Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Signatures of afterglows from light dark matter boosted by supernova neutrinos in current and future large underground detectors

Published 7 Jul 2023 in hep-ph, astro-ph.CO, and astro-ph.HE | (2307.03522v3)

Abstract: Supernova neutrino boosted dark matter (SN$\nu$ BDM) and its afterglow effect have been shown to be a promising signature for beyond Standard Model (bSM) physics. The time-evolution feature of SN$\nu$ BDM allows for %the possibly direct inference of DM mass $m_\chi$, and results in significant background suppression with improving sensitivity. This paper extends the earlier study and provides a general framework for computing the SN$\nu$ BDM fluxes for a supernova that occurs at any location in our galaxy. A bSM $U(1){L\mu-L_\tau}$ model with its gauge boson coupling to both DM and the second and third generation of leptons is considered, which allows for both DM-$\nu$ and DM-$e$ interactions. Detailed analysis of the temporal profile, angular distribution, and energy spectrum of the SN$\nu$ BDM are performed. Unique signatures in SN$\nu$ BDM allowing extraction of $m_\chi$ and detail features that contain information of the underlying interaction type are discussed. Expected sensitivities on the above new physics model from Super-Kamiokande, Hyper-Kamiokande, and DUNE detections of BDM events induced by the next galactic SN are derived and compared with the existing bounds.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (42)
  1. M. Battaglieri et al., in U.S. Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter (2017) arXiv:1707.04591 [hep-ph] .
  2. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  3. B. Holdom, Phys. Lett. B 166, 196 (1986).
  4. P. Foldenauer, Phys. Rev. D 99, 035007 (2019), arXiv:1808.03647 [hep-ph] .
  5. G.-L. Lin and Y.-H. Lin, Phys. Rev. D 104, 063021 (2021), arXiv:2102.11151 [hep-ph] .
  6. M. Aguilar et al. (AMS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 211101 (2015).
  7. D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 021303 (2017a), arXiv:1608.07648 [astro-ph.CO] .
  8. M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT), Astrophys. J. 840, 43 (2017), arXiv:1704.03910 [astro-ph.HE] .
  9. D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 251302 (2017b), arXiv:1705.03380 [astro-ph.CO] .
  10. R. Agnese et al. (SuperCDMS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 051301 (2018), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 122, 069901 (2019)], arXiv:1804.10697 [hep-ex] .
  11. G. Ambrosi et al. (DAMPE), Nature 552, 63 (2017), arXiv:1711.10981 [astro-ph.HE] .
  12. E. Aprile et al. (XENON), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111302 (2018), arXiv:1805.12562 [astro-ph.CO] .
  13. E. Aprile et al. (XENON), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 251801 (2019a), arXiv:1907.11485 [hep-ex] .
  14. E. Aprile et al. (XENON), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 241803 (2019b), arXiv:1907.12771 [hep-ex] .
  15. O. Abramoff et al. (SENSEI), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 161801 (2019), arXiv:1901.10478 [hep-ex] .
  16. T. Bringmann and M. Pospelov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 171801 (2019), arXiv:1810.10543 [hep-ph] .
  17. C. V. Cappiello and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. D 100, 103011 (2019), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 104, 069901 (2021)], arXiv:1906.11283 [hep-ph] .
  18. Y. Zhang, PTEP 2022, 013B05 (2022), arXiv:2001.00948 [hep-ph] .
  19. J. Jaeckel and W. Yin, JCAP 02, 044 (2021), arXiv:2007.15006 [hep-ph] .
  20. A. Das and M. Sen, Phys. Rev. D 104, 075029 (2021), arXiv:2104.00027 [hep-ph] .
  21. K. Abe et al. (Super-Kamiokande), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 031802 (2023), arXiv:2209.14968 [hep-ex] .
  22. X. Cui et al. (PandaX-II), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 171801 (2022), arXiv:2112.08957 [hep-ex] .
  23. R. Xu et al. (CDEX),  (2022), arXiv:2201.01704 [hep-ex] .
  24. P. Carenza and P. De la Torre Luque, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 110 (2023), arXiv:2210.17206 [astro-ph.HE] .
  25. G. Adhikari et al. (COSINE-100),   (2023), arXiv:2306.00322 [hep-ex] .
  26. K. Abe et al. (Super-Kamiokande), Phys. Rev. D 94, 052010 (2016), arXiv:1606.07538 [hep-ex] .
  27. K. Abe et al. (Hyper-Kamiokande),   (2018), arXiv:1805.04163 [physics.ins-det] .
  28. B. Abi et al. (DUNE),  (2020), arXiv:2002.03005 [hep-ex] .
  29. A. Abusleme et al. (JUNO), Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 123, 103927 (2022), arXiv:2104.02565 [hep-ex] .
  30. K. Murase and I. M. Shoemaker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 241102 (2019), arXiv:1903.08607 [hep-ph] .
  31. J. M. Cline and M. Puel, JCAP 06, 004 (2023), arXiv:2301.08756 [hep-ph] .
  32. K. Akita and S. Ando,   (2023), arXiv:2305.01913 [astro-ph.CO] .
  33. W. D. Arnett and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1906 (1987).
  34. J. H. Davis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 211101 (2016), arXiv:1606.02558 [hep-ph] .
  35. M. G. Walker and J. Penarrubia, Astrophys. J. 742, 20 (2011), arXiv:1108.2404 [astro-ph.CO] .
  36. S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Rept. 730, 1 (2018), arXiv:1705.02358 [hep-ph] .
  37. S. Adhikari et al.,   (2022), arXiv:2207.10638 [astro-ph.CO] .
  38. M. Pospelov, Phys. Rev. D 80, 095002 (2009), arXiv:0811.1030 [hep-ph] .
  39. S. W. Li and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. C 89, 045801 (2014), arXiv:1402.4687 [hep-ph] .
  40. Y. Nakano (Super-Kamiokande), J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 888, 012191 (2017).
  41. B. Dutta and L. E. Strigari, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 137 (2019), arXiv:1901.08876 [hep-ph] .
  42. E. Hardy and R. Lasenby, JHEP 02, 033 (2017), arXiv:1611.05852 [hep-ph] .
Citations (2)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 3 likes about this paper.