Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 77 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 175 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 454 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Fast Bayesian inference for spatial mean-parameterized Conway-Maxwell-Poisson models (2301.11472v4)

Published 27 Jan 2023 in stat.ME, stat.AP, and stat.CO

Abstract: Count data with complex features arise in many disciplines, including ecology, agriculture, criminology, medicine, and public health. Zero inflation, spatial dependence, and non-equidispersion are common features in count data. There are two classes of models that allow for these features -- he mode-parameterized Conway--Maxwell--Poisson (COMP) distribution and the generalized Poisson model. However both require the use of either constraints on the parameter space or a parameterization that leads to challenges in interpretability. We propose a spatial mean-parameterized COMP model that retains the flexibility of these models while resolving the above issues. We use a Bayesian spatial filtering approach in order to efficiently handle high-dimensional spatial data and we use reversible-jump MCMC to automatically choose the basis vectors for spatial filtering. The COMP distribution poses two additional computational challenges -- an intractable normalizing function in the likelihood and no closed-form expression for the mean. We propose a fast computational approach that addresses these challenges by, respectively, introducing an efficient auxiliary variable algorithm and pre-computing key approximations for fast likelihood evaluation. We illustrate the application of our methodology to simulated and real datasets, including Texas HPV-cancer data and US vaccine refusal data.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (42)
  1. Akima, H. (1996). Algorithm 761: scattered-data surface fitting that has the accuracy of a cubic polynomial. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 22, 362–371.
  2. Bayesian inference, model selection and likelihood estimation using fast rejection sampling: the Conway-Maxwell-Poisson distribution. Bayesian Analysis 16, 905–931.
  3. Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 43(1), 1–20.
  4. Efficient Bayesian inference for COM-Poisson regression models. Statistics and Computing 28, 595–608.
  5. Conway, R. W. and W. L. Maxwell (1962). Network dispatching by the shortest-operation discipline. Operations Research 10, 51–73.
  6. Hybrid Monte Carlo. Physics letters B 195(2), 216–222.
  7. Efron, B. (1986). Double exponential families and their use in generalized linear regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81, 709–721.
  8. Famoye, F. (1993). Restricted generalized Poisson regression model. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 22, 1335–1354.
  9. Generalized Halton sequences in 2008: a comparative study. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 19, 15:1–15:31.
  10. Markov chain Monte Carlo: can we trust the third significant figure? Statistical Science 23, 250–260.
  11. mpcmp: mean-parametrized Conway–Maxwell–Poisson regression.
  12. Gebhardt, A. (2022). akima: interpolation of irregularly and regularly spaced data.
  13. Godsill, S. J. (2012). On the relationship between Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for model uncertainty. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 10, 230–248.
  14. Green, P. J. (1995). Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika 82, 711–732.
  15. Greene, W. H. (1994). Accounting for excess zeros and sample selection in Poisson and negative binomial regression models. Technical report, New York University.
  16. Guikema, S. D. and J. P. Goffelt (2008). A flexible count data regression model for risk analysis. Risk Analysis 28, 213–223.
  17. Guo, X. (2015). copCAR analysis of county-level HPV-related cancers in Texas for 2006–2012. Master’s thesis, The University of Minnesota.
  18. Restricted spatial regression in practice: geostatistical models, confounding, and robustness under model misspecification. Environmetrics 26, 243–254.
  19. Haran, M. (2011). Gaussian random field models for spatial data. In Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo, pp.  449–478. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  20. Huang, A. (2017). Mean-parametrized Conway–Maxwell–Poisson regression models for dispersed counts. Statistical Modelling 17, 359–380.
  21. Huang, A. and A. S. Kim (2019). Bayesian Conway–Maxwell–Poisson regression models for overdispersed and underdispersed counts. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 50, 3094–3105.
  22. Hughes, J. (2017). Spatial regression and the Bayesian filter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.04651.
  23. Dimension reduction and alleviation of confounding for spatial generalized linear mixed models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 75, 139–159.
  24. Fixed-width output analysis for Markov chain Monte Carlo. Journal of the American Statistical Association 101, 1537–1547.
  25. Spatial distribution and determinants of childhood vaccination refusal in the United States. Vaccine 41(20), 3189–3195.
  26. Khan, K. and C. A. Calder (2020). Restricted spatial regression methods: implications for inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 0, 1–13.
  27. Lambert, D. (1992). Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics 34, 1–14.
  28. MCMC for doubly-intractable distributions. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp.  359–366.
  29. Neal, R. M. et al. (2011). MCMC using Hamiltonian dynamics. In Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo, pp.  113–162. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  30. Modeling zero-modified count and semicontinuous data in health services research Part 1: background and overview. Statistics in Medicine 35, 5070–5093.
  31. A fast look-up method for Bayesian mean-parameterised Conway–Maxwell–Poisson regression models. Statistics and Computing 33, 81.
  32. Philipson, P. M. (2023). A truncated mean-parameterized Conway–Maxwell–Poisson model for the analysis of Test match bowlers. Statistical Modelling 0, 1–16.
  33. Ratcliffe, J. H. and E. S. Mccord (2007). A micro-spatial analysis of the demographic and criminogenic environment of drug markets in philadelphia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 40, 43–63.
  34. Effects of residual smoothing on the posterior of the fixed effects in disease-mapping models. Biometrics 62, 1197–1206.
  35. Reparametrization of COM–Poisson regression models with applications in the analysis of experimental data. Statistical Modelling 20, 443–466.
  36. Shaby, B. and M. T. Wells (2011). Exploring an adaptive Metropolis algorithm. Technical report, Department of Statistical Science, Duke University.
  37. A useful distribution for fitting discrete data: revival of the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics 54, 127–142.
  38. Watanabe, S. (2010). Asymptotic equivalence of Bayes cross validation and widely applicable information criterion in singular learning theory. Journal of Machine Learning Research 11, 3571–3594.
  39. Winkelmann, R. (1995). Duration dependence and dispersion in count-data models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13, 467–474.
  40. Yang, H. C. and J. R. Bradley (2022). Bayesian inference for spatial count data that may be over-dispersed or under-dispersed with application to the 2016 US presidential election. Journal of Data Science 20, 325–337.
  41. Zimmerman, D. L. and J. M. V. Hoef (2021). On deconfounding spatial confounding in linear models. The American Statistician 00, 1–9.
  42. Zou, Y. and S. R. Geedipally (2013). Evaluating the double Poisson generalized linear model. Accident Analysis and Prevention 59, 497–505.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 0 likes.