Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 73 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 75 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 184 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 466 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Dark matter halos and the M-σrelation for supermassive black holes (1607.05478v1)

Published 19 Jul 2016 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: We develop models of two-component spherical galaxies to establish scaling relations linking the properties of spheroids at $z=0$ (total stellar masses, effective radii $R_e$ and velocity dispersions within $R_e$) to the properties of their dark-matter halos at both $z=0$ and higher redshifts. . Our main motivation is the widely accepted idea that the accretion-driven growth of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) in protogalaxies is limited by quasar-mode feedback and gas blow-out. The SMBH masses, $M_{\rm{BH}}$, should then be connected to the dark-matter potential wells at the redshift $z_{\rm{qso}}$ of the blow-out. We specifically consider the example of a power-law dependence on the maximum circular speed in a protogalactic dark-matter halo: $M_{\rm{BH}}\propto V4_{\rm{d,pk}}$, as could be expected if quasar-mode feedback were momentum-driven. For halos with a given $V_{\rm{d,pk}}$ at a given $z_{\rm{qso}}\ge 0$, our model scaling relations give a typical stellar velocity dispersion $\sigma_{\rm{ap}}(R_e)$ at $z=0$. Thus, they transform a theoretical $M_{\rm{BH}}$-$V_{\rm{d,pk}}$ relation into a prediction for an observable $M_{\rm{BH}}$-$\sigma_{\rm{ap}}(R_e)$ relation. We find the latter to be distinctly non-linear in log-log space. Its shape depends on the generic redshift-evolution of halos in a {$\Lambda$}CDM cosmology and the systematic variation of stellar-to-dark matter mass fraction at $z=0$, in addition to any assumptions about the physics underlying the $M_{\rm{BH}}$-$V_{\rm{d,pk}}$ relation. Despite some clear limitations of the form we use for $M_{\rm{BH}}$ versus $V_{\rm{d,pk}}$, and even though we do not include any SMBH growth through dry mergers at low redshift, our results for $M_{\rm{BH}}$-$\sigma_{\rm{ap}}(R_e)$ compare well to data for local early types if we take $z_{\rm{qso}} \sim$ 2-4.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube