Rethinking Evaluation Metrics of Open-Vocabulary Segmentaion

Abstract: In this paper, we highlight a problem of evaluation metrics adopted in the open-vocabulary segmentation. That is, the evaluation process still heavily relies on closed-set metrics on zero-shot or cross-dataset pipelines without considering the similarity between predicted and ground truth categories. To tackle this issue, we first survey eleven similarity measurements between two categorical words using WordNet linguistics statistics, text embedding, and LLMs by comprehensive quantitative analysis and user study. Built upon those explored measurements, we designed novel evaluation metrics, namely Open mIoU, Open AP, and Open PQ, tailored for three open-vocabulary segmentation tasks. We benchmarked the proposed evaluation metrics on 12 open-vocabulary methods of three segmentation tasks. Even though the relative subjectivity of similarity distance, we demonstrate that our metrics can still well evaluate the open ability of the existing open-vocabulary segmentation methods. We hope that our work can bring with the community new thinking about how to evaluate the open ability of models. The evaluation code is released in github.