Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 70 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 75 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 175 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro
2000 character limit reached

Arrangements of ideal type (1606.00617v4)

Published 2 Jun 2016 in math.CO and math.GR

Abstract: In 2006 Sommers and Tymoczko defined so called arrangements of ideal type A_I stemming from ideals I in the set of positive roots of a reduced root system. They showed in a case by case argument that A_I is free if the root system is of classical type or G_2 and conjectured that this is also the case for all types. This was established only recently in a uniform manner by Abe, Barakat, Cuntz, Hoge and Terao. The set of non-zero exponents of the free arrangement A_I is given by the dual of the height partition of the roots in the complement of I in the set of positive roots, generalizing the Shapiro-Steinberg-Kostant theorem. Our first aim in this paper is to investigate a stronger freeness property of the A_I. We show that all A_I are inductively free, with the possible exception of some cases in type E_8. In the same paper, Sommers and Tymoczko define a Poincar\'e polynomial I(t) associated with each ideal I which generalizes the Poincar\'e polynomial W(t) for the underlying Weyl group W. Solomon showed that W(t) satisfies a product decomposition depending on the exponents of W for any Coxeter group W. Sommers and Tymoczko showed in a case by case analysis in type A, B and C, and some small rank exceptional types that a similar factorization property holds for the Poincar\'e polynomials I(t) generalizing the formula of Solomon for W(t). They conjectured that their multiplicative formula for I(t) holds in all types. Here we show that this conjecture holds inductively in almost all instances.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.