Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 164 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 46 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 72 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 204 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 450 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 34 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The Efficiency of Magnetic Field Amplification at Shocks by Turbulence (1603.08518v2)

Published 28 Mar 2016 in astro-ph.HE and astro-ph.CO

Abstract: Turbulent dynamo field amplification has often been invoked to explain the strong field strengths in thin rims in supernova shocks ($\sim 100 \, \mu$G) and in radio relics in galaxy clusters ($\sim \mu$G). We present high resolution MHD simulations of the interaction between pre-shock turbulence, clumping and shocks, to quantify the conditions under which turbulent dynamo amplification can be significant. We demonstrate numerically converged field amplification which scales with Alfv\'en Mach number, $B/B_0 \propto {\mathcal M}{\rm A}$, up to ${\mathcal M}{\rm A} \sim 150$. This implies that the post-shock field strength is relatively independent of the seed field. Amplification is dominated by compression at low ${\mathcal M}{\rm A}$, and stretching (turbulent amplification) at high ${\mathcal M}{\rm A}$. For high $\mathcal{M}{\rm A}$, the $B$-field grows exponentially and saturates at equipartition with turbulence, while the vorticity jumps sharply at the shock and subsequently decays; the resulting field is orientated predominately along the shock normal (an effect only apparent in 3D and not 2D). This agrees with the radial field bias seen in supernova remnants. By contrast, for low $\mathcal{M}{\rm A}$, field amplification is mostly compressional, relatively modest, and results in a predominantly perpendicular field. The latter is consistent with the polarization seen in radio relics. Our results are relatively robust to the assumed level of gas clumping. Our results imply that the turbulent dynamo may be important for supernovae, but is only consistent with the field strength, and not geometry, for cluster radio relics. For the latter, this implies strong pre-existing $B$-fields in the ambient cluster outskirts.

Citations (32)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com