Augmented Reality Warnings in Roadway Work Zones: Evaluating the Effect of Modality on Worker Reaction Times (2403.15571v2)
Abstract: Given the aging highway infrastructure requiring extensive rebuilding and enhancements, and the consequent rise in the number of work zones, there is an urgent need to develop advanced safety systems to protect workers. While Augmented Reality (AR) holds significant potential for delivering warnings to workers, its integration into roadway work zones remains relatively unexplored. The primary objective of this study is to improve safety measures within roadway work zones by conducting an extensive analysis of how different combinations of multimodal AR warnings influence the reaction times of workers. This paper addresses this gap through a series of experiments that aim to replicate the distinctive conditions of roadway work zones, both in real-world and virtual reality environments. Our approach comprises three key components: an advanced AR system prototype, a VR simulation of AR functionality within the work zone environment, and the Wizard of Oz technique to synchronize user experiences across experiments. To assess reaction times, we leverage both the simple reaction time (SRT) technique and an innovative vision-based metric that utilizes real-time pose estimation. By conducting five experiments in controlled outdoor work zones and indoor VR settings, our study provides valuable information on how various multimodal AR warnings impact workers reaction times. Furthermore, our findings reveal the disparities in reaction times between VR simulations and real-world scenarios, thereby gauging VR's capability to mirror the dynamics of roadway work zones. Furthermore, our results substantiate the potential and reliability of vision-based reaction time measurements. These insights resonate well with those derived using the SRT technique, underscoring the viability of this approach for tangible real-world uses.
- N. S. S. Al-Bdairi, “Does time of day matter at highway work zone crashes?” Journal of safety research, vol. 73, pp. 47–56, 2020.
- G. Hou and S. Chen, “Study of work zone traffic safety under adverse driving conditions with a microscopic traffic simulation approach,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 145, p. 105698, 2020.
- CDC, “Highway Work Zone Safety,” https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/highwayworkzones/default.html/, 2019, [Online; accessed 2022].
- Unite the Union, “Workplace fatal injuries in great britain, 2022,” https://resources.unitetheunion.org, published 6 July 2022.
- U.S. Congress. (2021) H.R.3684 - Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. [Online]. Available: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3684
- European Commission - Mobility and Transport, “EU invests €62 billion in sustainable, safe, and efficient transport infrastructure,” June 2023, accessed: March 22, 2024.
- C. Nnaji, J. Gambatese, H. W. Lee, and F. Zhang, “Improving construction work zone safety using technology: A systematic review of applicable technologies,” Journal of traffic and transportation engineering (English edition), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 61–75, 2020.
- S. Sakhakarmi, J. Park, and A. Singh, “Tactile-based wearable system for improved hazard perception of worker and equipment collision,” Automation in Construction, vol. 125, p. 103613, 2021.
- H. Brown and P. Edara, “Use of smart work zone technologies for improving work zone safety,” 2022.
- “Sonoblaster Work Zone Intrusion Alarm and Accessories,” [Online], available at https://www.tapconet.com/product/sonoblaster-work-zone-intrusion-alarm-and-accessories.
- “Intellicone Incursion Prevention Warning,” [Online], available at https://www.highwayresource.co.uk/digital-services/intellicone-incursion-prevention-warning/.
- S. Wu, L. Hou, G. K. Zhang, and H. Chen, “Real-time mixed reality-based visual warning for construction workforce safety,” Automation in Construction, vol. 139, p. 104252, 2022.
- J. Ramos-Hurtado, F. Muñoz-La Rivera, J. Mora-Serrano, A. Deraemaeker, and I. Valero, “Proposal for the deployment of an augmented reality tool for construction safety inspection,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 500, 2022.
- X. Li, W. Yi, H.-L. Chi, X. Wang, and A. P. Chan, “A critical review of virtual and augmented reality (vr/ar) applications in construction safety,” Automation in Construction, vol. 86, pp. 150–162, 2018.
- K. Gilson, J. Mallela, P. M. Goodrum et al., “Leveraging augmented reality for highway construction,” Federal Highway Administration (US), Tech. Rep., 2020.
- A. Calvi, F. D’Amico, C. Ferrante, and L. B. Ciampoli, “Effectiveness of augmented reality warnings on driving behaviour whilst approaching pedestrian crossings: A driving simulator study,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 147, p. 105760, 2020.
