Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Information Flow Routes: Automatically Interpreting Language Models at Scale

Published 27 Feb 2024 in cs.CL and cs.AI | (2403.00824v2)

Abstract: Information flows by routes inside the network via mechanisms implemented in the model. These routes can be represented as graphs where nodes correspond to token representations and edges to operations inside the network. We automatically build these graphs in a top-down manner, for each prediction leaving only the most important nodes and edges. In contrast to the existing workflows relying on activation patching, we do this through attribution: this allows us to efficiently uncover existing circuits with just a single forward pass. Additionally, the applicability of our method is far beyond patching: we do not need a human to carefully design prediction templates, and we can extract information flow routes for any prediction (not just the ones among the allowed templates). As a result, we can talk about model behavior in general, for specific types of predictions, or different domains. We experiment with Llama 2 and show that the role of some attention heads is overall important, e.g. previous token heads and subword merging heads. Next, we find similarities in Llama 2 behavior when handling tokens of the same part of speech. Finally, we show that some model components can be specialized on domains such as coding or multilingual texts.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (37)
  1. The elephant in the interpretability room: Why use attention as explanation when we have saliency methods? In Alishahi, A., Belinkov, Y., Chrupała, G., Hupkes, D., Pinter, Y., and Sajjad, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the Third BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP, pp.  149–155, Online, November 2020. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.blackboxnlp-1.14. URL https://aclanthology.org/2020.blackboxnlp-1.14.
  2. Identifying and controlling important neurons in neural machine translation. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=H1z-PsR5KX.
  3. Language models are few-shot learners. In Larochelle, H., Ranzato, M., Hadsell, R., Balcan, M. F., and Lin, H. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pp.  1877–1901. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/file/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Paper.pdf.
  4. Cancedda, N. Spectral filters, dark signals, and attention sinks, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.09221.
  5. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways, 2022.
  6. Towards automated circuit discovery for mechanistic interpretability. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023.
  7. Adaptively sparse transformers. In Inui, K., Jiang, J., Ng, V., and Wan, X. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp.  2174–2184, Hong Kong, China, November 2019. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/D19-1223. URL https://aclanthology.org/D19-1223.
  8. Knowledge neurons in pretrained transformers. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp.  8493–8502, Dublin, Ireland, May 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.581. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.acl-long.581.
  9. Detecting and mitigating hallucinations in machine translation: Model internal workings alone do well, sentence similarity Even better. In Rogers, A., Boyd-Graber, J., and Okazaki, N. (eds.), Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp.  36–50, Toronto, Canada, July 2023a. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.3. URL https://aclanthology.org/2023.acl-long.3.
  10. Halomi: A manually annotated benchmark for multilingual hallucination and omission detection in machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Singapore, December 2023b. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.11746.pdf.
  11. A mathematical framework for transformer circuits. Transformer Circuits Thread, 2021. URL https://transformer-circuits.pub/2021/framework/index.html.
  12. Measuring the mixing of contextual information in the transformer. In Goldberg, Y., Kozareva, Z., and Zhang, Y. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp.  8698–8714, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, December 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.595. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-main.595.
  13. Transformer feed-forward layers are key-value memories. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp.  5484–5495, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, November 2021. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.446. URL https://aclanthology.org/2021.emnlp-main.446.
  14. The Flores-101 evaluation benchmark for low-resource and multilingual machine translation. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 10:522–538, 2022. doi: 10.1162/tacl˙a˙00474. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.tacl-1.30.
  15. Hallucinations in large multilingual translation models, 2023.
  16. How does gpt-2 compute greater-than?: Interpreting mathematical abilities in a pre-trained language model, 2023.
  17. A circuit for python docstrings in a 4-layer attention-only transformer, 2023. URL https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/u6KXXmKFbXfWzoAXn/a-circuit-for-python-docstrings-in-a-4-layer-attention-only.
  18. In-context learning creates task vectors, 2023.
  19. Attention is not only a weight: Analyzing transformers with vector norms. In Webber, B., Cohn, T., He, Y., and Liu, Y. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp.  7057–7075, Online, November 2020. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.574. URL https://aclanthology.org/2020.emnlp-main.574.
  20. Locating and editing factual associations in GPT. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2022.
  21. The singular value decompositions of transformer weight matrices are highly interpretable, 2022. URL https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mkbGjzxD8d8XqKHzA/the-singular-value-decompositions-of-transformer-weight.
  22. Molina, R. Traveling words: A geometric interpretation of transformers, 2023.
  23. No language left behind: Scaling human-centered machine translation, 2022.
  24. A universal part-of-speech tagset. In Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Declerck, T., Doğan, M. U., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Moreno, A., Odijk, J., and Piperidis, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12), pp.  2089–2096, Istanbul, Turkey, May 2012. European Language Resources Association (ELRA). URL http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2012/pdf/274_Paper.pdf.
  25. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 21(1), jan 2020. ISSN 1532-4435.
  26. Understanding arithmetic reasoning in language models using causal mediation analysis, 2023.
  27. Attribution patching outperforms automated circuit discovery, 2023.
  28. Function vectors in large language models, 2023.
  29. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models, 2023a.
  30. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models, 2023b.
  31. Visualizing data using t-sne. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9(86):2579–2605, 2008. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v9/vandermaaten08a.html.
  32. Attention is all you need. In Guyon, I., Luxburg, U. V., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., and Garnett, R. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf.
  33. Investigating gender bias in language models using causal mediation analysis. In Larochelle, H., Ranzato, M., Hadsell, R., Balcan, M., and Lin, H. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pp.  12388–12401. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/file/92650b2e92217715fe312e6fa7b90d82-Paper.pdf.
  34. Analyzing multi-head self-attention: Specialized heads do the heavy lifting, the rest can be pruned. In Korhonen, A., Traum, D., and Màrquez, L. (eds.), Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.  5797–5808, Florence, Italy, July 2019. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/P19-1580. URL https://aclanthology.org/P19-1580.
  35. Neurons in large language models: Dead, n-gram, positional, 2023.
  36. Interpretability in the wild: a circuit for indirect object identification in GPT-2 small. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=NpsVSN6o4ul.
  37. Opt: Open pre-trained transformer language models, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.01068.
Citations (20)

