Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 88 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 81 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 175 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 450 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Tinkering with Lattices: A New Take on the Erdős Distance Problem (2009.12450v2)

Published 25 Sep 2020 in math.NT

Abstract: The Erd\H{o}s distance problem concerns the least number of distinct distances that can be determined by $N$ points in the plane. The integer lattice with $N$ points is known as \textit{near-optimal}, as it spans $\Theta(N/\sqrt{\log(N)})$ distinct distances, the lower bound for a set of $N$ points (Erd\H{o}s, 1946). The only previous non-asymptotic work related to the Erd\H{o}s distance problem that has been done was for $N \leq 13$. We take a new non-asymptotic approach to this problem in a model case, studying the distance distribution, or in other words, the plot of frequencies of each distance of the $N\times N$ integer lattice. In order to fully characterize this distribution, we adapt previous number-theoretic results from Fermat and Erd\H{o}s in order to relate the frequency of a given distance on the lattice to the sum-of-squares formula. We study the distance distributions of all the lattice's possible subsets; although this is a restricted case, the structure of the integer lattice allows for the existence of subsets which can be chosen so that their distance distributions have certain properties, such as emulating the distribution of randomly distributed sets of points for certain small subsets, or emulating that of the larger lattice itself. We define an error which compares the distance distribution of a subset with that of the full lattice. The structure of the integer lattice allows us to take subsets with certain geometric properties in order to maximize error; we show these geometric constructions explicitly. Further, we calculate explicit upper bounds for the error when the number of points in the subset is $4$, $5$, $9$ or $\left \lceil N2/2\right\rceil$ and prove a lower bound in cases with a small number of points.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.