Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 88 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 81 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 175 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 450 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Spin-$s$ Rational $Q$-system (2303.07640v4)

Published 14 Mar 2023 in hep-th, math-ph, math.MP, and nlin.SI

Abstract: Bethe ansatz equations for spin-$s$ Heisenberg spin chain with $s\ge1$ are significantly more difficult to analyze than the spin-$\tfrac{1}{2}$ case, due to the presence of repeated roots. As a result, it is challenging to derive extra conditions for the Bethe roots to be physical and study the related completeness problem. In this paper, we propose the rational $Q$-system for the XXX$_s$ spin chain. Solutions of the proposed $Q$-system give all and only physical solutions of the Bethe ansatz equations required by completeness. This is checked numerically and proved rigorously. The rational $Q$-system is equivalent to the requirement that the solution and the corresponding dual solution of the $TQ$-relation are both polynomials, which we prove rigorously. Based on this analysis, we propose the extra conditions for solutions of the XXX$_s$ Bethe ansatz equations to be physical.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (45)
  1. L. D. Faddeev, “How algebraic Bethe ansatz works for integrable model,” in Les Houches School of Physics: Astrophysical Sources of Gravitational Radiation, pp. pp. 149–219. 5, 1996. arXiv:hep-th/9605187.
  2. R. P. Langlands and Y. Saint-Aubin, “Algebro-geometric aspects of the Bethe equations,” in Strings and symmetries, pp. pp. 40–53. 1995.
  3. K. Fabricius and B. M. McCoy, “Bethe’s equation is incomplete for the XXZ model at roots of unity,” J. Statist. Phys. 103 (2001) 647–678, arXiv:cond-mat/0009279.
  4. R. J. Baxter, “Completeness of the Bethe ansatz for the six and eight vertex models,” J. Statist. Phys. 108 (2002) 1–48, arXiv:cond-mat/0111188.
  5. E. Mukhin, V. Tarasov, and A. Varchenko, “Bethe Algebra of Homogeneous XXX Heisenberg Model Has Simple Spectrum,” arXiv e-prints (June, 2007) arXiv:0706.0688, arXiv:0706.0688 [math.QA].
  6. L. V. Avdeev and A. A. Vladimirov, “ON EXCEPTIONAL SOLUTIONS OF THE BETHE ANSATZ EQUATIONS,” Theor. Math. Phys. 69 (1987) 1071.
  7. F. H. L. Essler, V. E. Korepin, and K. Schoutens, “Fine structure of the Bethe ansatz for the spin 1/2 Heisenberg XXX model,” J. Phys. A 25 (1992) 4115–4126.
  8. R. Siddharthan, “Singularities in the Bethe solution of the XXX and XXZ Heisenberg spin chains,” arXiv e-prints (Apr., 1998) cond–mat/9804210, arXiv:cond-mat/9804210 [cond-mat.str-el].
  9. Y. Miao, J. Lamers, and V. Pasquier, “On the Q operator and the spectrum of the XXZ model at root of unity,” SciPost Phys. 11 (2021) 067, arXiv:2012.10224 [cond-mat.stat-mech].
  10. R. J. Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics. Academic Press, 1982.
  11. C. Marboe and D. Volin, “Fast analytic solver of rational Bethe equations,” J. Phys. A 50 no. 20, (2017) 204002, arXiv:1608.06504 [math-ph].
  12. E. Granet and J. L. Jacobsen, “On zero-remainder conditions in the Bethe ansatz,” JHEP 03 (2020) 178, arXiv:1910.07797 [hep-th].
  13. Z. Bajnok, E. Granet, J. L. Jacobsen, and R. I. Nepomechie, “On Generalized Q𝑄Qitalic_Q-systems,” JHEP 03 (2020) 177, arXiv:1910.07805 [hep-th].
  14. R. I. Nepomechie, “Q-systems with boundary parameters,” arXiv:1912.12702 [hep-th].
  15. R. I. Nepomechie, “The Am(1)superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑚1A_{m}^{(1)}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Q-system,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35 no. 31, (2020) 2050260, arXiv:2003.06823 [hep-th].
  16. J. Gu, Y. Jiang, and M. Sperling, “Rational Q𝑄Qitalic_Q-systems, Higgsing and Mirror Symmetry,” arXiv:2208.10047 [hep-th].
  17. N. Reshetikhin, “ A method of functional equations in the theory of exactly solvable quantum systems,” Lett. Math. Phys. 7 (1983) 205–213.
  18. I. Krichever, O. Lipan, P. Wiegmann, and A. Zabrodin, “Quantum integrable systems and elliptic solutions of classical discrete nonlinear equations,” Commun. Math. Phys. 188 (1997) 267–304, arXiv:hep-th/9604080.
  19. V. Kazakov, A. S. Sorin, and A. Zabrodin, “Supersymmetric Bethe ansatz and Baxter equations from discrete Hirota dynamics,” Nucl. Phys. B 790 (2008) 345–413, arXiv:hep-th/0703147.
