Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 85 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 37 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 201 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 455 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 33 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Discovery of a periodical apoastron GeV peak in LS I +61°303 (1412.2028v1)

Published 5 Dec 2014 in astro-ph.HE

Abstract: Aims. The aim of this paper is to analyse the previously discovered discontinuity of the periodicity of the GeV $\gamma$-ray emission of the radio-loud X-ray binary LS I +61{\deg}303 and to determine its physical origin. Methods. We used wavelet analysis to explore the temporal development of periodic signals. The wavelet analysis was first applied to the whole data set of available Fermi-LAT data and then to the two subsets of orbital phase intervals $\Phi = 0.0 - 0.5$ and $\Phi = 0.5 - 1.0$. We also performed a Lomb-Scargle timing Analysis. We investigated the similarities between GeV $\gamma$-ray emission and radio emission by comparing the folded curves of the Fermi-LAT data and the Green Bank Interferometer radio data. Results. During the epochs when the timing analysis fails to determine the orbital periodicity, the periodicity is present in the two orbital phase intervals $\Phi = 0.0 - 0.5$ and $\Phi = 0.5 - 1.0$. That is, there are two periodical signals, one towards periastron (i.e., $\Phi = 0.0 - 0.5$) and another one towards apoastron ($\Phi = 0.5 - 1.0$). The apoastron peak seems to be affected by the same orbital shift as the radio outbursts and, in addition, reveals the same two periods $P_1$ and $P_2$ that are present in the radio data. Conclusions. The $\gamma$-ray emission of the apoastron peak normally just broadens the emission of the peak around periastron. Only when it appears at $\Phi \approx 0.8 - 1.0$, because of the orbital shift, it is enough detached from the first peak to become recognisable as a second orbital peak, which is the reason why the timing analysis fails. Two $\gamma$-ray peaks along the orbit are predicted by the two-peak accretion model for an eccentric orbit, that was proposed by several authors for LS I +61{\deg}303.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.