Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

de Sitter space, extremal surfaces and "time-entanglement"

Published 24 Oct 2022 in hep-th | (2210.12963v4)

Abstract: We refine previous investigations on de Sitter space and extremal surfaces anchored at the future boundary $I+$. Since such surfaces do not return, they require extra data or boundary conditions in the past (interior). In entirely Lorentzian de Sitter spacetime, this leads to future-past timelike surfaces stretching between $I\pm$. Apart from an overall $-i$ factor (relative to spacelike surfaces in $AdS$) their areas are real and positive. With a no-boundary type boundary condition, the top half of these timelike surfaces joins with a spacelike part on the hemisphere giving a complex-valued area. Motivated by these, we describe two aspects of "time-entanglement" in simple toy models in quantum mechanics. One is based on a future-past thermofield double type state entangling timelike separated states, which leads to entirely positive structures. Another is based on the time evolution operator and reduced transition amplitudes, which leads to complex-valued entropy.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (39)
  1. M. Spradlin, A. Strominger and A. Volovich, “Les Houches lectures on de Sitter space,” hep-th/0110007.
  2. A. Strominger, “The dS / CFT correspondence,” JHEP 0110, 034 (2001) [hep-th/0106113].
  3. E. Witten, “Quantum gravity in de Sitter space,” [hep-th/0106109].
  4. J. M. Maldacena, “Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,” JHEP 0305, 013 (2003), [astro-ph/0210603].
  5. D. Anninos, T. Hartman and A. Strominger, “Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence,” Class. Quant. Grav.  34, no. 1, 015009 (2017) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/34/1/015009 [arXiv:1108.5735 [hep-th]].
  6. J. M. Maldacena, “The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.  2, 231 (1998) [Int. J. Theor. Phys.  38, 1113 (1999)] [arXiv:hep-th/9711200].
  7. S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory,” Phys. Lett.  B 428, 105 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9802109].
  8. E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.  2, 253 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9802150].
  9. G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,” Phys. Rev. D 15, 2738 (1977). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2738
  10. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett.  96, 181602 (2006) [hep-th/0603001].
  11. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy,” JHEP 0608, 045 (2006) [hep-th/0605073].
  12. V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, “A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal,” JHEP 0707 (2007) 062 [arXiv:0705.0016 [hep-th]].
  13. K. Narayan, “de Sitter extremal surfaces,” Phys. Rev. D 91, no. 12, 126011 (2015) [arXiv:1501.03019 [hep-th]].
  14. K. Narayan, “de Sitter space and extremal surfaces for spheres,” Phys. Lett. B 753, 308 (2016) [arXiv:1504.07430 [hep-th]].
  15. Y. Sato, “Comments on Entanglement Entropy in the dS/CFT Correspondence,” Phys. Rev. D 91, no. 8, 086009 (2015) [arXiv:1501.04903 [hep-th]].
  16. M. Miyaji and T. Takayanagi, “Surface/State Correspondence as a Generalized Holography,” PTEP 2015, no. 7, 073B03 (2015) doi:10.1093/ptep/ptv089 [arXiv:1503.03542 [hep-th]].
  17. K. Narayan, “On extremal surfaces and de Sitter entropy,” Phys. Lett. B 779, 214 (2018) [arXiv:1711.01107 [hep-th]].
  18. K. Narayan, “de Sitter future-past extremal surfaces and the entanglement wedge,” Phys. Rev. D 101, no.8, 086014 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.086014 [arXiv:2002.11950 [hep-th]].
  19. T. Hartman and J. Maldacena, “Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy from Black Hole Interiors,” JHEP 1305, 014 (2013) [arXiv:1303.1080 [hep-th]].
  20. Y. Hikida, T. Nishioka, T. Takayanagi and Y. Taki, “CFT duals of three-dimensional de Sitter gravity,” JHEP 05, 129 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2022)129 [arXiv:2203.02852 [hep-th]].
  21. Y. Hikida, T. Nishioka, T. Takayanagi and Y. Taki, “Holography in de Sitter Space via Chern-Simons Gauge Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, no.4, 041601 (2022) [arXiv:2110.03197 [hep-th]].
  22. Y. Chen, V. Gorbenko and J. Maldacena, “Bra-ket wormholes in gravitationally prepared states,” JHEP 02, 009 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)009 [arXiv:2007.16091 [hep-th]].
  23. K. Goswami, K. Narayan and H. K. Saini, “Cosmologies, singularities and quantum extremal surfaces,” JHEP 03, 201 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2022)201 [arXiv:2111.14906 [hep-th]].
  24. K. Narayan, “On d⁢S4𝑑subscript𝑆4dS_{4}italic_d italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT extremal surfaces and entanglement entropy in some ghost CFTs,” Phys. Rev. D 94, no. 4, 046001 (2016) [arXiv:1602.06505 [hep-th]].
  25. D. P. Jatkar and K. Narayan, “Ghost-spin chains, entanglement and b⁢c𝑏𝑐bcitalic_b italic_c-ghost CFTs,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 10, 106015 (2017) [arXiv:1706.06828 [hep-th]].
  26. C. Arias, F. Diaz and P. Sundell, “De Sitter Space and Entanglement,” Class. Quant. Grav.  37, no. 1, 015009 (2020) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab5b78 [arXiv:1901.04554 [hep-th]].
  27. C. Arias, F. Diaz, R. Olea and P. Sundell, “Liouville description of conical defects in dS44{}_{4}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT, Gibbons-Hawking entropy as modular entropy, and dS33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT holography,” JHEP 04, 124 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2020)124 [arXiv:1906.05310 [hep-th]].
  28. K. Doi, J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi and Y. Taki, “Pseudo Entropy in dS/CFT and Time-like Entanglement Entropy,” [arXiv:2210.09457 [hep-th]].
  29. J. M. Maldacena, “Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,” JHEP 0304, 021 (2003) [hep-th/0106112].
  30. J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, “Wave Function of the Universe,” Phys. Rev. D 28, 2960-2975 (1983) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.28.2960
  31. J. Maldacena, G. J. Turiaci and Z. Yang, “Two dimensional Nearly de Sitter gravity,” JHEP 01, 139 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2021)139 [arXiv:1904.01911 [hep-th]].
  32. R. Bousso and S. W. Hawking, “The Probability for primordial black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 52, 5659-5664 (1995) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.52.5659 [arXiv:gr-qc/9506047 [gr-qc]].
  33. R. Bousso and S. W. Hawking, “Pair creation of black holes during inflation,” Phys. Rev. D 54, 6312-6322 (1996) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.54.6312 [arXiv:gr-qc/9606052 [gr-qc]].
  34. C. Holzhey, F. Larsen and F. Wilczek, “Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 424, 443 (1994) [hep-th/9403108].
  35. P. Calabrese and J. L. Cardy, “Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory,” J. Stat. Mech.  0406, P06002 (2004) [hep-th/0405152].
  36. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, “Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory,” J. Phys. A 42, 504005 (2009) doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/50/504005 [arXiv:0905.4013 [cond-mat.stat-mech]].
  37. Y. Nakata, T. Takayanagi, Y. Taki, K. Tamaoka and Z. Wei, “New holographic generalization of entanglement entropy,” Phys. Rev. D 103, no.2, 026005 (2021) [arXiv:2005.13801 [hep-th]].
  38. K. Narayan and Hitesh K. Saini, “Notes on time entanglement and pseudo-entropy,” [arXiv:2303.01307 [hep-th]].
  39. A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, “Generalized gravitational entropy,” JHEP 08, 090 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2013)090 [arXiv:1304.4926 [hep-th]].
Citations (43)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 4 likes about this paper.