Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 70 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 42 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 34 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 111 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 202 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 452 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 34 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

MTC$[M_3, G]$: 3d Topological Order Labeled by Seifert Manifolds (2403.03973v1)

Published 6 Mar 2024 in hep-th, cond-mat.str-el, math-ph, math.GT, math.MP, and math.QA

Abstract: We propose a correspondence between topological order in 2+1d and Seifert three-manifolds together with a choice of ADE gauge group $G$. Topological order in 2+1d is known to be characterized in terms of modular tensor categories (MTCs), and we thus propose a relation between MTCs and Seifert three-manifolds. The correspondence defines for every Seifert manifold and choice of $G$ a fusion category, which we conjecture to be modular whenever the Seifert manifold has trivial first homology group with coefficients in the center of $G$. The construction determines the spins of anyons and their S-matrix, and provides a constructive way to determine the R- and F-symbols from simple building blocks. We explore the possibility that this correspondence provides an alternative classification of MTCs, which is put to the test by realizing all MTCs (unitary or non-unitary) with rank $r\leq 5$ in terms of Seifert manifolds and a choice of Lie group $G$.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg, “Classical and Quantum Conformal Field Theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 123 (1989) 177.
  2. A. Kitaev, “Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond,” Annals of Physics 321 no. 1, (Jan., 2006) 2–111.
  3. X.-G. Wen, “A theory of 2+1D bosonic topological orders,” National Science Review 3 no. 1, (Mar., 2016) 68–106, arxiv:1506.05768.
  4. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1090/surv/205.
  5. S. H. Simon, Topological Quantum. Oxford University Press, 9, 2023.
  6. M. Mignard and P. Schauenburg, “Modular categories are not determined by their modular data,” Letters in Mathematical Physics 111 no. 3, (2021) 60.
  7. Although the first such ambiguity occurs at a relatively high rank, 49.
  8. S.-H. Ng, E. C. Rowell, and X.-G. Wen, “Classification of modular data up to rank 11,” 8, 2023. arXiv:2308.09670 [math.QA].
  9. V. Ostrik, “Fusion categories of rank 2,” 2002.
  10. V. Ostrik, “Pre-modular categories of rank 3,” 2005.
  11. E. Rowell, R. Stong, and Z. Wang, “On classification of modular tensor categories,” Nov., 2009. http://arxiv.org/abs/0712.1377.
  12. P. Bruillard, S.-H. Ng, E. C. Rowell, and Z. Wang, “On classification of modular categories by rank,” arxiv:1507.05139 [math]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.05139.
  13. S.-H. Ng, E. C. Rowell, Z. Wang, and X.-G. Wen, “Reconstruction of modular data from $SL_2(\mathbb{}Z{})$ representations,” arxiv:2203.14829 [cond-mat, physics:math-ph]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.14829.
  14. T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto, and S. Gukov, “Gauge Theories Labelled by Three-Manifolds,” arXiv:1108.4389 [hep-th] (Aug., 2011) 1–58, arxiv:1108.4389 [hep-th].
  15. G. Y. Cho, D. Gang, and H.-C. Kim, “M-theoretic Genesis of Topological Phases,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2020 no. 11, (Nov., 2020) 115, arxiv:2007.01532.
  16. S. X. Cui, Y. Qiu, and Z. Wang, “From Three Dimensional Manifolds to Modular Tensor Categories,” Commun. Math. Phys. 397 no. 3, (2023) 1191–1235, arXiv:2101.01674 [math.QA].
  17. S. X. Cui, P. Gustafson, Y. Qiu, and Q. Zhang, “From torus bundles to particle–hole equivariantization,” Letters in Mathematical Physics 112 no. 1, (Feb., 2022) 1–19.
  18. P. Orlik, Seifert Manifolds. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1972.
  19. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1978. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0061699.
  20. F. Bonetti, S. Schafer-Nameki, and J. Wu, “To appear,” 2024.
  21. H. Nishi, “Su(n)-chern–simons invariants of seifert fibered 3-manifolds,” International Journal of Mathematics 09 (1998) 295–330.
  22. M. Mignard and P. Schauenburg, “Modular categories are not determined by their modular data,” pp. 1–11. 2021. 1708.02796. http://arxiv.org/abs/1708.02796.
  23. V. Chari and A. N. Pressley, A Guide to Quantum Groups. Cambridge University Press, July, 1995.
  24. S. F. Sawin, “Quantum Groups at Roots of Unity and Modularity,” arXiv.org (Aug., 2003) 1–30.
  25. E. C. Rowell, “From Quantum Groups to Unitary Modular Tensor Categories,” Mar., 2006. http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0503226.
  26. A. Schopieray, “Lie Theory for Fusion Categories: A Research Primer,” Oct., 2018. http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.09055.
  27. Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997.
  28. Princeton University Press, July, 1994.
  29. A. Bruguieres, “Catégories prémodulaires, modularisations et invariants des variétés de dimension 3,” Mathematische Annalen 316 no. 2, (2000) 215–236.
  30. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 1 like.