Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 175 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 37 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 108 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 180 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Language Models Can Reduce Asymmetry in Information Markets (2403.14443v1)

Published 21 Mar 2024 in cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.LG, cs.MA, cs.SI, and cs.GT

Abstract: This work addresses the buyer's inspection paradox for information markets. The paradox is that buyers need to access information to determine its value, while sellers need to limit access to prevent theft. To study this, we introduce an open-source simulated digital marketplace where intelligent agents, powered by LLMs, buy and sell information on behalf of external participants. The central mechanism enabling this marketplace is the agents' dual capabilities: they not only have the capacity to assess the quality of privileged information but also come equipped with the ability to forget. This ability to induce amnesia allows vendors to grant temporary access to proprietary information, significantly reducing the risk of unauthorized retention while enabling agents to accurately gauge the information's relevance to specific queries or tasks. To perform well, agents must make rational decisions, strategically explore the marketplace through generated sub-queries, and synthesize answers from purchased information. Concretely, our experiments (a) uncover biases in LLMs leading to irrational behavior and evaluate techniques to mitigate these biases, (b) investigate how price affects demand in the context of informational goods, and (c) show that inspection and higher budgets both lead to higher quality outcomes.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (37)
  1. Evaluating correctness and faithfulness of instruction-following models for question answering, 2023.
  2. George A. Akerlof. The market for ”Lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3):488–500, August 1970.
  3. Franzen, grisham and other prominent authors sue openai, 2023. URL https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/20/books/authors-openai-lawsuit-chatgpt-copyright.html. Accessed: 2023-09-27.
  4. K. J. Arrow. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, pp.  219–236. Macmillan Education UK, London, 1972. ISBN 978-1-349-15486-9. doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-15486-9˙13. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15486-9_13.
  5. Training a helpful and harmless assistant with reinforcement learning from human feedback, 2022.
  6. Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokens. CoRR, abs/2112.04426, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.04426.
  7. The pile: An 800gb dataset of diverse text for language modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.00027, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00027.
  8. Precise zero-shot dense retrieval without relevance labels, 2022.
  9. John J. Horton. Large language models as simulated economic agents: What can we learn from homo silicus?, 2023.
  10. Evaluating open-domain question answering in the era of large language models, 2023.
  11. Utilizing python for agent-based modeling: The mesa framework. In Robert Thomson, Halil Bisgin, Christopher Dancy, Ayaz Hyder, and Muhammad Hussain (eds.), Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling, pp.  308–317, Cham, 2020. Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-030-61255-9.
  12. Baleen: Robust multi-hop reasoning at scale via condensed retrieval. In M. Ranzato, A. Beygelzimer, Y. Dauphin, P.S. Liang, and J. Wortman Vaughan (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pp.  27670–27682. Curran Associates, Inc., 2021. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2021/file/e8b1cbd05f6e6a358a81dee52493dd06-Paper.pdf.
  13. Llm-eval: Unified multi-dimensional automatic evaluation for open-domain conversations with large language models, 2023.
  14. Agentbench: Evaluating llms as agents, 2023a.
  15. G-eval: Nlg evaluation using gpt-4 with better human alignment, 2023b.
  16. Automated Markets and Trading Agents. In Leigh Tesfatsion and Kenneth L. Judd (eds.), Handbook of Computational Economics, volume 2 of Handbook of Computational Economics, chapter 28, pp.  1381–1431. Elsevier, 2006. URL https://ideas.repec.org/h/eee/hecchp/2-28.html.
  17. Assessing the quality of multiple-choice questions using gpt-4 and rule-based methods, 2023.
  18. Automated evaluation of written discourse coherence using GPT-4. In Proceedings of the 18th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2023), pp.  394–403, Toronto, Canada, July 2023. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2023.bea-1.32. URL https://aclanthology.org/2023.bea-1.32.
  19. Passage re-ranking with bert, 2020.
  20. OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report, 2023.
  21. Mapping the challenges of hci: An application and evaluation of chatgpt and gpt-4 for cost-efficient question answering, 2023.
  22. Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106(4):643–675, 1999. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.106.4.643.
  23. Peter L. T. Pirolli. Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information. Oxford University Press, Inc., USA, 1 edition, 2007. ISBN 0195173325.
  24. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. 2019. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:160025533.
  25. Okapi at trec-3. pp.  0–, 01 1994.
  26. Economics. Mcgraw-Hill Irwin, 2009.
  27. End-to-end training of multi-document reader and retriever for open-domain question answering. In M. Ranzato, A. Beygelzimer, Y. Dauphin, P.S. Liang, and J. Wortman Vaughan (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pp.  25968–25981. Curran Associates, Inc., 2021. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2021/file/da3fde159d754a2555eaa198d2d105b2-Paper.pdf.
  28. George J. Stigler. The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy, 69(3):213–225, 1961. ISSN 00223808, 1537534X. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1829263.
  29. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models, 2023.
  30. Evaluating open-qa evaluation, 2023.
  31. Chain of thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. CoRR, abs/2201.11903, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903.
  32. Michael J. Wooldridge. Introduction to Multiagent Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA, 2001. ISBN 047149691X.
  33. C-pack: Packaged resources to advance general chinese embedding, 2023.
  34. The socratic method for self-discovery in large language models, 2023. URL https://princeton-nlp.github.io/SocraticAI/. Accessed: 2023-08-08.
  35. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models, 2023.
  36. Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena, 2023.
  37. The ai economist: Improving equality and productivity with ai-driven tax policies, 2020.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

