Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 73 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 42 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 39 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 85 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 202 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 464 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 34 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Revisiting the distance, environment and supernova properties of SNR G57.2+0.8 that hosts SGR 1935+2154 (2005.03517v2)

Published 7 May 2020 in astro-ph.HE

Abstract: We have performed a multi-wavelength study of supernova remnant (SNR) G57.2+0.8 and its environment. The SNR hosts the magnetar SGR 1935+2154, which emitted an extremely bright ms-duration radio burst on 2020 Apr 28 (The Chime/Frb Collaboration et al. 2020; Bochenek et al. 2020). We used the 12CO and 13CO J=1-0 data from the Milky Way Image Scroll Painting (MWISP) CO line survey to search for molecular gas associated with G57.2+0.8, in order to constrain the physical parameters (e.g., the distance) of the SNR and its magnetar. We report that SNR G57.2+0.8 is likely impacting the molecular clouds (MCs) at the local standard of rest (LSR) velocity V_{LSR} ~ 30 km/s and excites a weak 1720 MHz OH maser with a peak flux density of 47 mJy/beam. The chance coincidence of a random OH spot falling in the SNR is <12%, and the OH-CO correspondence chance is 7% at the maser spot. This combines to give < 1% false probability of the OH maser, suggesting a real maser detection. The LSR velocity of the MCs places the SNR and magnetar at a kinematic distance of d=6.6 +/- 0.7 kpc. The nondetection of thermal X-ray emission from the SNR and the relatively dense environment suggests G57.2+0.8 be an evolved SNR with an age $t>1.6 \times 104$ (d/6.6 kpc) yr. The explosion energy of G57.2+0.8 is lower than $2 \times 10{51}(n_0/10 cm{-3}){1.16} (d/~6.6 kpc){3.16}$ erg, which is not very energetic even assuming a high ambient density $n_0$ = 10 cm${-3}$. This reinforces the opinion that magnetars do not necessarily result from very energetic supernova explosions.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.