  20. V. V. Bazhanov and Z. Tsuboi, “Baxter’s Q-operators for supersymmetric spin chains,” Nucl. Phys. B 805 (2008) 451–516, arXiv:0805.4274 [hep-th].
  21. V. V. Bazhanov, T. Lukowski, C. Meneghelli, and M. Staudacher, “A Shortcut to the Q-Operator,” J. Stat. Mech. 1011 (2010) P11002, arXiv:1005.3261 [hep-th].
  22. V. Kazakov, S. Leurent, and Z. Tsuboi, “Baxter’s Q-operators and operatorial Backlund flow for quantum (super)-spin chains,” Commun. Math. Phys. 311 (2012) 787–814, arXiv:1010.4022 [math-ph].
  23. W. Hao, R. I. Nepomechie, and A. J. Sommese, “Completeness of solutions of Bethe’s equations,” Phys. Rev. E 88 no. 5, (2013) 052113, arXiv:1308.4645 [math-ph].
  24. R. I. Nepomechie and C. Wang, “Algebraic Bethe ansatz for singular solutions,” J. Phys. A 46 (2013) 325002, arXiv:1304.7978 [hep-th].
  25. R. I. Nepomechie and C. Wang, “Twisting singular solutions of Bethe’s equations,” J. Phys. A 47 no. 50, (2014) 505004, arXiv:1409.7382 [math-ph].
  26. G. P. Pronko and Y. G. Stroganov, “Bethe equations ’on the wrong side of equator’,” J. Phys. A 32 (1999) 2333–2340, arXiv:hep-th/9808153.
  27. W. Hao, R. I. Nepomechie, and A. J. Sommese, “Singular solutions, repeated roots and completeness for higher-spin chains,” J. Stat. Mech. 1403 (2014) P03024, arXiv:1312.2982 [math-ph].
  28. N. Kitanine, J. M. Maillet, G. Niccoli, and V. Terras, “On determinant representations of scalar products and form factors in the SoV approach: the XXX case,” J. Phys. A 49 no. 10, (2016) 104002, arXiv:1506.02630 [math-ph].
  29. J. M. Maillet and G. Niccoli, “On quantum separation of variables beyond fundamental representations,” SciPost Phys. 10 no. 2, (2021) 026, arXiv:1903.06618 [math-ph].
  30. Y. He, J. Hou, Y. Liu, and Z. Tan, “ Spin-s𝑠sitalic_s Q𝑄Qitalic_Q-system: twist and open boundaries,” to appear .
  31. A. N. Kirillov, “Combinatorial identities, and completeness of eigenstates of the Heisenberg magnet,” Journal of Soviet Mathematics 30 no. 4, (1985) 2298–2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02105347.
  32. H. Shu, P. Zhao, R.-D. Zhu, and H. Zou, “Bethe-State Counting and the Witten Index,” arXiv:2210.07116 [hep-th].
  33. H. M. Babujian, “EXACT SOLUTION OF THE ISOTROPIC HEISENBERG CHAIN WITH ARBITRARY SPINS: THERMODYNAMICS OF THE MODEL,” Nucl. Phys. B 215 (1983) 317–336.
  34. L. A. Takhtajan, “The picture of low-lying excitations in the isotropic Heisenberg chain of arbitrary spins,” Phys. Lett. A 87 (1982) 479–482.
  35. V. Tarasov, “Completeness of the Bethe Ansatz for the Periodic Isotropic Heisenberg Model,” Rev. Math. Phys. 30 (2018) 1840018.
  36. Y. Jiang and Y. Zhang, “Algebraic geometry and Bethe ansatz. Part I. The quotient ring for BAE,” JHEP 03 (2018) 087, arXiv:1710.04693 [hep-th].
  37. C. Closset and O. Khlaif, “Twisted indices, Bethe ideals and 3d 𝒩=2𝒩2\mathcal{N}=2caligraphic_N = 2 infrared dualities,” arXiv:2301.10753 [hep-th].
  38. J. Lykke Jacobsen, Y. Jiang, and Y. Zhang, “Torus partition function of the six-vertex model from algebraic geometry,” JHEP 03 (2019) 152, arXiv:1812.00447 [hep-th].
  39. Z. Bajnok, J. L. Jacobsen, Y. Jiang, R. I. Nepomechie, and Y. Zhang, “Cylinder partition function of the 6-vertex model from algebraic geometry,” JHEP 06 (2020) 169, arXiv:2002.09019 [hep-th].
  40. J. Böhm, J. L. Jacobsen, Y. Jiang, and Y. Zhang, “Geometric algebra and algebraic geometry of loop and Potts models,” JHEP 05 (2022) 068, arXiv:2202.02986 [hep-th].
  41. N. A. Nekrasov and S. L. Shatashvili, “Quantum integrability and supersymmetric vacua,” Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 177 (2009) 105–119, arXiv:0901.4748 [hep-th].
  42. N. A. Nekrasov and S. L. Shatashvili, “Supersymmetric vacua and Bethe ansatz,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 192-193 (2009) 91–112, arXiv:0901.4744 [hep-th].
  43. M. Bullimore, H.-C. Kim, and T. Lukowski, “Expanding the Bethe/Gauge Dictionary,” JHEP 11 (2017) 055, arXiv:1708.00445 [hep-th].
  44. O. Foda and M. Manabe, “Nested coordinate Bethe wavefunctions from the Bethe/gauge correspondence,” JHEP 11 (2019) 036, arXiv:1907.00493 [hep-th].
  45. P. Zhao and H. Zou, “Remarks on 2d Unframed Quiver Gauge Theories,” arXiv:2206.14793 [hep-th].
Citations (7)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 1 like.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to View

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

Explore Trending Papers

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube