Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 147 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 96 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 188 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 398 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Phase transition in the Kolkata Paise Restaurant problem (1905.13206v5)

Published 30 May 2019 in physics.soc-ph and cond-mat.stat-mech

Abstract: A novel phase transition behaviour is observed in the Kolkata Paise Restaurant (KPR) problem where large number ($N$) of agents or customers collectively (and iteratively) learn to choose among the $N$ restaurants where she would expect to be alone that evening and would get the only dish available there (or may get randomly picked up if more than one agent arrive there that evening). The players are expected to evolve their strategy such that the publicly available information about past crowd in different restaurants can be utilized and each of them is able to make the best minority choice. For equally ranked restaurants we follow two crowd-avoiding strategies: Strategy I, where each of the $n_i(t)$ number of agents arriving at the $i$-th restaurant on the $t$-th evening goes back to the same restaurant on the next evening with probability $[n_i(t)]{-\alpha}$, while in Strategy II, with probability $p$, when $n_i(t) > 1$. We study the steady state ($t$-independent) utilization fraction $f:(1-f)$ giving the steady state (wastage) fraction of restaurants going without any customer in any particular evening. With both the strategies we find, near $\alpha_c=0_+$ (in strategy I) or $p=1_-$ (in strategy II), the steady state wastage fraction $(1-f)\propto(\alpha - \alpha_c){\beta}$ or $(p_c - p)\beta$ with $\beta \simeq 0.8, 0.87, 1.0$ and the convergence time $\tau$ (for $f(t)$ becoming independent of $t$) varies as $\tau\propto{(\alpha-\alpha_c)}{-\gamma}$ or ${(p_c-p)}{-\gamma}$, with $\gamma \simeq 1.18, 1.11, 1.05$ in infinite-dimension (rest of the $N-1$ neighboring restaurants), three-dimension ($6$ neighbors) and two-dimension ($4$ neighbors) respectively.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.