Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 60 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 35 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 176 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 448 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The Gauge Picture of Quantum Dynamics (2210.09314v5)

Published 17 Oct 2022 in quant-ph and cond-mat.str-el

Abstract: Although local Hamiltonians exhibit local time dynamics, this locality is not explicit in the Schr\"{o}dinger picture in the sense that the wavefunction amplitudes do not obey a local equation of motion. We show that geometric locality can be achieved explicitly in the equations of motion by "gauging" the global unitary invariance of quantum mechanics into a local gauge invariance. That is, expectation values $\langle \psi|A|\psi \rangle$ are invariant under a global unitary transformation acting on the wavefunction $|\psi\rangle \to U |\psi\rangle$ and operators $A \to U A U\dagger$, and we show that it is possible to gauge this global invariance into a local gauge invariance. To do this, we replace the wavefunction with a collection of local wavefunctions $|\psi_J\rangle$, one for each patch of space $J$. The collection of spatial patches is chosen to cover the space; e.g. we could choose the patches to be single qubits or nearest-neighbor sites on a lattice. Local wavefunctions associated with neighboring pairs of spatial patches $I$ and $J$ are related to each other by dynamical unitary transformations $U_{IJ}$. The local wavefunctions are local in the sense that their dynamics are local. That is, the equations of motion for the local wavefunctions $|\psi_J\rangle$ and connections $U_{IJ}$ are explicitly local in space and only depend on nearby Hamiltonian terms. (The local wavefunctions are many-body wavefunctions and have the same Hilbert space dimension as the usual wavefunction.) We call this picture of quantum dynamics the gauge picture since it exhibits a local gauge invariance. The local dynamics of a single spatial patch is related to the interaction picture, where the interaction Hamiltonian consists of only nearby Hamiltonian terms. We can also generalize the explicit locality to include locality in local charge and energy densities.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. “Information flow in entangled quantum systems”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 456, 1759 (2000). arXiv:quant-ph/9906007.
  2. “String-net condensation: A physical mechanism for topological phases”. Phys. Rev. B71, 045110 (2005). arXiv:cond-mat/0404617.
  3. “Deconfined Quantum Critical Points”. Science 303, 1490–1494 (2004). arXiv:cond-mat/0311326.
  4. Beni Yoshida. “Exotic topological order in fractal spin liquids”. Phys. Rev. B88, 125122 (2013). arXiv:1302.6248.
  5. Kevin Hartnett. “Matrix multiplication inches closer to mythic goal”. Quanta Magazine (2021). url: https://www.quantamagazine.org/mathematicians-inch-closer-to-matrix-multiplication-goal-20210323/.
  6. Volker Strassen. “Gaussian elimination is not optimal”. Numerische Mathematik 13, 354–356 (1969).
  7. Kevin Slagle. “Quantum Gauge Networks: A New Kind of Tensor Network”. Quantum 7, 1113 (2023). arXiv:2210.12151.
  8. Román Orús. “A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states”. Annals of Physics 349, 117–158 (2014). arXiv:1306.2164.
  9. “Isometric Tensor Network States in Two Dimensions”. Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 037201 (2020). arXiv:1902.05100.
  10. Steven Weinberg. “Testing quantum mechanics”. Annals of Physics 194, 336–386 (1989).
  11. N. Gisin. “Weinberg’s non-linear quantum mechanics and supraluminal communications”. Physics Letters A 143, 1–2 (1990).
  12. Joseph Polchinski. “Weinberg’s nonlinear quantum mechanics and the einstein-podolsky-rosen paradox”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 397–400 (1991).
  13. Kevin Slagle. “Testing Quantum Mechanics using Noisy Quantum Computers” (2021). arXiv:2108.02201.
  14. Brian Swingle. “Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time-order correlators”. Nature Physics 14, 988–990 (2018).
  15. “Out-of-time-order correlators and quantum chaos” (2022). arXiv:2209.07965.
  16. “Many-Body Localization and Thermalization in Quantum Statistical Mechanics”. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 6, 15–38 (2015). arXiv:1404.0686.
  17. “Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement”. Reviews of Modern Physics 91, 021001 (2019). arXiv:1804.11065.
  18. “Much Ado About Something: Why Lieb-Robinson bounds are useful” (2011). arXiv:1102.0835.
  19. “Lieb-robinson bound and the butterfly effect in quantum field theories”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 091602 (2016). arXiv:1603.09298.
  20. “Tightening the lieb-robinson bound in locally interacting systems”. PRX Quantum 1, 010303 (2020). arXiv:1908.03997.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 0 likes.