Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 85 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 72 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 170 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 457 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A 6.4yr optical quasi-periodic oscillations in SDSS J075217.84+193542.2: a new candidate for central binary black hole system (2202.11995v1)

Published 24 Feb 2022 in astro-ph.GA and astro-ph.HE

Abstract: In this manuscript, a 6.4yr optical quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) is detected in the quasar SDSS J075217.84+193542.2 (=\obj) at a redshift 0.117, of which 13.6yr-long light curve from CSS and ASAS-SN directly described by a sinusoidal function with a periodicity 6.4yr. The 6.4yr QPOs can be further confirmed through the Generalized Lomb-Scargle periodogram with confidence level higher than 99.99\%, and through the auto-correlation analysis results, and through the WWZ technique. The optical QPOs strongly indicate a central binary black hole (BBH) system in \obj. The determined two broad Gaussian components in the broad H$\alpha$ can lead to the BBH system with expected space separation about 0.02pc between the expected two central BHs with determined virial BH masses about $8.8\times107{\rm M_\odot}$ and $1.04\times109{\rm M_\odot}$. Meanwhile, we check the disk precessions applied to explain the optical QPOs. However, under the disk precession assumption, the determined optical emission regions from central BH have sizes about $40{\rm R_G}$ two times smaller than sizes of the expected NUV emission regions through the correlation between disk size and BH mass, indicating the disk precessions are not preferred. And due to the lower radio loudness around 0.28, jet precessions can be also totally ruled out. Furthermore, only 0.08\% probability can determined as the QPOs mis-detected through light curves randomly created by the CAR process, re-confirming the reported optical QPOs.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)