Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 71 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 46 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 93 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 207 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 460 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Coupled Dark Sector Models and Cosmological Tensions (2312.01410v3)

Published 3 Dec 2023 in astro-ph.CO

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce two coupling models of early dark energy (EDE) and cold dark matter aimed at alleviating cosmological tensions. We utilize the EDE component in the coupling models to relieve the Hubble tension, while leveraging the interaction between dark matter and dark energy to alleviate the large-scale structure tension. The interaction is implemented in the form of pure momentum coupling and Yukawa coupling. We employed various cosmological datasets, including cosmic microwave background radiation, baryon acoustic oscillations, Type Ia supernovae, the local distance-ladder data (SH0ES), and the Dark Energy Survey Year-3 data, to analyze our models. We first exclude SH0ES data from the entire dataset to constrain the parameters of novel models. We observe that the constraints on $H_0$ from two coupling models are slightly higher than that from the $\Lambda$CDM model, but they exhibit a significant inconsistency with the SH0ES data, consistent with prior research findings in the EDE model. Subsequently, we incorporate SH0ES data to re-constrain the parameters of various models, our findings reveal that both coupling models yield best-fit values for $H_0$ approximately around $72.23$ km/s/Mpc, effectively mitigating the Hubble tension. Similar to the EDE model, the coupling models yield the $S_8$ values that still surpasses the result of the $\Lambda$CDM model. Nevertheless, the best-fit values for $S_8$ obtained with the two new models are 0.8192 and 0.8177, respectively, which are lower than the 0.8316 achieved by the EDE model. Consequently, although our coupling models fail to fully resolve the large-scale structure tension, they partially mitigate the adverse effect of the original EDE model.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. L. Verde, T. Treu, and A. G. Riess, Tensions between the early and late universe, Nature Astronomy 3, 891 (2019).
  2. E. Macaulay, I. K. Wehus, and H. K. Eriksen, Lower growth rate from recent redshift space distortion measurements than expected from planck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 161301 (2013).
  3. R.-Y. Guo, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Can the h0 tension be resolved in extensions to lcdm cosmology?, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (02), 054.
  4. X. Li and A. Shafieloo, A simple phenomenological emergent dark energy model can resolve the hubble tension, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 883, L3 (2019).
  5. T. L. Smith, V. Poulin, and M. A. Amin, Oscillating scalar fields and the hubble tension: A resolution with novel signatures, Phys. Rev. D 101, 063523 (2020).
  6. F. Niedermann and M. S. Sloth, New early dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 103, L041303 (2021).
  7. F. Niedermann and M. S. Sloth, Resolving the hubble tension with new early dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 102, 063527 (2020).
  8. J. Buch, P. Ralegankar, and V. Rentala, Late decaying 2-component dark matter scenario as an explanation of the ams-02 positron excess, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2017 (10), 028.
  9. S. J. Clark, K. Vattis, and S. M. Koushiappas, Cosmological constraints on late-universe decaying dark matter as a solution to the H0subscript𝐻0{H}_{0}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT tension, Phys. Rev. D 103, 043014 (2021).
  10. M. Kamionkowski, J. Pradler, and D. G. E. Walker, Dark energy from the string axiverse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 251302 (2014).
  11. D. J. Marsh, Axion cosmology, Physics Reports 643, 1 (2016), axion cosmology.
  12. A. Pourtsidou, C. Skordis, and E. J. Copeland, Models of dark matter coupled to dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 88, 083505 (2013).
  13. A. Pourtsidou and T. Tram, Reconciling cmb and structure growth measurements with dark energy interactions, Phys. Rev. D 94, 043518 (2016).
  14. G. Caldera-Cabral, R. Maartens, and B. M. Schaefer, The growth of structure in interacting dark energy models, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2009 (07), 027.
  15. K. Koyama, R. Maartens, and Y.-S. Song, Velocities as a probe of dark sector interactions, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2009 (10), 017.
  16. H. Yukawa, On the Interaction of Elementary Particles. I, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement 1, 1 (1955).
  17. G. R. Farrar and P. J. E. Peebles, Interacting dark matter and dark energy, The Astrophysical Journal 604, 1 (2004).
  18. C. Vafa, The string landscape and the swampland (2005) arXiv:0509212 [hep-th] .
  19. E. Palti, The swampland: Introduction and review, Fortschritte der Physik 67 (2019).
  20. P. G. Ferreira and M. Joyce, Cosmology with a primordial scaling field, Phys. Rev. D 58, 023503 (1998).
  21. D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues, and T. Tram, The cosmic linear anisotropy solving system (CLASS). part II: Approximation schemes, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2011 (07), 034.
  22. J. Lesgourgues, The cosmic linear anisotropy solving system (class) i: Overview (2011), arXiv:1104.2932 [astro-ph.IM] .
  23. T. Brinckmann and J. Lesgourgues, Montepython 3: boosted mcmc sampler and other features (2018), arXiv:1804.07261 [astro-ph.CO] .
  24. A. Lewis, Getdist: a python package for analysing monte carlo samples (2019), arXiv:1910.13970 [astro-ph.IM] .
  25. H. Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 (1974).
  26. M. Raveri and W. Hu, Concordance and discordance in cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 99, 043506 (2019).
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 2 posts and received 3 likes.