Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Silent Guardian: Protecting Text from Malicious Exploitation by Large Language Models (2312.09669v7)

Published 15 Dec 2023 in cs.CR

Abstract: The rapid development of LLMs has yielded impressive success in various downstream tasks. However, the vast potential and remarkable capabilities of LLMs also raise new security and privacy concerns if they are exploited for nefarious purposes due to their open-endedness. For example, LLMs may be used to plagiarize or imitate writing, thereby infringing the copyright of the original content, or to create indiscriminate fake information based on a certain source text. In some cases, LLMs can even analyze text from the Internet to infer personal privacy. Unfortunately, previous text protection research could not foresee the emergence of powerful LLMs, rendering it no longer effective in this new context. To bridge this gap, we introduce Silent Guardian (SG), a text protection mechanism against LLMs, which allows LLMs to refuse to generate response when receiving protected text, preventing the malicious use of text from the source. Specifically, we first propose the concept of Truncation Protection Examples (TPE). By carefully modifying the text to be protected, TPE can induce LLMs to first sample the end token, thus directly terminating the interaction. In addition, to efficiently construct TPE in the discrete space of text data, we propose a novel optimization algorithm called Super Tailored Protection (STP), which is not only highly efficient but also maintains the semantic consistency of the text during the optimization process. The comprehensive experimental evaluation demonstrates that SG can effectively protect the target text under various configurations and achieve almost 100% protection success rate in some cases. Notably, SG also exhibits relatively good transferability and robustness, making its application in practical scenarios possible. Our code is available at https://github.com/weiyezhimeng/Silent-Guardian.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (46)
  1. P. Liu, W. Yuan, J. Fu, Z. Jiang, H. Hayashi, and G. Neubig, “Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 1–35, 2023.
  2. S. I. Ross, F. Martinez, S. Houde, M. Muller, and J. D. Weisz, “The programmer’s assistant: Conversational interaction with a large language model for software development,” in Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 2023, pp. 491–514.
  3. Z. Xiao, X. Yuan, Q. V. Liao, R. Abdelghani, and P.-Y. Oudeyer, “Supporting qualitative analysis with large language models: Combining codebook with gpt-3 for deductive coding,” in Companion Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 2023, pp. 75–78.
  4. Y. Feng, J. Qiang, Y. Li, Y. Yuan, and Y. Zhu, “Sentence simplification via large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.11957, 2023.
  5. R. Staab, M. Vero, M. Balunović, and M. Vechev, “Beyond memorization: Violating privacy via inference with large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.07298, 2023.
  6. Lcamtuf, “Large language models and plagiarism,” https://lcamtuf.substack.com/p/large-language-models-and-plagiarism, 2023, accessed on 2023-11-22.
  7. C. Chen and K. Shu, “Combating misinformation in the age of llms: Opportunities and challenges,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.05656, 2023.
  8. J. T. Brassil, S. Low, and N. F. Maxemchuk, “Copyright protection for the electronic distribution of text documents,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 87, no. 7, pp. 1181–1196, 1999.
  9. B. Zhu, J. Wu, and M. S. Kankanhalli, “Render sequence encoding for document protection,” IEEE transactions on multimedia, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 16–24, 2006.
  10. U. Khadam, M. M. Iqbal, M. A. Azam, S. Khalid, S. Rho, and N. Chilamkurti, “Digital watermarking technique for text document protection using data mining analysis,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 64 955–64 965, 2019.
  11. U. Khadim, M. M. Iqbal, and M. A. Azam, “An intelligent three-level digital watermarking method for document protection,” Mehran University Research Journal Of Engineering & Technology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 323–334, 2021.
  12. H. Fang, W. Zhang, H. Zhou, H. Cui, and N. Yu, “Screen-shooting resilient watermarking,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1403–1418, 2018.
  13. N. Boucher, I. Shumailov, R. Anderson, and N. Papernot, “Bad characters: Imperceptible nlp attacks,” in 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP).   IEEE, 2022, pp. 1987–2004.
  14. I. Markwood, D. Shen, Y. Liu, and Z. Lu, “Mirage: Content masking attack against {{\{{Information-Based}}\}} online services,” in 26th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 17), 2017, pp. 833–847.
  15. National Security Agency, “Redacting with confidence: How to safely publish sanitized reports converted from word to pdf,” Architectures Appl. Division, Syst. Netw. Attack Center, Rep. I333–015R-2005, 2008.
  16. D. Sánchez and M. Batet, “Toward sensitive document release with privacy guarantees,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 59, pp. 23–34, 2017.
  17. B. Anandan and C. Clifton, “Significance of term relationships on anonymization,” in 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, vol. 3.   IEEE, 2011, pp. 253–256.
  18. F. Hassan, D. Sánchez, and J. Domingo-Ferrer, “Utility-preserving privacy protection of textual documents via word embeddings,” IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1058–1071, 2021.
