Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 83 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 34 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 130 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 207 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 460 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

More on the preservation of large cardinals under class forcing (1810.09195v4)

Published 22 Oct 2018 in math.LO

Abstract: We prove two general results about the preservation of extendible and $C{(n)}$-extendible cardinals under a wide class of forcing iterations (Theorems 5.4 and 7.5). As applications we give new proofs of the preservation of Vop\v{e}nka's Principle and $C{(n)}$-extendible cardinals under Jensen's iteration for forcing the GCH, previously obtained by Brooke-Taylor and Tsaprounis, res-pectively. We prove that $C{(n)}$-extendible cardinals are preserved by forcing with standard Easton-support iterations for any possible $\Delta_2$-definable behaviour of the power-set function on regular cardinals. We show that one can force proper class-many disagreements between the universe and HOD with respect to the calculation of successors of regular cardinals, while preserving $C{(n)}$-extendible cardinals. We also show, assuming the GCH, that the class forcing iteration of Cummings-Foreman-Magidor for forcing $\diamondsuit_{\kappa+}+$ at every $\kappa$ preserves $C{(n)}$-extendible cardinals. We give an optimal result on the consistency of weak square principles and $C{(n)}$-extendible cardinals. In the last section we prove another preservation result for $C{(n)}$-extendible cardinals under very general (not necessarily definable or weakly homogeneous) class forcing iterations. As applications we prove the consistency of $C{(n)}$-extendible cardinals with $\rm{V}=\rm{HOD}$, and also with $\mathrm{GA}$ (the Ground Axiom) plus $\mathrm{V}\neq \mathrm{HOD}$, the latter being a strengthening of a result by Hamkins, Reitz and Woodin.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.