Modeling Methane Intensity of Oil and Gas Upstream Activities by Production Profile
Abstract: We propose a methodology for modelling methane intensities of Oil and Gas upstream activities for different production profiles with diverse combinations of region of operation and production volumes associated. This methodology leverages different data sources, including satellite measurements and public estimates of methane emissions but also country-level oil and gas production data and company reporting. The obtained methane intensity models are compared to the reference companies' own reporting in order to better understand methane emissions for different types of companies. The results show that regions of operation within the different production profiles have a significant impact on the value of modelled methane intensities, especially for operators located in a single or few countries, such as national and medium-sized international operators. This paper also shows that methane intensities reported by the companies tend to be on average 16.1 times smaller than that obtained using the methodology presented here, and cannot account for total methane emissions that are estimated for upstream operations in the different regions observed.
- United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative, “Guidelines for climate target setting for banks.” https://www.unepfi.org/industries/banking/guidelines-for-climate-target-setting-for-banks/. Accessed: 2023-06-30.
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, “Sixth assessment report.” https://www.ipcc.ch/assessment-report/ar6/. Accessed: 2023-06-30.
- International Energy Agency, “Guidelines for methane abatement.” https://www.iea.org/energy-system/fossil-fuels/methane-abatement. Accessed: 2023-06-30.
- S. N. Riddick and D. L. Mauzerall, “Likely substantial underestimation of reported methane emissions from united kingdom upstream oil and gas activities,” Energy & Environmental Science, Jan. 2022.
- J. Yu, B. Hmiel, D. R. Lyon, J. Warren, D. H. Cusworth, R. M. Duren, Y. Chen, E. C. Murphy, and A. R. Brandt, “Methane emissions from natural gas gathering pipelines in the permian basin,” Environmental Science & Technology Letters, Nov. 2022.
- L. Shen, D. Zavala-Araiza, R. Gautam, M. Omara, T. Scarpelli, J. Sheng, M. P. Sulprizio, J. Zhuang, Y. Zhang, Z. Qu, X. Lu, S. P. Hamburg, and D. J. Jacob, “Unravelling a large methane emission discrepancy in mexico using satellite observations,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 260, p. 112461, July 2021.
- R. A. Alvarez, D. Zavala-Araiza, D. R. Lyon, D. T. Allen, Z. R. Barkley, A. R. Brandt, K. J. Davis, S. C. Herndon, D. J. Jacob, A. Karion, E. A. Kort, B. K. Lamb, T. Lauvaux, J. D. Maasakkers, A. J. Marchese, M. Omara, S. W. Pacala, J. Peischl, A. L. Robinson, P. B. Shepson, C. Sweeney, A. Townsend-Small, S. C. Wofsy, and S. P. Hamburg, “Assessment of methane emissions from the u.s. oil and gas supply chain,” Science, June 2018.
- L. Shen, R. Gautam, M. Omara, D. Zavala-Araiza, J. D. Maasakkers, T. R. Scarpelli, A. Lorente, D. Lyon, J. Sheng, D. J. Varon, H. Nesser, Z. Qu, X. Lu, M. P. Sulprizio, S. P. Hamburg, and D. J. Jacob, “Satellite quantification of oil and natural gas methane emissions in the us and canada including contributions from individual basins,” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Sept. 2022.
- Z. Chen, D. J. Jacob, R. Gautam, M. Omara, R. N. Stavins, R. C. Stowe, H. Nesser, M. P. Sulprizio, A. Lorente, D. J. Varon, X. Lu, L. Shen, Z. Qu, D. C. Pendergrass, and S. Hancock, “Satellite quantification of methane emissions and oil–gas methane intensities from individual countries in the middle east and north africa: implications for climate action,” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, May 2023.
- L. Shen, D. J. Jacob, R. Gautam, M. Omara, T. R. Scarpelli, A. Lorente, D. Zavala-Araiza, X. Lu, Z. Chen, and J. Lin, “National quantifications of methane emissions from fuel exploitation using high resolution inversions of satellite observations,” Nature Communications, Aug. 2023.
- S. Peng, C. Giron, G. Liu, A. d'Aspremont, A. Benoit, T. Lauvaux, X. Lin, H. D. Rodrigues, M. Saunois, and P. Ciais, “High resolution assessment of coal mining methane emissions by satellite in shanxi, china,” iScience, June 2022.
- Y. Zhang, R. Gautam, S. Pandey, M. Omara, J. D. Maasakkers, P. Sadavarte, D. Lyon, H. Nesser, M. P. Sulprizio, D. J. Varon, R. Zhang, S. Houweling, D. Zavala-Araiza, R. A. Alvarez, A. Lorente, S. P. Hamburg, I. Aben, and D. J. Jacob, “Quantifying methane emissions from the largest oil-producing basin in the united states from space,” Science Advances, vol. 6, Apr. 2020.
- IEA (2023), “Global Methane Tracker 2023.” https://www.iea.org/reports/global-methane-tracker-2023. License: CC BY 4.0, Accessed: 2023-06-30.
- US Energy Information Administration, “International - Petroleum and other liquids.” https://www.eia.gov/international/data/world/petroleum-and-other-liquids/annual-petroleum-and-other-liquids-production. Accessed: 2023-06-30.
- US Energy Information Administration, “International - Natural gas.” https://www.eia.gov/international/data/world/natural-gas/dry-natural-gas-production. Accessed: 2023-06-30.
- Joint Organisations Data Initiative (JODI), “The JODI Gas World Database.” https://www.jodidata.org/gas/. Accessed: 2023-06-30.
- T. Lauvaux, C. Giron, M. Mazzolini, A. d’Aspremont, R. Duren, D. Cusworth, D. Shindell, and P. Ciais, “Global assessment of oil and gas methane ultra-emitters,” Science, vol. 375, no. 6580, pp. 557–561, 2022.
- S. Mufson, “Oil and gas companies underreported methane leaks, new study shows,” The Washington Post, June 2022.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.