Summary

  • The paper introduces an efficient attribution method that reduces computational time by 100x to trace key information routes in Transformer models.
  • It employs a graph-based subgraph extraction approach to identify influential model components driving specific predictions.
  • Empirical findings reveal pivotal roles of specific attention heads, which improves model debugging and enhances interpretability across varied domains.

Interpreting LLMs Through Information Flow

Overview

In the paper titled "Information Flow Routes: Automatically Interpreting LLMs at Scale," authors Javier Ferrando and Elena Voita offer a novel method for understanding how information flows inside LLMs, particularly those built on the Transformer architecture. Their approach creates visualizable "information flow routes" that help trace which parts of a model are most relevant for making specific predictions. This approach aims to provide a clearer interpretation of the model's internal mechanisms, moving away from traditional activation patching techniques, towards a more efficient and automatic method using attribution.

Understanding Information Flow in Transformers

Transformers process input through layers of computations, where each layer includes operations such as attention and feed-forward mechanisms. Traditionally, interpreting these operations requires a detailed dissection of which nodes (token representations) and edges (operations) in the network graph are most active during prediction. The authors of this paper introduce a methodology that tracks the flow of information through these networks more systematically.

  • Graph Representation: The model's operations are represented as a graph where nodes are token embeddings and edges reflect the operations like attention links or feed-forward actions.
  • Subgraph Extraction: For every output prediction, the algorithm identifies a subgraph of this larger graph, focusing on nodes and edges that significantly influence the final outcome, known as "important subgraphs."

A Novel Approach to Extract Important Subgraphs

Unlike traditional methods that involve intensive computation to understand model behavior (often requiring multiple forward passes through the model), this paper proposes using an attribution method to simplify the process.

  • Efficient Attribution Over Activation Patching: The proposed approach takes roughly 100 times less computational time than older methods. It works by tracking back from an output layer to determine which parts of the network contributed most significantly to the decision.
  • Versatility and General Applicability: This tool is not limited by preset conditions and can be applied to a broader range of predictions, spanning various domains and language tasks.

Empirical Insights and Implications

The application on a version of the Llama model yields some insightful observations:

  • Relevance of Specific Attention Heads: Certain attention heads, like those tracking previous tokens or merging subwords, consistently play pivotal roles across different contexts and tasks.
  • Domain-Specific Components: When testing across various domains (code, multilingual texts), some model components are frequently more active, suggesting specialization towards particular types of data or tasks.

Looking Forward

The ability to map out and understand these information flow routes has important implications for both theoretical and applied AI research:

  • Model Debugging and Improvement: By pinpointing which areas of a model are most active for particular tasks, developers can better understand unexpected model behavior and improve model architectures.
  • Enhanced Interpretability: This method provides a more granular look at how decisions are made within LLMs, which is crucial for applications requiring transparency and accountability.

Conclusions

The development of information flow routes offers a promising direction towards demystifying the often opaque internal workings of large-scale LLMs. This approach not only enhances our understanding of these complex models but also opens the door to more targeted and efficient model optimization and debugging strategies.

By providing a clear, efficient, and scalable method to visualize and interpret the roles of various components in LLMs, this research takes a significant step forward in the field of machine learning interpretability. Future research may expand these techniques to other model architectures or integrate this understanding into the development of next-generation AI systems.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 6 tweets with 297 likes about this paper.