Quantifying Unknown Quantum Entanglement via a Hybrid Quantum-Classical Machine Learning Framework (2204.11500v1)
Abstract: Quantifying unknown quantum entanglement experimentally is a difficult task, but also becomes more and more necessary because of the fast development of quantum engineering. Machine learning provides practical solutions to this fundamental problem, where one has to train a proper machine learning model to predict entanglement measures of unknown quantum states based on experimentally measurable data, say moments or correlation data produced by local measurements. In this paper, we compare the performance of these two different machine learning approaches systematically. Particularly, we first show that the approach based on moments enjoys a remarkable advantage over that based on correlation data, though the cost of measuring moments is much higher. Next, since correlation data is much easier to obtain experimentally, we try to better its performance by proposing a hybrid quantum-classical machine learning framework for this problem, where the key is to train optimal local measurements to generate more informative correlation data. Our numerical simulations show that the new framework brings us comparable performance with the approach based on moments to quantify unknown entanglement. Our work implies that it is already practical to fulfill such tasks on near-term quantum devices.
- C. H. Bennett and S. J. Wiesner, Physical review letters 69, 2881 (1992).
- A. K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991).
- I. L. Chuang and M. A. Nielsen, Journal of Modern Optics 44, 2455 (1997).
- S. Van Enk and C. Beenakker, Physical review letters 108, 110503 (2012).
- Z. Wei and L. Lin, Physical Review A 103, 032215 (2021).
- L. Lin and Z. Wei, Physical Review A 104, 062433 (2021).
- P. Horodecki, Physical review letters 90, 167901 (2003).
- S. Shalev-Shwartz and S. Ben-David, Understanding machine learning: From theory to algorithms (Cambridge university press, 2014).
- D. Wolpert and W. Macready, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 1, 67 (1997).
- B. Schumacher and M. A. Nielsen, Physical Review A 54, 2629 (1996).
- S. Lloyd, Physical Review A 55, 1613 (1997).
- V. Vedral, Reviews of Modern Physics 74, 197 (2002).
- V. Vedral and M. B. Plenio, Physical Review A 57, 1619 (1998).
- S. Zohren and R. D. Gill, Physical review letters 100, 120406 (2008).
- T.-C. Wei, Physical Review A 78, 012327 (2008).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.