- A. Matviienko, F. Müller, D. Schön, R. Fayard, S. Abaspur, Y. Li, and M. Mühlhäuser, “E-scootar: Exploring unimodal warnings for e-scooter riders in augmented reality,” in CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, 2022, pp. 1–7.
- T. Von Sawitzky, P. Wintersberger, A. Löcken, A.-K. Frison, and A. Riener, “Augmentation concepts with huds for cyclists to improve road safety in shared spaces,” in Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2020, pp. 1–9.
- K. Zhang and M. Hassan, “Crash severity analysis of nighttime and daytime highway work zone crashes,” PLoS one, vol. 14, no. 8, p. e0221128, 2019.
- I. Awolusi and E. D. Marks, “Active work zone safety: preventing accidents using intrusion sensing technologies,” Frontiers in built environment, vol. 5, p. 21, 2019.
- C. Li, Z. Qing, P. Edara, C. Sun, B. Balakrishnan, and Y. Shang, “Semi-automatic construction of virtual reality environment for highway work zone training using open-source tools,” in 2023 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). IEEE, 2023, pp. 489–492.
- S. Ergan, Z. Zou, S. D. Bernardes, F. Zuo, and K. Ozbay, “Developing an integrated platform to enable hardware-in-the-loop for synchronous vr, traffic simulation and sensor interactions,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 51, p. 101476, 2022.
- Z. Zou, S. D. Bernardes, A. Kurkcu, S. Ergan, K. Ozbay et al., “An integrated approach to capture construction workers’ response towards safety alarms using wearable sensors and virtual reality,” 2020.
- R. Horikawa, M. Ito, K. Komiya, T. Nakajima, and H. Yamana, “Comparing augmented reality-based display methods to present guiding information,” in 2022 IEEE 4th Global Conference on Life Sciences and Technologies (LifeTech). IEEE, 2022, pp. 22–25.
- F. Zaman, W. Drake, J. Intriligator, A. Gardony, M. Natick, and J. Rife, “Investigating a virtual reality based subterranean scenario examining augmented reality implications for military operators,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 65, no. 1. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2021, pp. 1129–1133.
- C. Merenda, C. Suga, J. Gabbard, and T. Misu, “Effects of vehicle simulation visual fidelity on assessing driver performance and behavior,” in 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE, 2019, pp. 1679–1686.
- S. Sabeti, O. Shoghli, M. Baharani, and H. Tabkhi, “Toward ai-enabled augmented reality to enhance the safety of highway work zones: Feasibility, requirements, and challenges,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 50, p. 101429, 2021.
- J. A. Gambatese, H. W. Lee, C. A. Nnaji et al., “Work zone intrusion alert technologies: Assessment and practical guidance,” Oregon. Dept. of Transportation. Research Section, Tech. Rep., 2017.
- J. Park and S. Sakhakarmi, “Embedded safety communication system for robust hazard perception of individuals in work zones,” 2019.
- D. Stout, J. Graham, B. Bryant-Fields, J. Migletz, J. Fish, and F. Hanscom, “Maintenance work zone safety devices development and evaluation,” Strategic Highway Research Program report SHRP-H-371, National Research Council, Washington DC, 1993.
- C. Eseonu, J. Gambatese, and C. Nnaji, “Reducing highway construction fatalities through improved adoption of safety technologies,” The Centre for Construction Research and Training (CPWR Small Study No. 17-4-PS), 2018.
- E. Marks and I. Vereen, “Active work zone safety using emerging technologies 2017,” University Transportation Center for Alabama, Tech. Rep., 2017.
- K. Chan, J. Louis, and A. Albert, “Incorporating worker awareness in the generation of hazard proximity warnings,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 3, p. 806, 2020.
- K. Kim, I. Jeong, and Y. K. Cho, “Signal processing and alert logic evaluation for iot–based work zone proximity safety system,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 149, no. 2, p. 05022018, 2023.
- H. Yun and J. H. Yang, “Multimodal warning design for take-over request in conditionally automated driving,” European transport research review, vol. 12, pp. 1–11, 2020.