  • The paper introduces an open-source Information Bazaar where LLM agents counteract the buyer's inspection paradox.
  • It presents a dual capability model enabling agents to evaluate proprietary information while preventing unauthorized data retention.
  • Empirical insights reveal that rational choice and price sensitivity analyses enhance decision-making in digital information markets.

Analysis of the Buyer's Inspection Paradox in Information Markets through the Introduction of an Open-Source Marketplace Environment

Context and Challenge

The digital information marketplace, characterized by its highly asymmetric nature wherein sellers possess more knowledge about their offerings compared to buyers, presents a unique paradox. Sellers aim to protect their proprietary information from unauthorized access while buyers require sufficient access to assess the value of this information before making a purchase, a situation reminiscent of Akerlof's "Market for Lemons." Despite the existing strategies employed by information providers to monetize content, these tactics invariably restrict the free flow of information, stiflying discovery and access.

The Information Bazaar: Addressing the Inspection Paradox

The central innovation of this research resides in the design and deployment of an open-source simulated digital marketplace titled the Information Bazaar. Through this environment, the paper addresses the inspection paradox by employing LLM (LM)-powered agents acting on behalf of participants to negotiate the purchase and evaluation of proprietary information. The core novelty lies in the implementation of a dual capability model where agents possess both the ability to appraise information and induce a state of amnesia, thus preventing the unauthorized retention of unpurchased data. This framework allows for an intricate balance between protecting seller interests and fulfilling buyer needs for information access and evaluation.

Buyer and Vendor Agents

In this simulated marketplace, agents are bifurcated into buyer agents, who seek information to answer specific queries within a budget constraint, and vendor agents, who sell access to information segments owned by their principals. The environment stipulates that buyer agents perform a critical economic role by making decisions on which information pieces to purchase based on evaluations of relevance and price, all while operating under budgetary restrictions.

Mechanisms of the Bazaar

The marketplace operates on a structurally synchronous model where buyer agents publish tenders requesting information, to which vendor agents respond with quotes. These quotes, encompassing the document or passage along with a stated price, undergo scrutiny by buyer agents for potential purchase. Decisions hinge on a cost-benefit analysis driven by the relevance of cited information against its price.

Empirical Insights

The paper conducted within the Information Bazaar offers several empirical insights:

  • Rational Choice Evaluation: LLMs, particularly GPT-4, exhibit compelling rationality in decision-making when equipped with techniques like debate prompting. This instrument aids LLMs in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of purchasing decisions, highlighting the LLMs' potential as economic actors in digital marketplaces.
  • Price Sensitivity Analysis: Varying the price of information provokes discernible shifts in demand, underscoring the critical role of inspection in enabling more informed purchasing decisions. This model illustrates the nuanced interplay between price and information quality in influencing buying behavior.
  • Model Performance and Quality of Answers: Higher budget allocations generally correlate with improved answer quality, asserting that with adequate resources, buyer agents can more effectively navigate the information marketplace. Furthermore, the capacity for inspection markedly enhances answer precision, pointing to the utility of deeper information access in optimizing market transactions.

Future Directions

This work lays fertile ground for future exploration, particularly in investigating the dynamics of pricing strategies and their impact on market behavior. Tailoring LLMs through fine-tuning to personal or corporate preferences presents another avenue for enhancing model performance in such complex decision-making environments. Additionally, extending the operational framework to include latent information possessed by expert humans remains an untapped potential that could profoundly enrich the bazaar's ecosystem.

Concluding Remarks

In conclusion, the Information Bazaar ushers in a novel approach to mitigating the buyer's inspection paradox within digital information markets. Through the deployment of LLM-powered agents capable of appraising and temporarily accessing proprietary information, this environment facilitates a more balanced and productive interplay between informational access and copyright protection. The insights gleaned from this research underscore the significant implications for both the theoretical and practical aspects of information economics, digital marketplaces, and AI-driven decision-making processes.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown
Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 9 tweets and received 417 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper:

Start a free 7-day Pro trial