  19. T. Shin, Y. Razeghi, R. L. Logan IV, E. Wallace, and S. Singh, “Autoprompt: Eliciting knowledge from language models with automatically generated prompts,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.15980, 2020.
  20. A. Zou, Z. Wang, J. Z. Kolter, and M. Fredrikson, “Universal and transferable adversarial attacks on aligned language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15043, 2023.
  21. E. Wallace, S. Feng, N. Kandpal, M. Gardner, and S. Singh, “Universal adversarial triggers for attacking and analyzing nlp,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.07125, 2019.
  22. C. Guo, A. Sablayrolles, H. Jégou, and D. Kiela, “Gradient-based adversarial attacks against text transformers,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.13733, 2021.
  23. Y. Wen, N. Jain, J. Kirchenbauer, M. Goldblum, J. Geiping, and T. Goldstein, “Hard prompts made easy: Gradient-based discrete optimization for prompt tuning and discovery,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03668, 2023.
  24. J. Li, S. Ji, T. Du, B. Li, and T. Wang, “Textbugger: Generating adversarial text against real-world applications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.05271, 2018.
  25. J. Ebrahimi, D. Lowd, and D. Dou, “On adversarial examples for character-level neural machine translation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.09030, 2018.
  26. Y. Zang, F. Qi, C. Yang, Z. Liu, M. Zhang, Q. Liu, and M. Sun, “Word-level textual adversarial attacking as combinatorial optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.12196, 2019.
  27. M. Alzantot, Y. Sharma, A. Elgohary, B.-J. Ho, M. Srivastava, and K.-W. Chang, “Generating natural language adversarial examples,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.07998, 2018.
  28. L. Li, R. Ma, Q. Guo, X. Xue, and X. Qiu, “Bert-attack: Adversarial attack against bert using bert,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.09984, 2020.
  29. S. Samanta and S. Mehta, “Towards crafting text adversarial samples,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.02812, 2017.
  30. M. Iyyer, J. Wieting, K. Gimpel, and L. Zettlemoyer, “Adversarial example generation with syntactically controlled paraphrase networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.06059, 2018.
  31. C. Szegedy, W. Zaremba, I. Sutskever, J. Bruna, D. Erhan, I. Goodfellow, and R. Fergus, “Intriguing properties of neural networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6199, 2013.
  32. J. Jia, A. Salem, M. Backes, Y. Zhang, and N. Z. Gong, “Memguard: Defending against black-box membership inference attacks via adversarial examples,” in Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security, 2019, pp. 259–274.
  33. R. Shetty, B. Schiele, and M. Fritz, “{{\{{A4NT}}\}}: Author attribute anonymity by adversarial training of neural machine translation,” in 27th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 18), 2018, pp. 1633–1650.
  34. X. Li, L. Chen, and D. Wu, “Turning attacks into protection: Social media privacy protection using adversarial attacks,” in Proceedings of the 2021 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM).   SIAM, 2021, pp. 208–216.
  35. A. Radford, J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clark et al., “Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,” in International conference on machine learning.   PMLR, 2021, pp. 8748–8763.
  36. R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P. Esser, and B. Ommer, “High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2022, pp. 10 684–10 695.
  37. T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell et al., “Language models are few-shot learners,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020.
  38. W.-L. Chiang, Z. Li, Z. Lin, Y. Sheng, Z. Wu, H. Zhang, L. Zheng, S. Zhuang, Y. Zhuang, J. E. Gonzalez et al., “Vicuna: An open-source chatbot impressing gpt-4 with 90%* chatgpt quality,” See https://vicuna. lmsys. org (accessed 14 April 2023), 2023.
  39. H. Touvron, T. Lavril, G. Izacard, X. Martinet, M.-A. Lachaux, T. Lacroix, B. Rozière, N. Goyal, E. Hambro, F. Azhar et al., “Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023.
  40. T. Dettmers, A. Pagnoni, A. Holtzman, and L. Zettlemoyer, “Qlora: Efficient finetuning of quantized llms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14314, 2023.
  41. V. I. Levenshtein et al., “Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals,” in Soviet physics doklady, vol. 10, no. 8.   Soviet Union, 1966, pp. 707–710.
  42. D. Cer, Y. Yang, S.-y. Kong, N. Hua, N. Limtiaco, R. S. John, N. Constant, M. Guajardo-Cespedes, S. Yuan, C. Tar et al., “Universal sentence encoder,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.11175, 2018.
  43. C. Wang, K. Cho, and J. Gu, “Neural machine translation with byte-level subwords,” in Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 34, no. 05, 2020, pp. 9154–9160.
  44. G. Deng, Y. Liu, Y. Li, K. Wang, Y. Zhang, Z. Li, H. Wang, T. Zhang, and Y. Liu, “Jailbreaker: Automated jailbreak across multiple large language model chatbots,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.08715, 2023.
  45. L. Ouyang, J. Wu, X. Jiang, D. Almeida, C. Wainwright, P. Mishkin, C. Zhang, S. Agarwal, K. Slama, A. Ray et al., “Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 27 730–27 744, 2022.
  46. “tiktoken.” [Online]. Available: https://github.com/openai/tiktoken
Citations (4)

