Li, “An autonomous pollination robot for hormone treatment of tomato flower in greenhouse,” in 2016 3rd International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI), 2016, pp. 108–113.
  19. R. Sapkota, D. Ahmed, S. Khanal, U. Bhattarai, C. Mo, M. Whiting, and M. Karkee, “Robotic pollination of apples in commercial orchards,” 10 2023.
  20. F. Xie, Z. Chong, X.-J. Liu, H. Zhao, and J. Wang, “Precise and smooth contact force control for a hybrid mobile robot used in polishing,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 83, p. 102573, 2023.
  21. N. Ohi, K. Lassak, R. Watson, J. Strader, Y. Du, C. Yang, G. Hedrick, J. Nguyen, S. Harper, D. Reynolds et al., “Design of an autonomous precision pollination robot,” in 2018 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS).   IEEE, 2018, pp. 7711–7718.
  22. J. Strader, J. Nguyen, C. Tatsch, Y. Du, K. Lassak, B. Buzzo, R. Watson, H. Cerbone, N. Ohi, C. Yang et al., “Flower interaction subsystem for a precision pollination robot,” in 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).   IEEE, 2019, pp. 5534–5541.
  23. S. A. Chechetka, Y. Yu, M. Tange, and E. Miyako, “Materially engineered artificial pollinators,” Chem, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 224–239, 2017.
  24. N. T. Jafferis, E. F. Helbling, M. Karpelson, and R. J. Wood, “Untethered flight of an insect-sized flapping-wing microscale aerial vehicle,” Nature, vol. 570, no. 7762, pp. 491–495, Jun 2019.
  25. S. Kim, Y.-H. Hsiao, Y. Chen, J. Mao, and Y. Chen, “Firefly: An insect-scale aerial robot powered by electroluminescent soft artificial muscles,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 6950–6957, 2022.
  26. D. Hulens, W. Van Ranst, Y. Cao, and T. Goedemé, “The autonomous pollination drone,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Winter IFSA Conference on Automation, Robotics & Communications for Industry 4, vol. 2, 2022, pp. 38–41.
  27. S. Huffman, “Growing brambles,” https://extension.wvu.edu/lawn-gardening-pests/news/2020/04/01/growing-brambles, West Virginia University, April 2020.
  28. W. Trust, “Bramble (rubus fruticosus),” https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/trees-woods-and-wildlife/plants/wild-flowers/bramble/.
  29. T. R. Smith and R. T. Cook, “Stickbug,” Mar 2024. [Online]. Available: https://grabcad.com/library/stickbug-1
  30. S. M. Killough and F. G. Pin, “Design of an omnidirectional and holonomic wheeled platform prototype,” Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States), Tech. Rep., 1991.
  31. T. R. Smith, C. Tatsch, M. Rijal, J. Beard, R. M. Butts, and A. Chu, “Stickbug software repository,” Mar 2024. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/wvu-robotics/Stickbug_2024.git
  32. T. Shan, B. Englot, D. Meyers, W. Wang, C. Ratti, and R. Daniela, “Lio-sam: Tightly-coupled lidar inertial odometry via smoothing and mapping,” in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).   IEEE, 2020, pp. 5135–5142.
  33. J. Zhang, C. Hu, R. G. Chadha, and S. Singh, “Falco: Fast likelihood-based collision avoidance with extension to human-guided navigation,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1300–1313, 2020.
  34. G. Jocher, A. Chaurasia, and J. Qiu, “Ultralytics YOLO,” Jan. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics
  35. F. Chaumette and S. Hutchinson, “Visual servo control. i. basic approaches,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 82–90, 2006.
  36. S. J. e. a. Dwyer B. Nelson, J. (2022), “Roboflow,” https://roboflow.com/, Roboflow, 2022.
  37. T.-Y. Lin, M. Maire, S. Belongie, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ramanan, P. Dollár, and C. L. Zitnick, “Microsoft coco: Common objects in context,” in Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part V 13.   Springer, 2014, pp. 740–755.
  38. M. Rijal, T. Smith, C. Tatsch, J. Beard, A. Chu, R. M. Butts, N. Waterland, J. Gross, and Y. Gu, “Bramble flower detection and classification dataset for precision pollination,” 2024.
  39. P. Rob Crassweller, “Pollination requirements for various fruits and nuts,” https://extension.psu.edu/pollination-requirements-for-various-fruits-and-nuts, Pennsylvania State University, 2024.
Citations (2)

