Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 52 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 55 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 216 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 468 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

CODEV: Automated Model Predictive Control Design and Formal Verification (Tool Paper) (1804.02568v1)

Published 7 Apr 2018 in cs.SY

Abstract: We present CODEV, a Matlab-based tool for verifying systems employing Model Predictive Control (MPC). The MPC solution is computed offline and modeled together with the physical system as a hybrid automaton, whose continuous dynamics may be nonlinear with a control solution that remains affine. While MPC is a widely used synthesis technique for constrained and optimal control in industry, our tool provides the first automated approach of analyzing these systems for rigorous guarantees of safety. This is achieved by implementing a simulation-based verification algorithm for nonlinear hybrid models, with extensions tailored to the structure of the MPC solution. Given a physical model and parameters for desired system behavior (i.e. performance and constraints), CODEV generates a control law and verifies the resulting system will robustly maintain constraints. We have applied CODEV successfully to a set of benchmark examples, which illuminates its potential to tackle more complex problems for which MPC is used.

Citations (2)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)