Toward a Perspectivist Turn in Ground Truthing for Predictive Computing (2109.04270v3)
Abstract: Most Artificial Intelligence applications are based on supervised ML, which ultimately grounds on manually annotated data. The annotation process is often performed in terms of a majority vote and this has been proved to be often problematic, as highlighted by recent studies on the evaluation of ML models. In this article we describe and advocate for a different paradigm, which we call data perspectivism, which moves away from traditional gold standard datasets, towards the adoption of methods that integrate the opinions and perspectives of the human subjects involved in the knowledge representation step of ML processes. Drawing on previous works which inspired our proposal we describe the potential of our proposal for not only the more subjective tasks (e.g. those related to human language) but also to tasks commonly understood as objective (e.g. medical decision making), and present the main advantages of adopting a perspectivist stance in ML, as well as possible disadvantages, and various ways in which such a stance can be implemented in practice. Finally, we share a set of recommendations and outline a research agenda to advance the perspectivist stance in ML.
- Eickhoff, C.: Cognitive biases in crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of the eleventh ACM international conference on web search and data mining. pp. 162–170 (2018)
- Krippendorff, K.: Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications (2018)
- Noble, J.A.: Minority voices of crowdsourcing: Why we should pay attention to every member of the crowd. In: proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work companion. pp. 179–182 (2012)
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.