Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Fairness and Transparency in Recommendation: The Users' Perspective (2103.08786v1)

Published 16 Mar 2021 in cs.IR, cs.AI, and cs.HC

Abstract: Though recommender systems are defined by personalization, recent work has shown the importance of additional, beyond-accuracy objectives, such as fairness. Because users often expect their recommendations to be purely personalized, these new algorithmic objectives must be communicated transparently in a fairness-aware recommender system. While explanation has a long history in recommender systems research, there has been little work that attempts to explain systems that use a fairness objective. Even though the previous work in other branches of AI has explored the use of explanations as a tool to increase fairness, this work has not been focused on recommendation. Here, we consider user perspectives of fairness-aware recommender systems and techniques for enhancing their transparency. We describe the results of an exploratory interview study that investigates user perceptions of fairness, recommender systems, and fairness-aware objectives. We propose three features -- informed by the needs of our participants -- that could improve user understanding of and trust in fairness-aware recommender systems.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Nasim Sonboli (10 papers)
  2. Jessie J. Smith (6 papers)
  3. Florencia Cabral Berenfus (1 paper)
  4. Robin Burke (40 papers)
  5. Casey Fiesler (13 papers)
Citations (62)