Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 95 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 391 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 159 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

An approximation of the Collatz map and a lower bound for the average total stopping time (2402.03276v3)

Published 5 Feb 2024 in math.DS, math.CO, math.NT, and math.PR

Abstract: Define the map $\mathsf{T}$ on the positive integers by $\mathsf{T}(m)=\frac{m}{2}$ if $m$ is even and by $\mathsf{T}(m)=\frac{3m+1}{2}$ if $m$ is odd. Results of Terras and Everett imply that, given any $\epsilon>0$, almost all $m\in\mathbb{Z}+$ (in the sense of natural density) fulfill $(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2})km{1-\epsilon}\leq \mathsf{T}k(m)\leq (\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2})km{1+\epsilon}$ simultaneously for all $0\leq k\leq \alpha\log m$ with $\alpha=(\log 2){-1}\approx 1.443$. We extend this result to $\alpha=2(\log\frac{4}{3}){-1}\approx 6.952$, which is the maximally possible value. Set $\mathsf{T}{\min}(m):=\min{n\in\mathbb{N}}\mathsf{T}n(m)$. As an immediate consequence, one has $\mathsf{T}{\min}(m)\leq\mathsf{T}{\left\lfloor2(\log\frac{4}{3}){-1}\log m\right\rfloor}(m)\leq m{\epsilon}$ for almost all $m\in\mathbb{Z}+$ for any given $\epsilon>0$. Previously, Korec has shown that $\mathsf{T}{\min}(m)\leq m\epsilon$ for almost all $m\in\mathbb{Z}+$ if $\epsilon>\frac{\log3}{\log4}$, and recently Tao proved that $\mathsf{T}{\min}(m)\leq f(m)$ for almost all $m\in\mathbb{Z}+$ (in the sense of logarithmic density) for all functions $f$ diverging to $\infty$. Denote by $\tau(m)$ the minimal $n\in\mathbb{N}$ for which $\mathsf{T}n(m)=1$ if there exists such an $n$ and set $\tau(m)=\infty$ otherwise. As another application, we show that $\liminf{x\rightarrow\infty}\frac{1}{x\log x}\sum_{m=1}{\lfloor x\rfloor}\tau(m)\geq 2(\log\frac{4}{3}){-1}$, partially answering a question of Crandall and Shanks. Under the assumption that the Collatz Conjecture is true in the strong sense that $\tau(m)$ is in $O(\log m)$, we show that $\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\frac{1}{x\log x}\sum_{m=1}{\lfloor x\rfloor}\tau(m)= 2(\log\frac{4}{3}){-1}$.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)