Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 75 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 39 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 35 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 131 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 168 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 440 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Systematic evaluation of variability detection methods for eROSITA (2106.14529v2)

Published 28 Jun 2021 in astro-ph.HE, astro-ph.IM, stat.CO, and stat.ME

Abstract: The reliability of detecting source variability in sparsely and irregularly sampled X-ray light curves is investigated. This is motivated by the unprecedented survey capabilities of eROSITA onboard SRG, providing light curves for many thousand sources in its final-depth equatorial deep field survey. Four methods for detecting variability are evaluated: excess variance, amplitude maximum deviations, Bayesian blocks and a new Bayesian formulation of the excess variance. We judge the false detection rate of variability based on simulated Poisson light curves of constant sources, and calibrate significance thresholds. Simulations with flares injected favour the amplitude maximum deviation as most sensitive at low false detections. Simulations with white and red stochastic source variability favour Bayesian methods. The results are applicable also for the million sources expected in eROSITA's all-sky survey.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.