Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

First Measurement of the $ν_e$ and $ν_μ$ Interaction Cross Sections at the LHC with FASER's Emulsion Detector

Published 19 Mar 2024 in hep-ex, physics.ins-det, and hep-ph | (2403.12520v2)

Abstract: This paper presents the first results of the study of high-energy electron and muon neutrino charged-current interactions in the FASER$\nu$ emulsion/tungsten detector of the FASER experiment at the LHC. A subset of the FASER$\nu$ volume, which corresponds to a target mass of 128.6~kg, was exposed to neutrinos from the LHC $pp$ collisions with a centre-of-mass energy of 13.6~TeV and an integrated luminosity of 9.5 fb${-1}$. Applying stringent selections requiring electrons with reconstructed energy above 200~GeV, four electron neutrino interaction candidate events are observed with an expected background of $0.025{+0.015}_{-0.010}$, leading to a statistical significance of 5.2$\sigma$. This is the first direct observation of electron neutrino interactions at a particle collider. Eight muon neutrino interaction candidate events are also detected, with an expected background of $0.22{+0.09}_{-0.07}$, leading to a statistical significance of 5.7$\sigma$. The signal events include neutrinos with energies in the TeV range, the highest-energy electron and muon neutrinos ever detected from an artificial source. The energy-independent part of the interaction cross section per nucleon is measured over an energy range of 560--1740 GeV (520--1760 GeV) for $\nu_e$ ($\nu_{\mu}$) to be $(1.2_{-0.7}{+0.8}) \times 10{-38}~\mathrm{cm}{2}\,\mathrm{GeV}{-1}$ ($(0.5\pm0.2) \times 10{-38}~\mathrm{cm}{2}\,\mathrm{GeV}{-1}$), consistent with Standard Model predictions. These are the first measurements of neutrino interaction cross sections in those energy ranges.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (63)
  1. arXiv:1708.09389, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.035001.
  2. FASER Collaboration, Letter of Intent for FASER: ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC (2018). arXiv:1811.10243.
  3. FASER Collaboration, Technical Proposal for FASER: ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC (2018). arXiv:1812.09139.
  4. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08001.
  5. arXiv:1908.02310, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7631-5.
  6. FASER Collaboration, Technical Proposal: FASERnu (1 2020). arXiv:2001.03073.
  7. FASER Collaboration, The FASER Detector (2022). arXiv:2207.11427.
  8. arXiv:2105.06197, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L091101.
  9. arXiv:2303.14185, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.031801.
  10. arXiv:2002.08722.
  11. SND@LHC Collaboration, SND@LHC: The Scattering and Neutrino Detector at the LHC (10 2022). arXiv:2210.02784.
  12. arXiv:2305.09383, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.031802.
  13. arXiv:2109.10905, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.04.004.
  14. arXiv:2203.05090, doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ac865e.
  15. arXiv:2309.09581.
  16. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35318-6_9. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35318-6_9
  17. arXiv:2212.09379, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11747-w.
  18. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/07/P07017.
  19. arXiv:1704.06814, doi:10.1093/ptep/ptx131.
  20. arXiv:1906.03487, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2020)033.
  21. arXiv:2105.08270, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.113008.
  22. FASER Collaboration, Neutrino Rate Predictions for FASER (2024). arXiv:2402.13318.
  23. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034906. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034906
  24. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.014018. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.014018
  25. arXiv:2203.11601.
  26. arXiv:2309.08604, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.016010.
  27. arXiv:2309.12793.
  28. arXiv:0905.2517, doi:10.1016/j.nima.2009.12.009.
  29. arXiv:1510.05494.
  30. doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8.
  31. doi:10.2172/877507.
  32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.11.007.
  33. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/760/2/146. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/760/2/146
  34. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/160/1/012033. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/160/1/012033
  35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.01.162.
  36. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.012009. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.012009
  37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2016.06.125. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900216306957
  38. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa104. URL https://academic.oup.com/ptep/article-pdf/2020/8/083C01/34673722/ptaa104.pdf
  39. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511791277.013.
  40. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.41.2653.
  41. arXiv:0711.0728, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.052002.
  42. arXiv:0910.2201, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.072002.
  43. arXiv:0711.1183, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.12.027.
  44. arXiv:1302.4908, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.092003.
  45. arXiv:1411.6264, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.112003.
  46. arXiv:1407.4256, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.052010.
  47. arXiv:1111.0103, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.161802.
  48. arXiv:1404.4809, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.112003.
  49. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.19.2521.
  50. doi:10.1007/BF01445406.
  51. doi:10.1007/BF01474659.
  52. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.25.617.
  53. doi:10.1007/BF01596895.
  54. doi:10.2172/1421736.
  55. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(79)90303-4.
  56. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90598-0.
  57. doi:10.1007/s002880050078.
  58. arXiv:hep-ex/0509010, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.012008.
  59. arXiv:1011.2131, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.012005.
  60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(79)90536-7. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370269379905367
  61. arXiv:1711.08119, doi:10.1038/nature24459.
  62. arXiv:1711.11043, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.041101.
  63. arXiv:2011.03560, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.022001.
Citations (13)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 4 tweets with 47 likes about this paper.