Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

BITES: Balanced Individual Treatment Effect for Survival data (2201.03448v1)

Published 5 Jan 2022 in stat.ME and cs.LG

Abstract: Estimating the effects of interventions on patient outcome is one of the key aspects of personalized medicine. Their inference is often challenged by the fact that the training data comprises only the outcome for the administered treatment, and not for alternative treatments (the so-called counterfactual outcomes). Several methods were suggested for this scenario based on observational data, i.e.~data where the intervention was not applied randomly, for both continuous and binary outcome variables. However, patient outcome is often recorded in terms of time-to-event data, comprising right-censored event times if an event does not occur within the observation period. Albeit their enormous importance, time-to-event data is rarely used for treatment optimization. We suggest an approach named BITES (Balanced Individual Treatment Effect for Survival data), which combines a treatment-specific semi-parametric Cox loss with a treatment-balanced deep neural network; i.e.~we regularize differences between treated and non-treated patients using Integral Probability Metrics (IPM). We show in simulation studies that this approach outperforms the state of the art. Further, we demonstrate in an application to a cohort of breast cancer patients that hormone treatment can be optimized based on six routine parameters. We successfully validated this finding in an independent cohort. BITES is provided as an easy-to-use python implementation.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (10)
  1. Stefan Schrod (3 papers)
  2. Andreas Schäfer (135 papers)
  3. Stefan Solbrig (8 papers)
  4. Robert Lohmayer (20 papers)
  5. Wolfram Gronwald (3 papers)
  6. Peter J. Oefner (4 papers)
  7. Tim Beißbarth (1 paper)
  8. Rainer Spang (9 papers)
  9. Helena U. Zacharias (5 papers)
  10. Michael Altenbuchinger (8 papers)
Citations (18)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.