Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 57 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 93 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 176 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 449 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Charge-Order on the Triangular Lattice: A Mean-Field Study for the Lattice $S=1/2$ Fermionic Gas (2105.01472v1)

Published 4 May 2021 in cond-mat.str-el, cond-mat.mes-hall, cond-mat.other, cond-mat.quant-gas, and cond-mat.stat-mech

Abstract: The adsorbed atoms exhibit tendency to occupy a triangular lattice formed by periodic potential of the underlying crystal surface. Such a lattice is formed by, e.g., a single layer of graphane or the graphite surfaces as well as (111) surface of face-cubic center crystals. In the present work, an extension of the lattice gas model to $S=1/2$ fermionic particles on the two-dimensional triangular (hexagonal) lattice is analyzed. In such a model, each lattice site can be occupied not by only one particle, but by two particles, which interact with each other by onsite $U$ and intersite $W_{1}$ and $W_{2}$ (nearest and next-nearest-neighbor, respectively) density-density interaction. The investigated hamiltonian has a form of the extended Hubbard model in the atomic limit (i.e., the zero-bandwidth limit). In the analysis of the phase diagrams and thermodynamic properties of this model with repulsive $W_{1}>0$, the variational approach is used, which treats the onsite interaction term exactly and the intersite interactions within the mean-field approximation. The ground state ($T=0$) diagram for $W_{2}\leq0$ as well as finite temperature ($T>0$) phase diagrams for $W_{2}=0$ are presented. Two different types of charge order within $\sqrt{3} \times \sqrt{3}$ unit cell can occur. At $T=0$, for $W_{2}=0$ phase separated states are degenerated with homogeneous phases (but $T>0$ removes this degeneration), whereas attractive $W_2<0$ stabilizes phase separation at incommensurate fillings. For $U/W_{1}<0$ and $U/W_{1}>1/2$ only the phase with two different concentrations occurs (together with two different phase separated states occurring), whereas for small repulsive $0<U/W_{1}<1/2$ the other ordered phase also appears (with tree different concentrations in sublattices). The qualitative differences with the model considered on hypercubic lattices are also discussed.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.