Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 62 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 93 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 213 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 458 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Non-local interactions in the $(d,p)$ surrogate method for $(n,γ)$ reactions (1810.04751v2)

Published 10 Oct 2018 in nucl-th

Abstract: Single-neutron transfer reactions populating states in the continuum are interesting both for structure and astrophysics. In their description often global optical potentials are used for the nucleon-target interactions, and these interactions are typically local. In our work, we study the effects of nonlocality in $(d,p)$ reactions populating continuum states. This work is similar to that of [1] but now for transfer to the continuum. A theory for computing cross sections for inclusive processes $A (d,p) X$ was explored in [2]. Therein, local optical potentials were used to describe the nucleon-target effective interaction. The goal of the present work is to extend the theory developed in [2] to investigate the effects of including nonlocality in the effective interaction on the relevant reaction observables. We implement the R--matrix method to solve the non--local equations both for the nucleon wavefunctions and the propagator. We then apply the method to systematically study the inclusive process of $(d,p)$ on ${16}$O, ${40}$Ca, ${48}$Ca and ${208}$Pb at 10, 20 and 50 MeV. We compare the results obtained when non--local interactions are used with those obtained when local equivalent interactions are included. We find that nonlocality affects different pieces of the model in complex ways. Depending on the beam energy and the target, the non-elastic breakup can either increase or decrease. While the non-elastic transfer cross section for each final spin state can change considerably, the main prediction of the model [2], namely the shape of the spin distributions, remains largely unaltered by nonlocality. [1] L. J. Titus and F. M. Nunes. Testing the Perey effect. Phys. Rev. C, 89:034609, Mar 2014. [2] G. Potel, F. M. Nunes, and I. J. Thompson. Establishing a theory for deuteron-induced surrogate reactions. Phys. Rev. C, 92:034611, Sep 2015.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.