Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
95 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Premium
32 tokens/sec
GPT-5 Medium
18 tokens/sec
GPT-5 High Premium
20 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
97 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Premium
87 tokens/sec
GPT OSS 120B via Groq Premium
468 tokens/sec
Kimi K2 via Groq Premium
202 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Composite Survival Analysis: Learning with Auxiliary Aggregated Baselines and Survival Scores (2312.05854v1)

Published 10 Dec 2023 in cs.LG and stat.ML

Abstract: Survival Analysis (SA) constitutes the default method for time-to-event modeling due to its ability to estimate event probabilities of sparsely occurring events over time. In this work, we show how to improve the training and inference of SA models by decoupling their full expression into (1) an aggregated baseline hazard, which captures the overall behavior of a given population, and (2) independently distributed survival scores, which model idiosyncratic probabilistic dynamics of its given members, in a fully parametric setting. The proposed inference method is shown to dynamically handle right-censored observation horizons, and to achieve competitive performance when compared to other state-of-the-art methods in a variety of real-world datasets, including computationally inefficient Deep Learning-based SA methods and models that require MCMC for inference. Nevertheless, our method achieves robust results from the outset, while not being subjected to fine-tuning or hyperparameter optimization.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. A time-dependent discrimination index for survival data. Statistics in medicine, 24(24):3927–3944, 2005.
  2. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory, pages 144–152, 1992.
  3. Leo Breiman. Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1):5–32, 2001.
  4. David R Cox. Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2):187–202, 1972.
  5. Bradley Efron. The efficiency of cox’s likelihood function for censored data. Journal of the American statistical Association, 72(359):557–565, 1977.
  6. Gaussian processes for survival analysis. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 29, 2016.
  7. A predictive approach to bayesian nonparametric survival analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.10361, 2022.
  8. Random survival forests. The annals of applied statistics, 2(3):841–860, 2008.
  9. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American statistical association, 53(282):457–481, 1958.
  10. Deepsurv: personalized treatment recommender system using a cox proportional hazards deep neural network. BMC medical research methodology, 18(1):1–12, 2018.
  11. Time-to-event prediction with neural networks and cox regression. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.00825, 2019.
  12. Temporally-consistent survival analysis. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:10671–10683, 2022.
  13. Deep survival analysis: Nonparametrics and missingness. In Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference, pages 244–256. PMLR, 2018.
  14. Bayesian and classical inference for the generalized log-logistic distribution with applications to survival data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2021, 2021.
  15. David Oakes. The asymptotic information in censored survival data. Biometrika, 64(3):441–448, 1977.
  16. Fast training of support vector machines for survival analysis. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: European Conference, ECML PKDD 2015, Porto, Portugal, September 7-11, 2015, Proceedings, Part II 15, pages 243–259. Springer, 2015.
  17. An efficient training algorithm for kernel survival support vector machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.07054, 2016.
  18. Deep exponential families. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 762–771. PMLR, 2015.
  19. Deep survival analysis. In Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference, pages 101–114. PMLR, 2016.
  20. Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for some traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 21(1):128, 2010.
  21. Predicting clinical outcomes from large scale cancer genomic profiles with deep survival models. Scientific reports, 7(1):1–11, 2017.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)