Summary

  • The paper introduces Silent Guardian, a truncation protection mechanism that forces LLMs to prematurely end text generation.
  • The paper employs the Super Tailored Protection algorithm to optimize Truncation Protection Examples, achieving near-perfect protection across diverse LLM configurations.
  • The paper demonstrates the framework's scalability and real-world applicability in addressing privacy and copyright concerns in AI-generated content.

Analysis of Silent Guardian: A Text Protection Mechanism Against LLMs

The paper "Silent Guardian: Protecting Text from Malicious Exploitation by LLMs" investigates the emerging need for text protection mechanisms in the context of LLMs. LLMs have the potential to perform multifaceted tasks, including natural conversation and information generation. However, these capabilities could be leveraged for malicious purposes, raising concerns about privacy and copyright violations. This paper introduces a novel approach, Silent Guardian (SG), to protect sensitive text content from being exploited by LLMs.

Silent Guardian is predicated on a new concept termed Truncation Protection Examples (TPE), which inhibits LLMs' ability to process certain text inputs. By modifying the protected text, SG induces LLMs to sample an end token prematurely, effectively terminating further text generation. This approach notably diverges from conventional copyright and privacy protection methodologies that have become less effective with the evolution of LLMs.

A critical component of SG is the Super Tailored Protection (STP) algorithm. STP is designed to optimize the construction of TPEs in a computationally efficient manner while preserving the semantic consistency of the original content. The optimization framework incorporates gradation-based methods to construct a protective layer within text inputs, ensuring LLMs cannot generate responses when faced with such protected inputs.

Experimental evaluations of the SG reveal promising protective capabilities across several LLM configurations, achieving near-perfect protection success rates in various testing scenarios. This protection retains its robustness even when deployed across different LLM architectures, illustrating potential applicability in real-world scenarios.

Key insights from this paper highlight the scalability of SG in adapting to texts of varying lengths and styles, offering flexibility in practical applications. While earlier methods focused primarily on traceability and access control, SG bypasses these limitations by disabling the generative functions of LLMs when confronted with protected texts.

The paper underscores the importance of developing security-focused AI applications that preemptively address risks associated with advanced LLMs. The proposed Silent Guardian framework can be extended to other media and model types, suggesting broader implications for privacy and security in AI.

Looking to the future, further research might explore how SG principles could be integrated into adaptive security policies for LLM training. Additionally, the problem of ensuring these protections maintain resilience against evolving adversarial techniques remains pertinent, demanding continuous advancements in algorithmic strategies like the STP method.

The paper presents Silent Guardian as an innovative framework specifically designed to mitigate the risks posed by LLMs' generative capabilities. This research fosters a broader dialogue on AI's role in ensuring secure communication channels in increasingly digitized environments.

Whiteboard

Video Overview

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.