- A. Matviienko, S. Ananthanarayan, S. S. Borojeni, Y. Feld, W. Heuten, and S. Boll, “Augmenting bicycles and helmets with multimodal warnings for children,” in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 2018, pp. 1–13.
- Y. Wang, B. Wu, S. Ma, D. Wang, T. Gan, H. Liu, and Z. Yang, “Effect of mapping characteristic on audiovisual warning: Evidence from a simulated driving study,” Applied ergonomics, vol. 99, p. 103638, 2022.
- M. J. Lazaro, S. Kim, J. Lee, J. Chun, and M.-H. Yun, “Interaction modalities for notification signals in augmented reality,” in Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, 2021, pp. 470–477.
- G. Wiegand, C. Mai, K. Holländer, and H. Hussmann, “Incarar: A design space towards 3d augmented reality applications in vehicles,” in Proceedings of the 11th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, 2019, pp. 1–13.
- P. Zhou, W. Zhang, T. Braud, P. Hui, and J. Kangasharju, “Arve: Augmented reality applications in vehicle to edge networks,” in Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on Mobile Edge Communications, 2018, pp. 25–30.
- M. I. Posner, “Timing the brain: Mental chronometry as a tool in neuroscience,” PLoS biology, vol. 3, no. 2, p. e51, 2005.
- J. Fernandez-Ruiz, W. Wong, I. T. Armstrong, and J. R. Flanagan, “Relation between reaction time and reach errors during visuomotor adaptation,” Behavioural brain research, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 8–14, 2011.
- S.-C. Li, U. Lindenberger, B. Hommel, G. Aschersleben, W. Prinz, and P. B. Baltes, “Transformations in the couplings among intellectual abilities and constituent cognitive processes across the life span,” Psychological science, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 155–163, 2004.
- M. T. Willoughby, C. B. Blair, L. J. Kuhn, and B. E. Magnus, “The benefits of adding a brief measure of simple reaction time to the assessment of executive function skills in early childhood,” Journal of experimental child psychology, vol. 170, pp. 30–44, 2018.
- M. Mueckstein, S. Heinzel, U. Granacher, M. Brahms, M. A. Rapp, and C. Stelzel, “Modality-specific effects of mental fatigue in multitasking,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 230, p. 103766, 2022.
- D. Maslovat, S. T. Klapp, C. J. Forgaard, R. Chua, and I. M. Franks, “The effect of response complexity on simple reaction time occurs even with a highly predictable imperative stimulus,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 704, pp. 62–66, 2019.
- N. Richer, N. Paquet, and Y. Lajoie, “Impact of age and obstacles on navigation precision and reaction time during blind navigation in dual-task conditions,” Gait & posture, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 835–840, 2014.
- K. Lu, J. M. Nicholas, S.-N. James, C. A. Lane, T. D. Parker, A. Keshavan, S. E. Keuss, S. M. Buchanan, H. Murray-Smith, D. M. Cash et al., “Increased variability in reaction time is associated with amyloid beta pathology at age 70,” Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, vol. 12, no. 1, p. e12076, 2020.
- D. L. Woods, J. M. Wyma, E. W. Yund, T. J. Herron, and B. Reed, “Age-related slowing of response selection and production in a visual choice reaction time task,” Frontiers in human neuroscience, vol. 9, p. 193, 2015.
- A. G. Greenwald and K. E. Rosenberg, “Sequential effects of distracting stimuli in a selective attention reaction time task,” in Attention and performance VII. Routledge, 2022, pp. 487–504.
- R. Langner, M. B. Steinborn, A. Chatterjee, W. Sturm, and K. Willmes, “Mental fatigue and temporal preparation in simple reaction-time performance,” Acta psychologica, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 64–72, 2010.
- E. A. Maylor, P. Rabbitt, G. James, and S. Kerr, “Effects of alcohol, practice, and task complexity on reaction time distributions,” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 119–139, 1992.
- C. Nnaji, A. A. Karakhan, J. Gambatese, and H. W. Lee, “Case study to evaluate work-zone safety technologies in highway construction,” Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, vol. 25, no. 3, p. 05020004, 2020.
- D. Thapa and S. Mishra, “Using worker’s naturalistic response to determine and analyze work zone crashes in the presence of work zone intrusion alert systems,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 156, p. 106125, 2021.
