Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 173 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 77 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 187 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 440 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Self-testing of genuine multipartite non-local and non-maximally entangled states (2403.00010v3)

Published 26 Feb 2024 in quant-ph

Abstract: Self-testing enables the characterization of quantum systems with minimal assumptions on their internal working as such it represents the strongest form of certification for quantum systems. In the existing self-testing literature, self-testing states that are not maximally entangled, but exhibit genuine multipartite nonlocality, have remained an open problem. This is particularly important because, for many-body systems, genuine multipartite nonlocality has been recognized as the strongest form of multipartite quantum correlation. In this work, we present a Cabello-like paradox for scenarios involving an arbitrary number of parties. This paradox is a tool for detecting genuine multipartite nonlocality, allowing for the specific identification and self-testing of states that defy the paradox's limits the most, which turn out to be non-maximally multipartite entangled states. While recent results [\textit{\v{S}upi\'c et al., Nature Physics, 2023}] suggest network self-testing as a means to self-test all quantum states, here we operate within the standard self-testing framework to self-test genuine multipartite non-local and non-maximally entangled states.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (13)
  1. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information (Cambridge university press, 2010).
  2. I. Bengtsson and K. Życzkowski, Geometry of quantum states: an introduction to quantum entanglement (Cambridge university press, 2017).
  3. R. O’Donnell and J. Wright, in Proceedings of the forty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing (2016) pp. 899–912.
  4. D. Mayers and A. Yao, Quantum Info. Comput. 4, 273–286 (2004).
  5. C. Bamps and S. Pironio, Physical Review A 91, 052111 (2015).
  6. J. Kaniewski, Physical Review A 95, 062323 (2017).
  7. T. H. Yang and M. Navascués, Physical Review A 87, 050102 (2013).
  8. K. Bharti, Towards quantum advantage and certification with noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, Ph.D. thesis, National University of Singapore (Singapore) (2021).
  9. J. Kaniewski, Physical review letters 117, 070402 (2016).
  10. G. Svetlichny, Physical Review D 35, 3066 (1987).
  11. V. Scarani, Bell nonlocality (Oxford University Press, 2019).
  12. S. Popescu and D. Rohrlich, Foundations of Physics 24, 379 (1994).
  13. L. Masanes, Physical review letters 97, 050503 (2006).
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 1 like.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: