Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 43 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 180 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 443 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 32 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Prospects of high redshift constraints on dark energy models with the Ep- Eiso correlation in long Gamma Ray Bursts (1911.08228v2)

Published 19 Nov 2019 in astro-ph.CO

Abstract: So far large and different data sets revealed the accelerated expansion rate of the Universe, which is usually explained in terms of dark energy. The nature of dark energy is not yet known, and several models have been introduced: a non zero cosmological constant, a potential energy of some scalar field, effects related to the non homogeneous distribution of matter, or effects due to alternative theories of gravity. Recently, a tension with the flat {\Lambda}CDM model has been discovered using a high-redshift Hubble diagram of supernovae, quasars, and gamma-ray bursts. Here we use the Union2 type Ia supernovae (SNIa) and Gamma Ray Bursts (GRB) Hubble diagram, and a set of direct measurements of the Hubble parameter to explore different dark energy models. We use the Chevallier-Polarski- Linder (CPL) parametrization of the dark energy equation of state (EOS), a minimally coupled quintessence scalar field, and, finally, we consider models with dark energy at early times (EDE). We perform a statistical analysis based on the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method, and explore the probability distributions of the cosmological parameters for each of the competing models. We apply the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) to compare these models: our analysis indicates that an evolving dark energy, described by a scalar field with exponential potential seems to be favoured by observational data.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.