- X. Yang and N. Roofigari-Esfahan, “Vibrotactile alerting to prevent accidents in highway construction work zones: An exploratory study,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 12, p. 5651, 2023.
- E. Bottani and G. Vignali, “Augmented reality technology in the manufacturing industry: A review of the last decade,” IISE Transactions, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 284–310, 2019.
- A. Kelly, R. B. Shapiro, J. de Halleux, and T. Ball, “Arcadia: A rapid prototyping platform for real-time tangible interfaces,” in Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2018, pp. 1–8.
- L. Müller, K. Pfeuffer, J. Gugenheimer, B. Pfleging, S. Prange, and F. Alt, “Spatialproto: Exploring real-world motion captures for rapid prototyping of interactive mixed reality,” in Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2021, pp. 1–13.
- J. Hettig, S. Engelhardt, C. Hansen, and G. Mistelbauer, “Ar in vr: assessing surgical augmented reality visualizations in a steerable virtual reality environment,” International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1717–1725, 2018.
- R. Terrier, F. Argelaguet, J.-M. Normand, and M. Marchal, “Evaluation of ar inconsistencies on ar placement tasks: A vr simulation study,” in International Conference on Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality. Springer, 2018, pp. 190–210.
- J. G. Grandi, Z. Cao, M. Ogren, and R. Kopper, “Design and simulation of next-generation augmented reality user interfaces in virtual reality,” in 2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). IEEE, 2021, pp. 23–29.
- A. Burova, J. Mäkelä, J. Hakulinen, T. Keskinen, H. Heinonen, S. Siltanen, and M. Turunen, “Utilizing vr and gaze tracking to develop ar solutions for industrial maintenance,” in Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2020, pp. 1–13.
- S. Sabeti, N. Morris, and O. Shoghli, “Mixed-method usability investigation of arrows: augmented reality for roadway work zone safety,” International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 292–303, 2024, pMID: 38097505. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2023.2295660
- T. MUTCD, “Manual on uniform traffic control devices,” Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2006.
- “Tizen IoT Documentation,” https://docs.tizen.org/iot/api/5.0/tizen-iot-headed/group__CAPI__SYSTEM__FEEDBACK__MODULE.html, accessed: [March 22, 2024].
- R. Goenarjo, L. Bosquet, N. Berryman, V. Metier, A. Perrochon, S. A. Fraser, and O. Dupuy, “Cerebral oxygenation reserve: The relationship between physical activity level and the cognitive load during a stroop task in healthy young males,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 1406, 2020.
- N. A. Snyder and M. E. Cinelli, “Aperture crossing in virtual reality: Physical fatigue delays response time,” Journal of Motor Behavior, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 429–437, 2022.
- S. Sabeti, O. Shoghli, and H. Tabkhi, “Toward wi-fi-enabled real-time communication for proactive safety systems in highway work zones: A case study,” in Construction Research Congress 2022, 2022, pp. 1166–1173.
- A. Jain, R. Bansal, A. Kumar, and K. Singh, “A comparative study of visual and auditory reaction times on the basis of gender and physical activity levels of medical first year students,” International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 124, 2015.
- “Ml kit pose detection api,” https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/vision/pose-detection, accessed on: [Insert Date].
- H. S. Legg, C. M. Arnold, C. Trask, and J. L. Lanovaz, “Does functional performance and upper body strength predict upper extremity reaction and movement time in older women?” Human Movement Science, vol. 77, p. 102796, 2021.
- A. Godfrey, R. Conway, D. Meagher, and G. ÓLaighin, “Direct measurement of human movement by accelerometry,” Medical engineering & physics, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1364–1386, 2008.
- M. Z. Uddin, M. M. Hassan, A. Alsanad, and C. Savaglio, “A body sensor data fusion and deep recurrent neural network-based behavior recognition approach for robust healthcare,” Information Fusion, vol. 55, pp. 105–115, 2020.
- R. Begg and J. Kamruzzaman, “A machine learning approach for automated recognition of movement patterns using basic, kinetic and kinematic gait data,” Journal of biomechanics, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 401–408, 2005.
- H. Sato, N. Tanaka, M. Uchida, Y. Hirabayashi, M. Kanai, T. Ashida, I. Konishi, and A. Maki, “Wavelet analysis for detecting body-movement artifacts in optical topography signals,” Neuroimage, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 580–587, 2006.
