Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 73 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 75 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 184 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 466 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

PAPERCLIP: Associating Astronomical Observations and Natural Language with Multi-Modal Models (2403.08851v1)

Published 13 Mar 2024 in astro-ph.IM, cs.CL, cs.CV, cs.IR, and cs.LG

Abstract: We present PAPERCLIP (Proposal Abstracts Provide an Effective Representation for Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training), a method which associates astronomical observations imaged by telescopes with natural language using a neural network model. The model is fine-tuned from a pre-trained Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) model using successful observing proposal abstracts and corresponding downstream observations, with the abstracts optionally summarized via guided generation using LLMs. Using observations from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) as an example, we show that the fine-tuned model embodies a meaningful joint representation between observations and natural language through tests targeting image retrieval (i.e., finding the most relevant observations using natural language queries) and description retrieval (i.e., querying for astrophysical object classes and use cases most relevant to a given observation). Our study demonstrates the potential for using generalist foundation models rather than task-specific models for interacting with astronomical data by leveraging text as an interface.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (47)
  1. Data compression and inference in cosmology with self-supervised machine learning. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 527(3):7459–7481, 2024.
  2. The DeepMind JAX Ecosystem, 2020. URL http://github.com/deepmind.
  3. A foundation model for atomistic materials chemistry. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.00096, 2023.
  4. Lukas Biewald. Experiment tracking with weights and biases, 2020. URL https://www.wandb.com/. Software available from wandb.com.
  5. OmniJet-α𝛼\alphaitalic_α: The first cross-task foundation model for particle physics. 3 2024.
  6. On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258, 2021.
  7. A new task: Deriving semantic class targets for the physical sciences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.14760, 2022.
  8. Radio galaxy zoo emu: towards a semantic radio galaxy morphology taxonomy. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 522(2):2584–2600, 2023.
  9. JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs, 2018. URL http://github.com/google/jax.
  10. Geoclip: Clip-inspired alignment between locations and images for effective worldwide geo-localization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16020, 2023.
  11. Llm.int8(): 8-bit matrix multiplication for transformers at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.07339, 2022.
  12. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020.
  13. astroquery: An Astronomical Web-querying Package in Python. Astrophysical Journal, 157:98, March 2019. doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aafc33.
  14. Array programming with NumPy. Nature, 585(7825):357–362, September 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2.
  15. Morpheus: A deep learning framework for the pixel-level analysis of astronomical image data. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 248(1):20, 2020.
  16. Estimating galactic distances from images using self-supervised representation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.04293, 2021a.
  17. Self-supervised representation learning for astronomical images. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 911(2):L33, 2021b.
  18. Flax: A neural network library and ecosystem for JAX, 2023. URL http://github.com/google/flax.
  19. Masked particle modeling on sets: Towards self-supervised high energy physics foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.13537, 2024.
  20. The dawes review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.01813, 2022.
  21. A brief review of contrastive learning applied to astrophysics. RAS Techniques and Instruments, 2(1):441–452, 2023.
  22. J. D. Hunter. Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment. Computing in Science & Engineering, 9(3):90–95, 2007. doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55.
  23. Mixtral of experts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04088, 2024.
  24. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun (eds.), 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7-9, 2015, Conference Track Proceedings, 2015. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980.
  25. Jupyter notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows. In F. Loizides and B. Schmidt (eds.), Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas, pp.  87 – 90. IOS Press, 2016.
  26. Astroclip: Cross-modal pre-training for astronomical foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03024, 2023.
  27. The phangs-hst survey: Physics at high angular resolution in nearby galaxies with the hubble space telescope. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 258(1):10, 2022.
  28. A text-guided protein design framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04611, 2023.
  29. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In 7th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA, May 6-9, 2019, 2019. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=Bkg6RiCqY7.
  30. Multiple physics pretraining for physical surrogate models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02994, 2023.
  31. Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748, 2018.
  32. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
  33. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pp. 8748–8763. PMLR, 2021.
  34. Cloome: contrastive learning unlocks bioimaging databases for queries with chemical structures. bioRxiv, 2023. doi: 10.1101/2022.11.17.516915. URL https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/01/2022.11.17.516915.
  35. The cosmic evolution survey (cosmos): overview. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 172(1):1, 2007.
  36. Radio galaxy zoo: towards building the first multipurpose foundation model for radio astronomy with self-supervised learning. RAS Techniques and Instruments, 3(1):19–32, 2024.
  37. Learning useful representations for radio astronomy" in the wild" with contrastive learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.08666, 2022.
  38. Self-supervised similarity search for large scientific datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.13151, 2021.
  39. Mining for strong gravitational lenses with self-supervised learning. The Astrophysical Journal, 932(2):107, 2022.
  40. Towards foundation models for scientific machine learning: Characterizing scaling and transfer behavior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00258, 2023.
  41. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  42. Finetuning foundation models for joint analysis optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.13536, 2024.
  43. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nature Methods, 17:261–272, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2.
  44. Rare galaxy classes identified in foundation model representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.02910, 2023.
  45. Deep transfer learning for star cluster classification: I. application to the phangs–hst survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 493(3):3178–3193, 2020.
  46. Efficient guided generation for llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09702, 2023.
  47. Huggingface’s transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03771, 2019.
Citations (5)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a novel multi-modal method by fine-tuning a pre-trained CLIP model with HST proposal abstracts to create a unified image-text representation for astronomical data.
  • It evaluates three training strategies—full network fine-tuning, freezing base layers with a projection head, and training from scratch—using 31,859 HST images and abstracts.
  • Results demonstrate significantly improved retrieval accuracy for queries like 'dwarf galaxy' and 'strong lensing,' highlighting the effective use of even noisy textual data.

