Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Exploring Lightweight Federated Learning for Distributed Load Forecasting (2404.03320v1)

Published 4 Apr 2024 in cs.LG, cs.SY, and eess.SY

Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed learning scheme that enables deep learning to be applied to sensitive data streams and applications in a privacy-preserving manner. This paper focuses on the use of FL for analyzing smart energy meter data with the aim to achieve comparable accuracy to state-of-the-art methods for load forecasting while ensuring the privacy of individual meter data. We show that with a lightweight fully connected deep neural network, we are able to achieve forecasting accuracy comparable to existing schemes, both at each meter source and at the aggregator, by utilising the FL framework. The use of lightweight models further reduces the energy and resource consumption caused by complex deep-learning models, making this approach ideally suited for deployment across resource-constrained smart meter systems. With our proposed lightweight model, we are able to achieve an overall average load forecasting RMSE of 0.17, with the model having a negligible energy overhead of 50 mWh when performing training and inference on an Arduino Uno platform.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. R. Weron, “Electricity price forecasting: A review of the state-of-the-art with a look into the future,” International journal of forecasting, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1030–1081, 2014.
  2. A. Arif, M. Al-Hussain, N. Al-Mutairi, E. Al-Ammar, Y. Khan, and N. Malik, “Experimental study and design of smart energy meter for the smart grid,” in 2013 International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC).   IEEE, 2013, pp. 515–520.
  3. E. Spanò, L. Niccolini, S. Di Pascoli, and G. Iannacconeluca, “Last-meter smart grid embedded in an internet-of-things platform,” IEEE Transactions on smart grid, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 468–476, 2014.
  4. G. Díaz, J. Coto, and J. Gómez-Aleixandre, “Prediction and explanation of the formation of the spanish day-ahead electricity price through machine learning regression,” Applied Energy, vol. 239, pp. 610–625, 2019.
  5. A. R. Khan, A. Mahmood, A. Safdar, Z. A. Khan, and N. A. Khan, “Load forecasting, dynamic pricing and dsm in smart grid: A review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 54, pp. 1311–1322, 2016.
  6. A. Tascikaraoglu and B. M. Sanandaji, “Short-term residential electric load forecasting: A compressive spatio-temporal approach,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 111, pp. 380–392, 2016.
  7. K. Bandara, C. Bergmeir, and S. Smyl, “Forecasting across time series databases using recurrent neural networks on groups of similar series: A clustering approach,” Expert systems with applications, vol. 140, p. 112896, 2020.
  8. F. L. Quilumba, W.-J. Lee, H. Huang, D. Y. Wang, and R. L. Szabados, “Using smart meter data to improve the accuracy of intraday load forecasting considering customer behavior similarities,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 911–918, 2014.
  9. H. Saxena, O. Aponte, and K. T. McConky, “A hybrid machine learning model for forecasting a billing period’s peak electric load days,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1288–1303, 2019.
  10. G. Sideratos, A. Ikonomopoulos, and N. D. Hatziargyriou, “A novel fuzzy-based ensemble model for load forecasting using hybrid deep neural networks,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 178, p. 106025, 2020.
  11. H. J. Sadaei, P. C. d. L. e Silva, F. G. Guimarães, and M. H. Lee, “Short-term load forecasting by using a combined method of convolutional neural networks and fuzzy time series,” Energy, vol. 175, pp. 365–377, 2019.
  12. G. Memarzadeh and F. Keynia, “Short-term electricity load and price forecasting by a new optimal lstm-nn based prediction algorithm,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 192, p. 106995, 2021.
  13. X. Guo, Q. Zhao, D. Zheng, Y. Ning, and Y. Gao, “A short-term load forecasting model of multi-scale cnn-lstm hybrid neural network considering the real-time electricity price,” Energy Reports, vol. 6, pp. 1046–1053, 2020.
  14. M. Sajjad, Z. A. Khan, A. Ullah, T. Hussain, W. Ullah, M. Y. Lee, and S. W. Baik, “A novel cnn-gru-based hybrid approach for short-term residential load forecasting,” Ieee Access, vol. 8, pp. 143 759–143 768, 2020.
  15. S. Wang, X. Wang, S. Wang, and D. Wang, “Bi-directional long short-term memory method based on attention mechanism and rolling update for short-term load forecasting,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 109, pp. 470–479, 2019.
  16. G. Eibl and D. Engel, “Influence of data granularity on smart meter privacy,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 930–939, 2015.
  17. L. AlAbdulkarim and Z. Lukszo, “Impact of privacy concerns on consumers’ acceptance of smart metering in the netherlands,” in 2011 International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, 2011, pp. 287–292.
  18. B. Hu, Y. Gao, L. Liu, and H. Ma, “Federated region-learning: An edge computing based framework for urban environment sensing,” in 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).   IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–7.
  19. S. R. Pfohl, A. M. Dai, and K. Heller, “Federated and differentially private learning for electronic health records,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.05861, 2019.
  20. N. Gholizadeh and P. Musilek, “Federated learning with hyperparameter-based clustering for electrical load forecasting,” Internet of Things, vol. 17, p. 100470, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542660521001104
  21. M. Savi and F. Olivadese, “Short-term energy consumption forecasting at the edge: A federated learning approach,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 95 949–95 969, 2021.
  22. UK Power Networks: SmartMeter Energy Consumption Data in London Households, “https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/smartmeter-energy-use-data-in-london-households,” 2014.
  23. B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y Arcas, “Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data,” in Artificial intelligence and statistics.   PMLR, 2017, pp. 1273–1282.
  24. Z. Shen, J. Ye, A. Kang, H. Hassani, and R. Shokri, “Share your representation only: Guaranteed improvement of the privacy-utility tradeoff in federated learning,” in The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
  25. A. Taïk and S. Cherkaoui, “Electrical load forecasting using edge computing and federated learning,” in ICC 2020-2020 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC).   IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6.
Citations (3)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates a lightweight federated learning method that achieves competitive load forecasting accuracy with an RMSE of 0.17 while minimizing computational overhead.
  • It employs a privacy-preserving, cluster-based approach to train decentralized deep neural networks on smart meter data for short-term predictions.
  • The research validates the model’s scalability and practical deployment on resource-constrained devices, such as Arduino Uno, highlighting its efficiency and robustness.