- W. Jia and L. Shi, “The effect of auditory stimuli in audio-visual two-source integration,” in 2019 11th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics (IHMSC), vol. 1. IEEE, 2019, pp. 145–148.
- C. Geitner, F. Biondi, L. Skrypchuk, P. Jennings, and S. Birrell, “The comparison of auditory, tactile, and multimodal warnings for the effective communication of unexpected events during an automated driving scenario,” Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, vol. 65, pp. 23–33, 2019.
- S. Lee, J. Hong, G. Jeon, J. Jo, S. Boo, H. Kim, S. Jung, J. Park, I. Choi, and S. Kim, “Investigating effects of multimodal explanations using multiple in-vehicle displays for takeover request in conditionally automated driving,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 96, pp. 1–22, 2023.
- L. Doucé and C. Adams, “Sensory overload in a shopping environment: Not every sensory modality leads to too much stimulation,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 57, p. 102154, 2020.
- D. Katić, P. Spengler, S. Bodenstedt, G. Castrillon-Oberndorfer, R. Seeberger, J. Hoffmann, R. Dillmann, and S. Speidel, “A system for context-aware intraoperative augmented reality in dental implant surgery,” International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, vol. 10, pp. 101–108, 2015.
- R. Wu and H.-T. Chen, “The effect of visual and auditory modality mismatching between distraction and warning on pedestrian street crossing behavior.”
- U. Edet and D. D. Mann, “Evaluation of warning methods for remotely supervised autonomous agricultural machines,” Journal of agricultural safety and health, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2022.
- T. Williams, T. Esposito, S. Hu, D. Mahoney, and K. Paulson, “Effects of varying audio frequencies on reaction time and muscular activity,” 2014.
- E. A. Navarro and E. Navarro-Modesto, “A mathematical model and experimental procedure to analyze the cognitive effects of audio frequency magnetic fields,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 17, p. 1135511, 2023.
- O. Mosunmola Aroke, I. Sylvester Onuchukwu, B. Esmaeili, and A. M. Flintsch, “Countermeasures to reduce truck-mounted attenuator (tma) crashes: a state-of-the-art review,” Future transportation, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 425–452, 2022.
- C. Nnaji, A. Lee, and J. Gambatese, “Developing a decision-making framework to select safety technologies for highway construction,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 144, no. 4, p. 04018016, 2018.
- M. Hasan, D. Perez, Y. Shen, and H. Yang, “Distributed microscopic traffic simulation with human-in-the-loop enabled by virtual reality technologies,” Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 154, p. 102985, 2021.
- D. J. Harris, G. Buckingham, M. R. Wilson, J. Brookes, F. Mushtaq, M. Mon-Williams, and S. J. Vine, “Exploring sensorimotor performance and user experience within a virtual reality golf putting simulator,” Virtual Reality, vol. 25, pp. 647–654, 2021.
- B. Mills, P. Dykstra, S. Hansen, A. Miles, T. Rankin, L. Hopper, L. Brook, and D. Bartlett, “Virtual reality triage training can provide comparable simulation efficacy for paramedicine students compared to live simulation-based scenarios,” Prehospital Emergency Care, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 525–536, 2020.
- E. R. Hoeg, L. J. Gerry, L. Thomsen, N. C. Nilsson, and S. Serafin, “Binaural sound reduces reaction time in a virtual reality search task,” in 2017 IEEE 3rd VR workshop on sonic interactions for virtual environments (SIVE). IEEE, 2017, pp. 1–4.
- W. Fang, L. Ding, P. E. Love, H. Luo, H. Li, F. Pena-Mora, B. Zhong, and C. Zhou, “Computer vision applications in construction safety assurance,” Automation in Construction, vol. 110, p. 103013, 2020.
- M. Khan, R. Khalid, S. Anjum, S. V.-T. Tran, and C. Park, “Fall prevention from scaffolding using computer vision and iot-based monitoring,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 148, no. 7, p. 04022051, 2022.
- B. H. Guo, Y. Zou, Y. Fang, Y. M. Goh, and P. X. Zou, “Computer vision technologies for safety science and management in construction: A critical review and future research directions,” Safety science, vol. 135, p. 105130, 2021.
Sponsor
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.