Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Scalar-multi-tensorial equivalence for higher order $f\left( R,\nabla_μ R,\nabla_{μ_{1}}\nabla_{μ_{2}}R,...,\nabla_{μ_{1}}...\nabla_{μ_{n} }R\right)$ theories of gravity (1603.01563v3)

Published 4 Mar 2016 in gr-qc, astro-ph.CO, hep-th, math-ph, and math.MP

Abstract: The equivalence between theories depending on the derivatives of $R$, i.e. $f\left( R,\nabla R,...,\nabla{n}R\right) $, and scalar-multi-tensorial theories is verified. The analysis is done in both metric and Palatini formalisms. It is shown that $f\left( R,\nabla R,...,\nabla{n}R\right) $ theories are equivalent to scalar-multi-tensorial ones resembling Brans-Dicke theories with kinetic terms $\omega_{0}=0$ and $\omega_{0}= - \frac{3}{2}$ for metric and Palatini formalisms respectively. This result is analogous to what happens for $f(R)$ theories. It is worthy emphasizing that the scalar-multi-tensorial theories obtained here differ from Brans-Dicke ones due to the presence of multiple tensorial fields absent in the last. Furthermore, sufficient conditions are established for $f\left( R,\nabla R,...,\nabla{n}R\right) $ theories to be written as scalar-multi-tensorial theories. Finally, some examples are studied and the comparison of $f\left( R,\nabla R,...,\nabla{n}R\right) $ theories to $f\left( R,\Box R,...\Box{n}R\right) $ theories is performed.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Slide Deck Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Whiteboard

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.