Exploring Lightweight Federated Learning for Distributed Load Forecasting

Introduction

The exploration of Federated Learning (FL) for distributed load forecasting presents a compelling pivot from centralized approaches, particularly in the field of smart meter data analysis for electricity demand forecasting. The research underscores the strategic shift towards leveraging FL within the constraints of privacy-preserving paradigms and minimizing resources for computation-intensive tasks. By deploying a lean yet effective fully connected deep neural network (DNN) model, this paper bridges the gap between theoretical FL applicability and practical efficiency in real-world smart meter infrastructures.

Federated Learning Framework

The cornerstone of this research lies in its novel approach to applying federated learning for short-term load forecasting. FL's model allows for collaborative, localized training of individual models without sharing sensitive data, addressing significant privacy concerns inherent in centralized systems. The paper elucidates the methodical adaptation of the FL algorithm from previous foundational works, ensuring detailed technical coherence and compatibility. The federated setup enables dynamic updating of both local and global models, reflecting real-time consumption changes while optimizing for non-independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) conditions.

Methodological Detailing

The proposed methodology elucidates a meticulous process starting from the utilization of the London household energy consumption dataset to the formation of training and test sets. Intriguingly, the research employs a clustering approach to group households based on energy consumption characteristics, further enhancing the model’s predictive accuracy by acknowledging spatial and consumption heterogeneity. Such clustering augments FL's effectiveness, providing a nuanced understanding of localized energy patterns.

Lightweight Model Architectural Insights

A pivotal contribution of this paper is the design and implementation of a lightweight DNN within an FL framework tailored for load forecasting. The model's architecture is strategically simplified to ensure feasibility across resource-constrained devices like smart meters. This aspect of the research strikes a balance between model complexity and operational exigency, making it immensely relevant for scalable deployments.

Empirical Evaluation and Insights

This paper presents a comprehensive analytical narrative covering various facets of the FL framework's performance. The empirical analysis reveals that the lightweight model achieves remarkably similar accuracy to more complex FL schemes, with an overall average load forecasting Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.17. Notably, the model demonstrates computational efficiency, showcasing negligible energy overhead on hardware platforms akin to Arduino Uno, which aligns with the practical feasibility of deploying such models in real-world scenarios.

Comparative Analysis

The research doesn't shy away from rigorous comparative analysis, benchmarking its FL approach against existing methodologies. By evaluating the model against centralized setups and other research works, it provides a quantifiable validation of its claims. The model's performance, benchmarked through RMSE and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), competitively positions it as a viable alternative, striking a conscientious balance between accuracy, privacy preservation, and computational frugality.

Conclusions and Forward Look

The investigation concludes on a prophetic note, positing the deployment of lightweight FL models for load forecasting as not just viable but substantially beneficial in addressing privacy, accuracy, and resource consumption concerns. The research hints at a burgeoning field of paper where decentralized learning mechanisms could significantly contribute to smart grid optimization without the encumbrance of privacy violations or resource-intensive computations. The concluding remarks open avenues for future research, particularly in enhancing model accuracy and further minimizing resource overheads, paving the way for widespread adoption in smart grids and beyond.

The thoughtful execution and presentation of this research underscore the maturing landscape of federated learning applications in energy systems, reinforcing the potential of FL to revolutionize how data-driven insights are harnessed in privacy-sensitive, resource-constrained environments.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com