Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 63 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 86 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 194 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 445 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Ultramassive dense early-type galaxies: velocity dispersions and number density evolution since z=1.6 (1605.03014v1)

Published 10 May 2016 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: In this paper we investigate the mass assembly history of ultramassive (Mstar > 1011Msun) dense (Sigma = Mstar/(2*pi*Re2) > 2500 Msun/pc2) early-type galaxies (ETGs) over the last 9 Gyr. We have traced the evolution of the number density rho of ultramassive dense ETGs and have compared their structural (effective radius Re and stellar mass Mstar) and dynamical (velocity dispersion sigma_e) parameters over the redshift range 0 < z < 1.6. We have derived the number density at 1.6 < z < 1 from the MUNICS and GOODS-South surveys, while we have used the COSMOS and SDSS spectroscopic surveys to probe the intermediate and local redshift range. For the comparison of the dynamical and structural parameters, we have collected the ultramassive dense ETGs at 1.2 < z < 1.6 for which velocity dispersion measurements are available (11 ETGs). For 4 of them we present unpublished estimates of sigma_e. We probe the intermediate redshift range, and the local universe using the samples of ETGs by Saglia et al. (2010), Zahid et al. (2015), and by Thomas et al. (2010). We find that the number density of ultramassive dense ETGs evolves as rho(z) = K*(1 + z)0.3\m0.8) implying a decrease of ~ 25% of the population since z = 1.6. By comparing the values of Re, Mstar, and sigma_e of ultramassive dense ETGs over the range 0 < z < 1.6 we find that all the high-z ETGs have a counterpart in the local universe. This implies either that the majority (~70%) of ultramassive dense ETGs has already completed its assembly and its shaping at <z> = 1.4, or that, if a significant fraction of them evolves in size, new ultramassive dense ETGs must form at z < 1.5 to maintain their number density almost constant. The difficulty into identify good progenitors for these new dense ETGs at z < 1.5, and the stellar populations properties of local ultramassive dense ETGs point toward the first hypothesis.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.