Entropy-Based Strategies for Multi-Bracket Pools (2308.14339v3)
Abstract: Much work in the parimutuel betting literature has discussed estimating event outcome probabilities or developing optimal wagering strategies, particularly for horse race betting. Some betting pools, however, involve betting not just on a single event, but on a tuple of events. For example, pick six betting in horse racing, March Madness bracket challenges, and predicting a randomly drawn bitstring each involve making a series of individual forecasts. Although traditional optimal wagering strategies work well when the size of the tuple is very small (e.g., betting on the winner of a horse race), they are intractable for more general betting pools in higher dimensions (e.g., March Madness bracket challenges). Hence we pose the multi-brackets problem: supposing we wish to predict a tuple of events and that we know the true probabilities of each potential outcome of each event, what is the best way to tractably generate a set of $n$ predicted tuples? The most general version of this problem is extremely difficult, so we begin with a simpler setting. In particular, we generate $n$ independent predicted tuples according to a distribution having optimal entropy. This entropy-based approach is tractable, scalable, and performs well.
- American Gaming Association (2022). 2022 march madness wagering estimates. https://www.americangaming.org/resources/march-madness-2022/.
- Burke, M. (2023). 5 best free march madness bracket contests for 2023. https://www.thelines.com/best-march-madness-bracket-contests/.
- Carlin, B. P. (2005). Improved ncaa basketball tournament modeling via point spread and team strength information. In Anthology of Statistics in Sports, pages 149–153. SIAM.
- Carson, D. (2014). Warren buffett will pay $1 billion to fan with perfect march madness bracket. https://bleacherreport.com/articles/1931210-warren-buffet-will-pay-1- billion-to-fan-with-perfect-march-madness-bracket.
- Optimal Strategies for Sports Betting Pools. Operations Research, 55(6):1163–1177.
- Elements of Information Theory (Wiley Series in Telecommunications and Signal Processing). Wiley-Interscience, USA.
- Deshpande, A. (2017). Applying machine learning to march madness. https://adeshpande3.github.io/Applying-Machine-Learning-to-March-Madness.
- ESPN Sports Analytics Team (2016). Bpi and strength of record: What are they and how are they derived? https://www.espn.com/blog/statsinfo/post/_/id/125994/bpi-and-strength-of-record-what-are-they-and-how-are-they-derived.
- FiveThirtyEight (2022). 2022 march madness predictions. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2022-march-madness-predictions/.
- A machine learning approach to march madness.
- Georgia Institute of Technology (2023). Lrmc (classic) results through games of 3/5/2023. https://www2.isye.gatech.edu/~jsokol/lrmc/.
- Goto, K. (2021). Predicting march madness using machine learning. https://towardsdatascience.com/kaggle-march-madness-silver-medal- for-two-consecutive-years-6207ff63b86c.
- A machine learning strategy for predicting march madness winners. In 2015 IEEE/ACIS 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD), pages 1–6.
- March machine learning mania 2023.
- March madness prediction : A matrix completion approach.
- Junge, F. (2022). PoissonBinomial: Efficient Computation of Ordinary and Generalized Poisson Binomial Distributions. R package version 1.2.5.
- March madness and the office pool. Management Science, 47(3):369–382.
- March madness prediction: Different machine learning approaches with non-box score statistics. Managerial and Decision Economics.
- A logistic regression/markov chain model for ncaa basketball. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 53:788 – 803.
- Building an ncaa men’s basketball predictive model and quantifying its success. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 11(1):5–12.
- Massey, K. (2023). Massey ratings: Frequently asked questions. https://masseyratings.com/faq.php.
- Moore, S. (2023). Sonny moore’s computer power ratings. http://sonnymoorepowerratings.com/m-basket.htm.
- Ota, K. (2022). Espn men’s tournament challenge collects 17.3 million brackets. https://espnpressroom.com/us/press-releases/2022/03/espn-mens-tournament-challenge-collects-17-3-million-brackets/.
- Pomeroy, K. (2006). Ratings explanation. https://kenpom.com/blog/ratings-explanation/.
- R Core Team (2022). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
- reHOOPerate (2018). Training a neural network to fill out my march madness bracket. https://medium.com/re-hoop-per-rate/training-a-neural-network-to- fill-out-my-march-madness-bracket-2e5ee562eab1.
- Sagarin, J. (2023). Jeff sagarin’s college basketball ratings. http://sagarin.com/sports/cbsend.htm.
- More probability models for the ncaa regional basketball tournaments. The American Statistician, 50(1):34–38.
- Winning Ponies (2023). Types of horse racing wagers. https://www.winningponies.com/help/wager-types.html.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.