Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Implicit representation of sparse hereditary families

Published 2 Jan 2022 in math.CO and cs.DM | (2201.00328v1)

Abstract: For a hereditary family of graphs $\FF$, let $\FF_n$ denote the set of all members of $\FF$ on $n$ vertices. The speed of $\FF$ is the function $f(n)=|\FF_n|$. An implicit representation of size $\ell(n)$ for $\FF_n$ is a function assigning a label of $\ell(n)$ bits to each vertex of any given graph $G \in \FF_n$, so that the adjacency between any pair of vertices can be determined by their labels. Bonamy, Esperet, Groenland and Scott proved that the minimum possible size of an implicit representation of $\FF_n$ for any hereditary family $\FF$ with speed $2{\Omega(n2)}$ is $(1+o(1)) \log_2 |\FF_n|/n~(=\Theta(n))$. A recent result of Hatami and Hatami shows that the situation is very different for very sparse hereditary families. They showed that for every $\delta>0$ there are hereditary families of graphs with speed $2{O(n \log n)}$ that do not admit implicit representations of size smaller than $n{1/2-\delta}$. In this note we show that even a mild speed bound ensures an implicit representation of size $O(nc)$ for some $c<1$. Specifically we prove that for every $\eps>0$ there is an integer $d \geq 1$ so that if $\FF$ is a hereditary family with speed $f(n) \leq 2{(1/4-\eps)n2}$ then $\FF_n$ admits an implicit representation of size $O(n{1-1/d} \log n)$. Moreover, for every integer $d>1$ there is a hereditary family for which this is tight up to the logarithmic factor.

Citations (4)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.