Summary

  • The paper introduces Stickbug as a multi-agent precision pollination robot that achieves over 1.5 attempts per minute with a 50% success rate.
  • The paper details a novel distributed autonomy system where each of the six manipulators independently optimizes tasks in confined greenhouse environments.
  • The paper highlights the integration of advanced sensing, including YOLOv8 and depth cameras, for effective flower detection and positioning.

An Expert Analysis of "Design of Stickbug: a Six-Armed Precision Pollination Robot"

The paper "Design of Stickbug: a Six-Armed Precision Pollination Robot" provides a comprehensive exploration of the challenges and solutions in developing an autonomous robot for precision pollination in greenhouse environments. As outlined by the authors, the decrease in natural pollinator populations poses significant threats to food security, which necessitates the deployment of robotic pollinators. The paper presents the Stickbug, a novel approach integrating a multi-agent system to enhance pollination efficiency and adaptability.

The design of Stickbug is notably intricate, featuring six manipulators mounted on a central navigation base. Each manipulator functions as an independent agent, facilitating workflow optimization akin to swarm robotics, while maintaining system scalability and reducing planning complexity. The authors highlight that Stickbug's architecture allows it to perform over 1.5 pollination attempts per minute with a success rate of 50%.

Key Architectural Features

Stickbug's design harnesses several critical features:

  1. Kiwi Drive Base: This component ensures the robot is holonomic and agile, able to navigate constrained greenhouse rows efficiently. Such navigation is essential given the limited spatial contexts in which these robots must operate.
  2. Multi-Arm Configuration: The six manipulators are designed to maximize flower-pollination throughput, each equipped with a tailored end-effector setup. This design is particularly effective in handling clusters of bramble flowers, addressing mobility constraints by spatial distribution of tasks.
  3. Distributed Autonomy: The software architecture leverages distributed agents with each manipulator handling its tasks. A referee agent autonomously manages conflicts without centralized control, ensuring the system's responsiveness to dynamic changes and reducing computation overhead.
  4. Sophisticated Sensing and Control: The manipulators host depth cameras and utilize advanced perception algorithms, including a custom-trained YOLOv8 and a binary classifier for flower detection and orientation assessment. These technologies are integral for identifying and positioning flowers effectively.

Experimental Insights

The experimental validation provides insight into Stickbug's operational efficacy. The configuration trials with 1, 2, 4, and 6 arm setups reveal the enhancements in attempt rates, denoting the vital role of parallelization. However, the moderate success rate indicates significant challenges in dynamic object tracking and coordinated movements, where future research could focus on improving manipulation precision and environmental interaction resilience.

Implications and Future Work

Stickbug represents significant progress in the domain of precision agriculture robotics. The deployment of this robot in real-world conditions, post-adaptation for live plants, could yield considerable reductions in agricultural labor dependency and an increase in pollination reliability. The public release of design files and datasets enables broader research engagement, potentially spurring enhancements in robotic pollination tactics.

Future developments should target the refinement of flower detection and tracking algorithms to improve the success rate. Moreover, experiments with live plants could offer insights into the robot's performance under varying environmental conditions, leading to system adjustments that enhance its robustness and efficacy in practical applications.

The Stickbug project underscores the potential of robotic systems in augmenting agricultural processes. By continually adapting these technologies, there's potential for significant contributions to mitigating the challenges posed by declining populations of natural pollinators.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 2 tweets and received 0 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper:

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com