Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Validating UTF-8 In Less Than One Instruction Per Byte (2010.03090v4)

Published 6 Oct 2020 in cs.DB

Abstract: The majority of text is stored in UTF-8, which must be validated on ingestion. We present the lookup algorithm, which outperforms UTF-8 validation routines used in many libraries and languages by more than 10 times using commonly available SIMD instructions. To ensure reproducibility, our work is freely available as open source software.

Citations (7)

Summary

  • The paper introduces the Lookup algorithm, which accelerates UTF-8 validation using SIMD techniques to achieve less than one instruction per byte.
  • It employs vectorized table lookups and concurrent byte processing to process data blocks efficiently, reaching up to 66 GiB/s on ASCII inputs.
  • Benchmark results on x64 processors show the algorithm outperforms traditional branchy and finite-state methods, mitigating UTF-8 validation bottlenecks.

Validating UTF-8 in Less Than One Instruction Per Byte

The paper "Validating UTF-8 in Less Than One Instruction Per Byte" by John Keiser and Daniel Lemire presents a novel algorithm, referred to as \Lookup{}, for efficient UTF-8 validation using SIMD instructions. This research is pivotal for text processing systems where UTF-8 encoding is ubiquitous. The algorithm is shown to outperform conventional validation methods by a significant margin, achieving speeds up to ten times faster than existing routines.

Algorithm Overview

The authors introduce the \Lookup{} algorithm, designed to expedite UTF-8 validation. This algorithm leverages single-instruction-multiple-data (SIMD) techniques to process multiple bytes concurrently, utilizing the intrinsic parallelism of modern processors. A key innovation in \Lookup{} is its ability to validate UTF-8 encoding with less than one instruction per byte.

The algorithm works by using vectorized classification to detect invalid 2-byte sequences. It applies vectorized table lookups for classification, a technique the authors have previously documented. The \Lookup{} algorithm processes the input in blocks and uses vector operations to detect errors, significantly reducing dependency on branching logic which can cause performance bottlenecks.

Experimental Results

The authors conduct rigorous benchmarking on x64 processors, including Intel's Skylake and AMD's Zen 2 architectures. The performance testing spans various input types, including real-world datasets like JSON and HTML files, as well as synthetically generated UTF-8 data.

The \Lookup{} algorithm achieves remarkable throughput, reaching up to 66 GiB/s on ASCII inputs, surpassing the traditional memcpy function in speed. Across different conditions, it consistently outperforms other methods such as the branchy validator and finite-state machine approaches. Specifically, \Lookup{} exhibits greatly reduced instruction counts per byte validated, often achieving under one instruction per byte.

Implications and Future Directions

The results emphasize the potential of SIMD-based solutions for accelerating text processing tasks, which are critical as data volumes increase. One of the significant practical implications is the potential to mitigate UTF-8 validation as a bottleneck in high-performance systems, including web servers and database engines.

Looking forward, the advent of more advanced instruction sets such as AVX-512 and ARM's SVE could be explored to further enhance the performance of UTF-8 validation. This work could also inspire similar approaches in the acceleration of other encoding formats or data validation tasks, expanding the horizon for SIMD application in data-intensive computing.

Conclusion

This paper presents an enhanced algorithm for UTF-8 validation that significantly improves speed and efficiency using SIMD instructions available on commodity processors. The success of the \Lookup{} algorithm underscores the value of leveraging hardware capabilities for software optimizations, providing a foundational basis for future explorations in the field of high-speed text processing.

Whiteboard

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 5 tweets with 571 likes about this paper.