Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Leveling the Playing Field -- Fairness in AI Versus Human Game Benchmarks (1903.07008v4)

Published 17 Mar 2019 in cs.AI

Abstract: From the beginning if the history of AI, there has been interest in games as a platform of research. As the field developed, human-level competence in complex games became a target researchers worked to reach. Only relatively recently has this target been finally met for traditional tabletop games such as Backgammon, Chess and Go. Current research focus has shifted to electronic games, which provide unique challenges. As is often the case with AI research, these results are liable to be exaggerated or misrepresented by either authors or third parties. The extent to which these games benchmark consist of fair competition between human and AI is also a matter of debate. In this work, we review the statements made by authors and third parties in the general media and academic circle about these game benchmark results and discuss factors that can impact the perception of fairness in the contest between humans and machines

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Rodrigo Canaan (15 papers)
  2. Christoph Salge (33 papers)
  3. Julian Togelius (154 papers)
  4. Andy Nealen (13 papers)
Citations (19)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.