Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 87 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 102 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 166 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 436 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

p-adic Tate conjectures and abeloid varieties (1903.05630v2)

Published 13 Mar 2019 in math.AG and math.NT

Abstract: We explore Tate-type conjectures over $p$-adic fields. We study a conjecture of Raskind that predicts the surjectivity of $$ ({\rm NS}(X_{\bar{K}}) \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}}\mathbb{Q}p){G_K} \longrightarrow H2{\rm et}(X_{\bar{K}},\mathbb{Q}p(1)){G_K} $$ if $X$ is smooth and projective over a $p$-adic field $K$ and has totally degenerate reduction. Sometimes, this is related to $p$-adic uniformisation. For abelian varieties, Raskind's conjecture is equivalent to the question whether $$ {\rm Hom}(A,B)\otimes{\mathbb{Q}}_p \,\to\, {\rm Hom}{G_K}(V_p(A),V_p(B)) $$ is surjective if $A$ and $B$ are abeloid varieties over $K$. Using $p$-adic Hodge theory and Fontaine's functors, we reformulate both problems into questions about the interplay of $\mathbb{Q}$- versus $\mathbb{Q}_p$-structures inside filtered $(\varphi,N)$-modules. Finally, we disprove all of these conjectures and questions by showing that they can fail for algebraisable abeloid surfaces.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.