Overview of PAPERCLIP: An Associative Multi-Modal Model for Astronomical Observations

The paper presents PAPERCLIP (Proposal Abstracts Provide an Effective Representation for Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training), a methodological advancement in the intersection of machine learning and astrophysics. This paper leverages a pre-trained Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) model to establish associations between telescope image observations and natural language descriptions, specifically utilizing Hubble Space Telescope (HST) data. The fine-tuning of the CLIP model is performed using text from successful observing proposals and corresponding HST observations. This research aims to create a joint representation space where image-text retrieval tasks can be efficiently executed, enhancing our ability to interact with astronomical data using natural language.

Methodological Approach

The paper's methodology focuses on the fine-tuning of a pre-trained CLIP model originally trained on a large corpus of image-text pairs from internet data. The fine-tuning is done using HST observation-abstract pairs. There are three approaches evaluated:

  1. Fine-Tuning the Entire Network: This includes adjusting all parameters of the pre-trained CLIP model.
  2. Freezing the Base Model and Training a Projection Head: Only a small projection head is trained while the base image and text encoders are kept frozen.
  3. Training from Scratch: A new model is trained from the ground up using the dataset.

For creating the dataset, the authors curated approximately 31,859 HST images with corresponding proposal abstracts. These abstracts were optionally summarized using a LLM to standardize the captions, which aimed to provide clearer associations between the observations and their descriptions.

Evaluation Metrics

The evaluation of the fine-tuned models was conducted through quantitative measures such as contrastive loss and retrieval accuracy. Retrieval accuracy was assessed by querying natural language against the set of HST observations and calculating the fraction of correct retrievals within the top-k% most similar results. Additionally, qualitative evaluations through image-to-text and text-to-image retrieval experiments demonstrated the practical utility of the fine-tuned models.

Results

The empirical results highlighted that the fine-tuned models significantly outperform the base CLIP model in both quantitative metrics and qualitative retrieval tasks. Notably, the model trained on raw proposal abstracts performed on par with the model trained on LLM-generated summarized abstracts, indicating that even noisy textual data could be effectively leveraged. For instance, the fine-tuned models demonstrated strong retrieval capabilities for specific queries such as "dwarf galaxy," "Jupiter," and "strong lensing," producing relevant HST images that corresponded accurately to these astronomical phenomena.

Implications and Future Directions

The development of PAPERCLIP stands as a significant integration of AI techniques into astrophysics, specifically in the context of multi-modal learning. Theoretically, this approach underscores the potential of foundation models pre-trained on large-scale, non-specific datasets to be adapted for highly specialized domains through fine-tuning. Practically, the implications of being able to interact with large astronomical datasets via natural language queries are immense. This could streamline the process of data exploration for researchers, enabling more intuitive data retrieval and potentially uncovering novel insights by identifying relevant patterns that traditional methods might miss.

Future developments might explore:

  • Extending to Other Telescopes: Adapting the model for data from other space observatories, thus improving cross-compatibility and generalization.
  • Improving Summarization Techniques: Enhancing the LLM summarization process to provide more accurate and detailed captions, which can further improve the model's performance.
  • Expanding Task Range: Utilizing the joint representation space for additional downstream tasks such as classification, segmentation, and anomaly detection in astronomical images.
  • Interactive Systems: Developing interactive AI systems that allow conversational interactions with astronomical datasets, thereby making advanced statistical and ML tools accessible to a broader range of scientists.

In conclusion, the PAPERCLIP methodology exemplifies the transformative potential of fine-tuned foundation models in scientific research, promoting significant strides towards intuitive and efficient data interaction in astrophysics. This work opens avenues for further exploration and refinement in the development of AI tools tailored for scientific inquiry and data analysis.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 4 posts and received 60 likes.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube